Literature DB >> 26104275

Adult feeding moths (Sphingidae) differ from non-adult feeding ones (Saturniidae) in activity-timing overlap and temporal niche width.

Nícholas F de Camargo1,2, Willian R F de Camargo3, Danilo do C V Corrêa4, Amabílio J A de Camargo3, Emerson M Vieira5.   

Abstract

According to classic ecology, resource partitioning by segregation along at least one of the three main niche axes (time, food, and space) must take place for the coexistence of species with similar ecological requirements. We used nocturnal light traps to investigate the assemblage structuration of two moth families: Sphingidae (23 species) and Saturniidae (13 species). Because competition for food among adults potentially occurs only among sphingids, only for this family did we expect less overlap of diel activity patterns than expected by chance and also a greater temporal niche width compared to saturniids. Moreover, we expected a greater number of sphingid species pairs to differ in activity timing compared to saturniid pairs. We also hypothesized that in the case of a lack of temporal structuration, sphingids would be morphologically structured in relation to proboscis length. Contrary to what we expected, both families overlapped their activity patterns more than expected by chance alone and sphingid moths were not morphologically structured. Nevertheless, there were 173 significant pairwise differences in temporal activity between sphingids, contrasting with no interspecific differences between saturniids. Sphingid species also showed a wider temporal niche width than saturniids, as expected. Predation risk and abiotic factors may have caused the overall similarities in activity patterns for both families. The temporal niche seemed not to be determinant for the assemblage structuration of moths as a whole for either of the studied families, but segregation along the temporal niche axis of some potentially competing species pairs can be a relevant factor for the coexistence of nectar-feeding species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assemblage structure; Chronoecology; Competition; Predation; Resource partitioning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26104275     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3363-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  17 in total

1.  Intraspecific competition favours niche width expansion in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D I Bolnick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The compression hypothesis and temporal resource partitioning.

Authors:  T W Schoener
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species.

Authors:  Marten Scheffer; Egbert H van Nes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Resource competition, character displacement, and the evolution of deep corolla tubes.

Authors:  Miguel A Rodríguez-Gironés; Luis Santamaría
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Size-specific interaction patterns and size matching in a plant-pollinator interaction web.

Authors:  Martina Stang; Peter G L Klinkhamer; Nickolas M Waser; Ingo Stang; Eddy van der Meijden
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  What is resource partitioning?

Authors:  G H Walter
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1991-05-21       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Spatial and temporal niche partitioning in grassland ants.

Authors:  M Albrecht; N J Gotelli
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  THE NATURE OF NICHE EXPANSION IN WEST INDIAN ANOLIS LIZARDS I: ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF REDUCED COMPETITION.

Authors:  Bradford C Lister
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Armament imbalances: match and mismatch in plant-pollinator traits of highly specialized long-spurred orchids.

Authors:  Marcela Moré; Felipe W Amorim; Santiago Benitez-Vieyra; A Martin Medina; Marlies Sazima; Andrea A Cocucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Is Nocturnal Foraging in a Tropical Bee an Escape From Interference Competition?

Authors:  Adam R Smith; Shannon M Kitchen; Ryan M Toney; Christian Ziegler
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.857

2.  Temporal Segregation between Dung-Inhabiting Beetle and Fly Species.

Authors:  Frantisek Xaver Jiri Sladecek; Simon Tristram Segar; Colin Lee; Richard Wall; Martin Konvicka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.