OBJECTIVE: Previous research has investigated the physiological determinants of heavy load carriage while performing medium to long distance road marching, yet research examining the physiological underpinnings of high-intensity battlefield tasks is limited. This study sought to examine the role of strength and power during high-intensity combat tasks under heavy load carriage. METHODS:Eighteen recreationally trained men (mean±SD: age, 21±2 years; height, 172±6 cm; weight, 80±13 kg) participated in this study and performed an anaerobic combat course under 2 randomized experimental conditions; unloaded and loaded. Subjects performed 3 trials under each condition on separate days, with a 5-minute rest between each trial. In the unloaded trial, subjects wore a uniform with boots weighing approximately 3.2 kg. During the loaded trial, in addition to the uniform and boots, subjects wore Interceptor body armor (6.94 kg-9.10 kg) and a MOLLE rucksack weighing 30 kg. The course consisted of 3 consecutive tasks, which began from the prone position, led into a 30 m sprint, followed by a 27 m zigzag run, and ended with a 10 m casualty drag weighing approximately 79.4 kg. RESULTS: Pearson correlations showed significant (P≤.05) strong correlations between lower body strength (r=-0.63, -0.62), lower body power (r=-0.67, -0.67) and upper body strength (r=-0.60, -0.62) and overall performance times in the unloaded and loaded condition, respectively. CONCLUSION: Strength and power are strongly related to high-intensity military tasks with and without heavy load carriage.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Previous research has investigated the physiological determinants of heavy load carriage while performing medium to long distance road marching, yet research examining the physiological underpinnings of high-intensity battlefield tasks is limited. This study sought to examine the role of strength and power during high-intensity combat tasks under heavy load carriage. METHODS: Eighteen recreationally trained men (mean±SD: age, 21±2 years; height, 172±6 cm; weight, 80±13 kg) participated in this study and performed an anaerobic combat course under 2 randomized experimental conditions; unloaded and loaded. Subjects performed 3 trials under each condition on separate days, with a 5-minute rest between each trial. In the unloaded trial, subjects wore a uniform with boots weighing approximately 3.2 kg. During the loaded trial, in addition to the uniform and boots, subjects wore Interceptor body armor (6.94 kg-9.10 kg) and a MOLLE rucksack weighing 30 kg. The course consisted of 3 consecutive tasks, which began from the prone position, led into a 30 m sprint, followed by a 27 m zigzag run, and ended with a 10 m casualty drag weighing approximately 79.4 kg. RESULTS: Pearson correlations showed significant (P≤.05) strong correlations between lower body strength (r=-0.63, -0.62), lower body power (r=-0.67, -0.67) and upper body strength (r=-0.60, -0.62) and overall performance times in the unloaded and loaded condition, respectively. CONCLUSION: Strength and power are strongly related to high-intensity military tasks with and without heavy load carriage.
Authors: Robin M Orr; Filip Kukić; Aleksandar Čvorović; Nenad Koropanovski; Radivoje Janković; Jay Dawes; Robert Lockie Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Justin J Merrigan; Jason D Stone; Andrew G Thompson; W Guy Hornsby; Joshua A Hagen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Tommi Ojanen; Keijo Häkkinen; Jaakko Hanhikoski; Heikki Kyröläinen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 3.390