Literature DB >> 26102429

Psychological predictors of opportunistic snacking in the absence of hunger.

Stephanie H Fay1, Melanie J White2, Graham Finlayson3, Neil A King2.   

Abstract

Increased frequency of eating in the absence of homeostatic need, notably through snacking, is an important contributor to overconsumption and may be facilitated by increased availability of palatable food in the obesogenic environment. Opportunistic initiation of snacking is likely to be subject to individual differences, although these are infrequently studied in laboratory-based research paradigms. This study examined psychological factors associated with opportunistic initiation of snacking, and predictors of intake in the absence of homeostatic need. Fifty adults (mean age 34.5years, mean BMI 23.9kg/m(2), 56% female) participated in a snack taste test in which they ate a chocolate snack to satiation, after which they were offered an unanticipated opportunity to initiate a second eating episode. Trait and behavioural measures of self control, sensitivity to reward, dietary restraint and disinhibited eating were taken. Results showed that, contrary to expectations, those who initiated snacking were better at inhibitory control compared with those who did not initiate. However, amongst participants who initiated snacking, intake (kcal) was predicted by higher food reward sensitivity, impulsivity and BMI. These findings suggest that snacking initiation in the absence of hunger is an important contributor to overconsumption. Consideration of the individual differences promoting initiation of eating may aid in reducing elevated eating frequency in at-risk individuals.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eating frequency; Eating initiation; Inhibitory control; Overconsumption; Reward

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26102429     DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Behav        ISSN: 1471-0153


  9 in total

1.  Using pre-prandial blood glucose to assess eating in the absence of hunger in free-living individuals.

Authors:  Susan M Schembre; Yue Liao; Jimi Huh; Stefan Keller
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2020-07-09

Review 2.  What Is a Snack, Why Do We Snack, and How Can We Choose Better Snacks? A Review of the Definitions of Snacking, Motivations to Snack, Contributions to Dietary Intake, and Recommendations for Improvement.

Authors:  Julie M Hess; Satya S Jonnalagadda; Joanne L Slavin
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 3.  Obesity and Eating Disturbance: the Role of TFEQ Restraint and Disinhibition.

Authors:  Eleanor J Bryant; Javairia Rehman; Lisa B Pepper; Elizabeth R Walters
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2019-12

4.  Contextual factors associated with eating in the absence of hunger among adults with obesity.

Authors:  Andrea B Goldschmidt; Ross D Crosby; Li Cao; Carolyn M Pearson; Linsey M Utzinger; Carly R Pacanowski; Tyler B Mason; Laura A Berner; Scott G Engel; Stephen A Wonderlich; Carol B Peterson
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2017-01-17

Review 5.  Psychosociocultural Contributors to Maladaptive Eating Behaviors in African American Youth: Recommendations and Future Directions.

Authors:  Joya N Hampton-Anderson; Linda W Craighead
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2020-06-29

6.  Objective quantification of the food proximity effect on grapes, chocolate and cracker consumption in a Swedish high school. A temporal analysis.

Authors:  Billy Langlet; Petter Fagerberg; Andrew Glossner; Ioannis Ioakimidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Factors behind healthy snack consumption at school among high-school students: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Bastami; Fereshteh Zamani-Alavijeh; Firoozeh Mostafavi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  ERP and oscillatory differences in overweight/obese and normal-weight adolescents in response to food stimuli.

Authors:  Stefanie C Biehl; Julian Keil; Eva Naumann; Jennifer Svaldi
Journal:  J Eat Disord       Date:  2020-04-07

9.  Pregnant Women Consume a Similar Proportion of Highly vs Minimally Processed Foods in the Absence of Hunger, Leading to Large Differences in Energy Intake.

Authors:  Leah M Lipsky; Kyle S Burger; Myles S Faith; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Aiyi Liu; Grace E Shearrer; Tonja R Nansel
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.910

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.