Literature DB >> 26104220

Development of a support tool for the clinical diagnosis of symptomatic lumbar intra- and/or extra-foraminal stenosis.

Hiroshi Yamada1, Hiroyuki Oka2, Hiroshi Iwasaki3, Toru Endo3, Masahiko Kioka3, Yuyu Ishimoto3, Keiji Nagata3, Noboru Takiguchi3, Hiroshi Hashizume3, Akihito Minamide3, Yukihiro Nakagawa3, Masaki Kawai3, Shunji Tsutsui3, Munehito Yoshida3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Not all lumbar intra- and/or extra-foraminal stenosis (LIEFS) on MRI is symptomatic. Therefore, the establishment of clinical diagnostic tools that can identify patients with symptomatic LIEFS is crucial in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to develop a support tool for clinical diagnosis of LIEFS.
METHODS: Patients with L5 radiculopathy alone were prospectively enrolled. Fifty-one patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis only at the L4-5 level and 49 patients with LIEFS only at the L5-S1 level were extracted from this cohort. We compared the two groups with regard to 12 variables--three subjective and three objective items from the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score; Kemp's sign; results of the lumbar flexion test, Bonnet test, and Freiberg test; pain on sitting; and pain when recumbent--to determine which factors were associated with a high index of clinical suspicion of LIEFS.
RESULTS: The significant predictors of a final diagnosis of LIEFS were identified as follows: pain when recumbent, Freiberg and Bonnet test results, and pain on sitting. To develop a diagnostic tool, a scoring system (0-20 points) was formulated on the basis of the contribution ratios of these risk factors. To determine the contribution ratio, an integer score was assigned to the identified risk factors as follows: pain when recumbent = 9 points, Freiberg = 5 points, Bonnet = 3 points, and pain on sitting = 3 points. The Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic for this scoring system was p = 0.063, and confirmed that it was a good model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated a cut-off value of 5 points, an area under the ROC curve of 0.87435, sensitivity of 75.5 %, and specificity of 82.3 %.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the use of this tool in the clinical setting will improve the accuracy of diagnosing symptomatic LIEFS, which will lead to improved quality of patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26104220     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-015-0743-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  3 in total

1.  Assessment of Clinical Symptoms in Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.

Authors:  Yawara Eguchi; Munetaka Suzuki; Hajime Yamanaka; Hiroshi Tamai; Tatsuya Kobayashi; Sumihisa Orita; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Miyako Suzuki; Kazuhide Inage; Hirohito Kanamoto; Koki Abe; Yasuchika Aoki; Masao Koda; Takeo Furuya; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2017-03-31

2.  Spinal Endoscopy for Delayed-Onset Lumbar Radiculopathy Resulting from Foraminal Stenosis after Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: A Case Report of a New Surgical Strategy.

Authors:  Yuyu Ishimoto; Hiroshi Yamada; Elizabeth Curtis; Cyrus Cooper; Hiroshi Hashizume; Akihito Minamide; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2018-10-25

3.  Comparison of Outcomes of Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Full-endoscopic Laminectomy for L5 Radiculopathy Caused by Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis.

Authors:  Muneyoshi Fujita; Takahiro Inui; Yasushi Oshima; Hiroki Iwai; Hirohiko Inanami; Hisashi Koga
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.036

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.