Literature DB >> 26102421

Diagnosis of Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer on Prostate MRI: Impact of Second-Opinion Readings by Subspecialized Genitourinary Oncologic Radiologists.

Andreas Wibmer1, Hebert Alberto Vargas1, Timothy F Donahue2, Junting Zheng3, Chaya Moskowitz3, James Eastham2, Evis Sala1, Hedvig Hricak1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to investigate the added value of second-opinion evaluation of prostate MRI by subspecialized genitourinary oncologic radiologists for the assessment of extracapsular extension (ECE) of prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of initial and second-opinion radiology reports of 76 patients who underwent MRI of the prostate before prostatectomy for histologically proven prostate cancer. Initial outside reports and second-opinion reports were unpaired and reviewed in random order by a urologist who was blinded to patients' clinical details and histopathologic data. Histopathologic analysis of the prostatectomy specimen served as the reference standard.
RESULTS: Among cases with diagnostic-quality images available (71/76; 93%), disagreement between the initial report and the second-opinion report was observed in 30% of cases (21/71; κ = 0.35); in 18 of these 21 cases (86%), histopathologic analysis proved that the second-opinion report was correct. The second-opinion interpretations had statistically significantly higher sensitivity (66% vs 24%; p < 0.0001) than did the initial reports, whereas there was no statistically significant difference in specificity (87% vs 93%; p = 0.317). On ROC curve analysis, the second-opinion reports yielded a statistically significantly higher AUC for the detection of ECE (0.80 vs 0.65; p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: The reinterpretation of prostate MRI examinations by subspecialized genitourinary oncologic radiologists improved the detection of ECE of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; extracapsular tumor extension of prostate cancer; second-opinion readings; second-opinion reinterpretation; subspecialization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26102421     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  26 in total

1.  Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging Expertise.

Authors:  Sharyl J Nass; Christopher R Cogle; James A Brink; Curtis P Langlotz; Erin P Balogh; Ada Muellner; Dana Siegal; Richard L Schilsky; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Temporal changes in MRI appearance of the prostate after focal ablation.

Authors:  Andreas M Hötker; Andreas Meier; Yousef Mazaheri; Junting Zheng; Marinela Capanu; Joshua Chaim; Ramon Sosa; Jonathan Coleman; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-01

3.  Assessment of deep myometrial invasion of endometrial cancer on MRI: added value of second-opinion interpretations by radiologists subspecialized in gynaecologic oncology.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Sang Youn Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Seung Hyup Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  National Trends in Oncologic Diagnostic Imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Laura Chaves Cerdas; Danny R Hughes; Michael P Recht; Sharyl J Nass; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Second-Opinion Review of Breast Imaging at a Cancer Center: Is It Worthwhile?

Authors:  Kristen Coffey; Donna D'Alessio; Delia M Keating; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Does Second Reader Opinion Affect Patient Management in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Giuseppe Corrias; Sandra Huicochea Castellanos; Ryan Merkow; Russel Langan; Vinod Balachandran; Monica Ragucci; Gabriella Carollo; Marcello Mancini; Luca Saba; Lorenzo Mannelli
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Second opinions in orthopedic oncology imaging: can fellowship training reduce clinically significant discrepancies?

Authors:  Aleksandr Rozenberg; Barry E Kenneally; John A Abraham; Kristin Strogus; Johannes B Roedl; William B Morrison; Adam C Zoga
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: value of second-opinion interpretations of cross-sectional images by subspecialized radiologists.

Authors:  Sandra Huicochea Castellanos; Giuseppe Corrias; Gary A Ulaner; Mark Dunphy; Zheng Junting; Marinela Capanu; Vinod Balachandran; Romina Grazia Giancipoli; Serena Monti; Lorenzo Mannelli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-02

9.  Second-opinion interpretations of neuroimaging studies by oncologic neuroradiologists can help reduce errors in cancer care.

Authors:  Vaios Hatzoglou; Antonio M Omuro; Sofia Haque; Yasmin Khakoo; Ian Ganly; Jung Hun Oh; Amita Shukla-Dave; Robin Fatovic; Joshua Gaal; Andrei I Holodny
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Combining Drive Time and Urologist Density to Understand Access to Urologic Care.

Authors:  Claire L Leiser; Ross E Anderson; Christopher Martin; Heidi A Hanson; Brock O'Neil
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.