Literature DB >> 26102269

Evaluating Parameters Affecting Fluoroscopy Time During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Focus on the Predictive Role of Guy's, S.T.O.N.E., and CROES Scoring Systems.

Stavros Sfoungaristos1, Ofer N Gofrit1, Vladimir Yutkin1, Ezekiel H Landau1, Dov Pode1, Mordechai Duvdevani1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify parameters predicting prolonged fluoroscopy time (FT) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and to evaluate the predictive ability of Guy's stone score, S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry, and CROES nomogram. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 153 consecutive patients who underwent a PCNL by a single experienced surgeon. Several preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters, including the three scoring systems, were assessed for their ability to predict FT.
RESULTS: FT was significantly associated with stone burden, stone location, number of stones, number of punctures, and number of tracts. It was also significantly associated with all scoring systems. Fluoroscopy use was significantly higher in patients who were effectively treated in these with longer hospitalization, probably reflecting case complexity. No association was found with postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: FT during PCNL can be affected by several parameters. Identifying the ones that can affect FT can lead to fluoroscopy and radiation exposure decrease. Guy's stone score, S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry, and CROES nomogram can all predict complexed cases and the need for increased FT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26102269     DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  4 in total

1.  Nephrolithometric Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Simone L Vernez; Zhamshid Okhunov; Piruz Motamedinia; Vincent Bird; Zeph Okeke; Arthur Smith
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

2.  Pulsed versus continuous mode fluoroscopy during PCNL: safety and effectiveness comparison in a case series study.

Authors:  Otas Durutovic; Zoran Dzamic; Bogomir Milojevic; Predrag Nikic; Ana Mimic; Uros Bumbasirevic; Aleksandar Vuksanovic; Dragica Milenkovic Petronic; Athanasios Papatsoris; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  What is the quickest scoring system to predict percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes? A comparative study among S.T.O.N.E score, guy's stone score and croes nomogram.

Authors:  Fabio C Vicentini; Felipe R Serzedello; Kay Thomas; Giovanni S Marchini; Fabio C M Torricelli; Miguel Srougi; Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  Increasing stone complexity does not affect fluoroscopy time in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Annah Vollstedt; Johann Ingimarsson; Lawrence Dagrosa; Vernon Pais
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-04-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.