Catherine S Hwang1, Lydia W Turner, Stefan P Kruszewski, Andrew Kolodny, G Caleb Alexander. 1. *Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness Departments of †Epidemiology ‡Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health **Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD §Stefan P. Kruszewski, MD & Associates, Harrisburg, PA ∥Phoenix House Foundation #Global Institute for Public Health, New York University, New York, NY ¶Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Physicians are a key stakeholder in the epidemic of prescription opioid abuse. Therefore, we assessed their knowledge of opioid abuse and diversion, as well as their support for clinical and regulatory interventions to reduce opioid-related morbidity and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a nationally representative postal mail survey of 1000 practicing internists, family physicians, and general practitioners in the United States between February and May 2014. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 58%, and all physicians (100%) believed that prescription drug abuse was a problem in their communities. However, only two-thirds (66%) correctly reported that the most common route of abuse was swallowing pills whole, and nearly one-half (46%) erroneously reported that abuse-deterrent formulations were less addictive than their counterparts. In addition, a notable minority of physicians (25%) reported being "not at all" or "only slightly concerned" about the potential for opioid diversion from the licit to the illicit market when this practice is common at all levels of the pharmaceutical supply chain. Most physicians supported clinical and regulatory interventions to reduce prescription opioid abuse, including the use of patient contracts (98%), urine drug testing (90%), requiring prescribers to check a centralized database before prescribing opioids (88%), and instituting greater restrictions on the marketing and promotion of opioids (77% to 82%). Despite this, only one-third of physicians (33%) believed that interventions to reduce prescription opioid abuse had a moderate or large effect on preventing patients' clinically appropriate access to pain treatment. DISCUSSION: Although physicians are unaware of some facets of prescription opioid-related morbidity, most support a variety of clinical and regulatory interventions to improve the risk-benefit balance of these therapies.
OBJECTIVES: Physicians are a key stakeholder in the epidemic of prescription opioid abuse. Therefore, we assessed their knowledge of opioid abuse and diversion, as well as their support for clinical and regulatory interventions to reduce opioid-related morbidity and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a nationally representative postal mail survey of 1000 practicing internists, family physicians, and general practitioners in the United States between February and May 2014. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 58%, and all physicians (100%) believed that prescription drug abuse was a problem in their communities. However, only two-thirds (66%) correctly reported that the most common route of abuse was swallowing pills whole, and nearly one-half (46%) erroneously reported that abuse-deterrent formulations were less addictive than their counterparts. In addition, a notable minority of physicians (25%) reported being "not at all" or "only slightly concerned" about the potential for opioid diversion from the licit to the illicit market when this practice is common at all levels of the pharmaceutical supply chain. Most physicians supported clinical and regulatory interventions to reduce prescription opioid abuse, including the use of patient contracts (98%), urine drug testing (90%), requiring prescribers to check a centralized database before prescribing opioids (88%), and instituting greater restrictions on the marketing and promotion of opioids (77% to 82%). Despite this, only one-third of physicians (33%) believed that interventions to reduce prescription opioid abuse had a moderate or large effect on preventing patients' clinically appropriate access to pain treatment. DISCUSSION: Although physicians are unaware of some facets of prescription opioid-related morbidity, most support a variety of clinical and regulatory interventions to improve the risk-benefit balance of these therapies.
Authors: Li-Tzy Wu; Jennifer McNeely; Geetha A Subramaniam; Kathleen T Brady; Gaurav Sharma; Paul VanVeldhuisen; He Zhu; Robert P Schwartz Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Sebastian T Tong; Kathryn M Polak; Michael F Weaver; Gabriela C Villalobos; Wally R Smith; Dace S Svikis Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2019 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Nicholas E Hagemeier; Fred Tudiver; Scott Brewster; Elizabeth J Hagy; Brittany Ratliff; Angela Hagaman; Robert P Pack Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Joseph W Frank; Cari Levy; Daniel D Matlock; Susan L Calcaterra; Shane R Mueller; Stephen Koester; Ingrid A Binswanger Journal: Pain Med Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Susan H Busch; Emma E McGinty; Marcus A Bachhuber; Jeff Niederdeppe; Sarah E Gollust; Daniel W Webster; David A Fiellin; Colleen L Barry Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-05-21 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Nicholas E Hagemeier; Fred Tudiver; Scott Brewster; Elizabeth J Hagy; Angela Hagaman; Robert P Pack Journal: Res Social Adm Pharm Date: 2015-12-29
Authors: W Michael Hooten; Jodie Dvorkin; Nafisseh S Warner; Amy Cs Pearson; M Hassan Murad; David O Warner Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 3.133