Literature DB >> 26102345

Understanding the effect of touchdown distance and ankle joint kinematics on sprint acceleration performance through computer simulation.

Neil Edward Bezodis1, Grant Trewartha, Aki Ilkka Tapio Salo.   

Abstract

This study determined the effects of simulated technique manipulations on early acceleration performance. A planar seven-segment angle-driven model was developed and quantitatively evaluated based on the agreement of its output to empirical data from an international-level male sprinter (100 m personal best = 10.28 s). The model was then applied to independently assess the effects of manipulating touchdown distance (horizontal distance between the foot and centre of mass) and range of ankle joint dorsiflexion during early stance on horizontal external power production during stance. The model matched the empirical data with a mean difference of 5.2%. When the foot was placed progressively further forward at touchdown, horizontal power production continually reduced. When the foot was placed further back, power production initially increased (a peak increase of 0.7% occurred at 0.02 m further back) but decreased as the foot continued to touchdown further back. When the range of dorsiflexion during early stance was reduced, exponential increases in performance were observed. Increasing negative touchdown distance directs the ground reaction force more horizontally; however, a limit to the associated performance benefit exists. Reducing dorsiflexion, which required achievable increases in the peak ankle plantar flexor moment, appears potentially beneficial for improving early acceleration performance.

Keywords:  Kinematics; kinetics; modelling; sprinting; technique

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26102345     DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2015.1052748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Biomech        ISSN: 1476-3141            Impact factor:   2.832


  7 in total

Review 1.  A New Direction to Athletic Performance: Understanding the Acute and Longitudinal Responses to Backward Running.

Authors:  Aaron Uthoff; Jon Oliver; John Cronin; Craig Harrison; Paul Winwood
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Biomechanical Performance Factors in the Track and Field Sprint Start: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maria João Valamatos; João M Abrantes; Filomena Carnide; Maria-José Valamatos; Cristina P Monteiro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Relationship between Step-by-Step Foot Kinematics and Sprint Performance.

Authors:  Isabel Martín-Fuentes; Roland van den Tillaar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Muscle-tendon unit length changes differ between young and adult sprinters in the first stance phase of sprint running.

Authors:  Jeroen Aeles; Ilse Jonkers; Sofie Debaere; Christophe Delecluse; Benedicte Vanwanseele
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Stride and Step Length Obtained with Inertial Measurement Units during Maximal Sprint Acceleration.

Authors:  Cornelis J de Ruiter; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-31

Review 6.  The Biomechanics of the Track and Field Sprint Start: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Neil Edward Bezodis; Steffen Willwacher; Aki Ilkka Tapio Salo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Modifications to the net knee moments lead to the greatest improvements in accelerative sprinting performance: a predictive simulation study.

Authors:  Nicos Haralabidis; Steffi L Colyer; Gil Serrancolí; Aki I T Salo; Dario Cazzola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.996

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.