Literature DB >> 26101979

Autologous Fat Grafting After Breast Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Patients: Complications, Biopsy Rates, and Locoregional Cancer Recurrence Rates.

Christodoulos Kaoutzanis1, Minqiang Xin, Tiffany N S Ballard, Kathleen B Welch, Adeyiza O Momoh, Jeffrey H Kozlow, David L Brown, Paul S Cederna, Edwin G Wilkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting is widely used for refinements in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. However, there are few studies evaluating outcomes in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes of autologous fat grafting after breast reconstruction in postmastectomy patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive postmastectomy patients who underwent autologous fat grafting after breast reconstruction at a university center over a 5-year period. Patients with at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, operative details, complications, incidence of palpable masses, and/or suspicious breast imaging findings requiring biopsy, and locoregional cancer recurrence. Descriptive statistics were generated.
RESULTS: Between January 2008 and July 2013, 108 women and a total of 167 breast reconstructions underwent autologous fat grafting for revision of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Their ages ranged from 22 to 71 years (mean, 48 years). Fat grafts were harvested, processed, and injected using the Coleman technique. The mean number of fat grafting procedures was 1.3 (range, 1-4) per breast. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 57 months (mean, 20.2 months). Fifty-three (31.7%) breasts underwent imaging after autologous fat grafting. Suspicious imaging findings requiring biopsy were discovered in 4 (2.4%) breasts, and clinically palpable lesions combined with suspicious imaging findings requiring biopsy were present in another 4 (2.4%) breasts. All 8 biopsies showed fat necrosis, scar, or oil cysts without evidence of malignancy. One (0.6%) local complication (a wound infection at the recipient site requiring oral antibiotics) after autologous fat grafting was reported. During the limited follow-up period, there were no locoregional cancer recurrences.
CONCLUSIONS: Autologous fat grafting in conjunction with breast reconstruction resulted in a biopsy rate of 4.8%, and no cases of locoregional cancer recurrence were observed. Based on these preliminary findings, autologous fat grafting appears to be a relatively safe procedure for refinement of the reconstructed breast in postmastectomy patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26101979     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  13 in total

Review 1.  Autologous fat grafting in breast reconstruction: implications for follow-up and surveillance.

Authors:  Summer E Hanson; Sahil K Kapur; Rosa F Hwang; Mark S Dryden
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

2.  A Preliminary Exploratory Study of Autologous Fat Transplantation in Breast Augmentation With Different Fat Transplantation Planes.

Authors:  Bin Li; Yuping Quan; Yufei He; Yunfan He; Feng Lu; Yunjun Liao; Junrong Cai
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 3.  Oncological Safety of Autologous Fat Grafting in Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis Based on Matched Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Ming Li; Yao Shi; Qiuyue Li; Xin Guo; Xuefeng Han; Facheng Li
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Association of Fat Grafting With Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Edwin G Wilkins; Babak J Mehrara; Jeffrey H Kozlow
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Meta-analysis of the oncological safety of autologous fat transfer after breast cancer.

Authors:  T K Krastev; S J Schop; J Hommes; A A Piatkowski; E M Heuts; R R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  The Crosstalk Between Adipose-Derived Stem or Stromal Cells (ASC) and Cancer Cells and ASC-Mediated Effects on Cancer Formation and Progression-ASCs: Safety Hazard or Harmless Source of Tropism?

Authors:  Vincent G J Guillaume; Tim Ruhl; Anja M Boos; Justus P Beier
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 7.655

7.  Autologous Fat Grafting Does Not Increase Risk of Oncologic Recurrence in the Reconstructed Breast.

Authors:  Krishna S Vyas; Ryan C DeCoster; Jack C Burns; Louis T Rodgers; Max A Shrout; James P Mercer; Cristin Coquillard; Adam J Dugan; Michael D Baratta; Brian D Rinker; Henry C Vasconez
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 8.  Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy.

Authors:  Daniel Schmauss; Hans-Günther Machens; Yves Harder
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-01-19

Review 9.  Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Novel Approaches to Breast Reconstruction: Their Suitability for Tissue Engineering and Oncological Safety.

Authors:  Niamh O'Halloran; Donald Courtney; Michael J Kerin; Aoife J Lowery
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2017-08-16

10.  Assessment of the clinical efficacy of cell-assisted lipotransfer and conventional fat graft: a meta-analysis based on case-control studies.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Yanfei Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.