| Literature DB >> 26101629 |
Isabel Walter1, Susanne Klaus1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to scrutinise the influence of maternal high-fat diet (mHFD) consumption during gestation and lactation on exercise performance and energy metabolism in male mouse offspring. Female C3H/HeJ mice were fed either a semi-synthetic high-fat diet (HFD; 40 % energy from fat) or a low-fat diet (LFD; 10 % energy from fat) throughout gestation and lactation. After weaning, male offspring of both groups received the LFD. At the age of 7·5 weeks half of the maternal LFD (n 20) and the mHFD (n 21) groups were given access to a running wheel for 28 d as a voluntary exercise training opportunity. We show that mHFD consumption led to a significantly reduced exercise performance (P < 0·05) and training efficiency (P < 0·05) in male offspring. There were no effects of maternal diet on offspring body weight. Lipid and glucose metabolism was disturbed in mHFD offspring, with altered regulation of cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36) (P < 0·001), fatty acid synthase (P < 0·05) and GLUT1 (P < 0·05) gene expression in skeletal muscle. In conclusion, maternal consumption of a HFD is linked to decreased exercise performance and training efficiency in the offspring. We speculate that this may be due to insufficient muscle energy supply during prolonged exercise training. Further, this compromised exercise performance might increase the risk of obesity development in adult life.Entities:
Keywords: CD36, cluster of differentiation 36; Cpt1b, carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1b; Esrrg, oestrogen-related receptor-γ; FAS, fatty acid synthase; HFD, high-fat diet; High-fat diet; LFD, low-fat diet; Offspring; REE, resting energy expenditure; RQ, respiratory quotient; RW, running wheel; Serca2, sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca ATPase 2; Skeletal muscle; Training; eWAT, epididymal white adipose tissue; mHFD, maternal high-fat diet; mLFD, maternal low-fat diet
Year: 2014 PMID: 26101629 PMCID: PMC4473145 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2014.55
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Sci ISSN: 2048-6790
Composition of the semi-synthetic low-fat diet (LFD) and high-fat diet (HFD)
| LFD | HFD | |
|---|---|---|
| Composition (g/kg diet) | ||
| Wheat starch | 386·5 | 172·5 |
| Casein | 220 | 267 |
| Maltodextrin | 100 | 100 |
| Sucrose | 100 | 100 |
| Dextrose | 50 | 50 |
| Fat* | 43 | 210 |
| Cellulose | 50 | 50 |
| Mineral mix (AIN-93G-MX) | 35 | 35 |
| Vitamin mix (AIN-93-VX) | 10 | 10 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| Choline bitartrate | 2·5 | 2·5 |
| Total energy (kJ/g diet) | 16·2 | 19·7 |
| % Energy from carbohydrates | 66·9 | 36·8 |
| % Energy from protein | 23·1 | 23·0 |
| % Energy from fat | 10·0 | 40·2 |
* Combination of sunflower-seed oil (70 %), coconut oil (18 %) and flaxseed oil (12 %).
Fig. 1.Influence of maternal high-fat diet (mHFD) on offspring body mass and composition. (a) Body mass development of male mice offspring from two dietary groups with or without running wheel (RW) access (n 10–11 per group). -■-, mHFD with RW access (mHFD + RW); -□-, mHFD without RW access (mHFD–RW); -▴-, maternal low-fat diet (mLFD) with RW access (mLFD + RW); -▵-, mLFD without RW access (mLFD–RW). Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. Body mass data were analysed by repeated-measures ANOVA. * Mean values were significantly different between the groups (P < 0·05). (b) Body composition of male mice offspring from two dietary groups with (RW+) or without (RW–) RW access (n 10–11 per group). □, mLFD; , mHFD. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. Body composition at week 7 was compared by Student's t test and at week 12 by two-way ANOVA. Main effects for maternal diet and/or exercise are stated.
Influence of maternal high-fat diet (mHFD) on offspring energy metabolism and activity
(Mean values with their standard errors)
| No exercise (–RW) | Exercise ( + RW) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mLFD | mHFD | mLFD | mHFD | ANOVA: | ||||||
| Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | Maternal diet | Exercise | |||||
| Before exercise (week 6) | ||||||||||
| Food intake (kJ/animal per d) | 43·81 | 2·7 | 50·41 | 2·23 | NS* | |||||
| REE (kJ/h) | 36·17 | 0·80 | 32·83 | 1·15 | <0·05* | |||||
| REE RQ | 0·77 | 0·01 | 0·76 | 0·01 | NS* | |||||
| After exercise (week 12) | ||||||||||
| Food intake (kJ/animal per d) | 54·35 | 4·59 | 62·0 | 2·20 | 63·55 | 2·20 | 59·0 | 5·08 | NS | NS |
| TEE (kJ/h) | 57·51 | 2·63 | 59·39 | 1·14 | 59·32 | 0·81 | 58·42 | 1·37 | NS | NS |
| REE (kJ/h) | 38·55 | 1·26 | 41·22 | 1·29 | 39·26 | 0·95 | 38·32 | 1·25 | NS | NS |
| REE RQ | 0·798 | 0·01 | 0·81 | 0·02 | 0·764 | 0·008 | 0·750 | 0·007 | NS | <0·0001 |
| RW usage at night (rotations/night) | – | – | 15730 | 1778 | 14020 | 1485 | NS | – | ||
| Activity at night (counts/night per 1000) | 42·79 | 6·29 | 46·45 | 3·76 | 65·06 | 64·24 | 70·26 | 4·50 | NS | <0·0001 |
RW, running wheel; mLFD, maternal low-fat diet; REE, resting energy expenditure; RQ, respiratory quotient; TEE, total energy expenditure.
* t test.
Fig. 2.Influence of maternal high-fat diet (mHFD; ) on offspring exercise capacity and training response. (a) Exercise test before voluntary training (b), after 4 weeks of voluntary training and (c) training efficiency of male mice offspring from two dietary groups with running wheel (RW) access (RW+) or without RW access (RW–) (n 10–11 per group). □, Maternal low-fat diet (mLFD). Exercise capacity was measured using an incremental treadmill running test to exhaustion protocol. Training efficiency was calculated as the difference in exercise capacity before and after voluntary exercise training for each mouse. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. Exercise data were compared by Student's t test before RW access and by two-way ANOVA after RW access. Main effects for maternal diet and/or exercise are stated. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the mLFD mice within the same exercise group (P < 0·05).
Fig. 3.Influence of maternal high-fat diet (mHFD; ) on offspring tissue mass, and TAG and glycogen content. Liver mass (a), liver TAG content (b), liver glycogen content (c), muscle mass (d), muscle TAG content (e), muscle glycogen content (f) and epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT) mass of maternal low-fat diet (mLFD; □) and mHFD male offspring. Half of both groups had access to a running wheel (RW+) for 4 weeks; half were without access (RW–). Values are means (n 10–11 per group), with standard errors represented by vertical bars. Data were compared by two-way ANOVA. Main effects for maternal diet and/or exercise are stated. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the mLFD mice within the same exercise group (P < 0·05). † Mean value was marginally significantly different from that of the mLFD mice within the same exercise group (P = 0·06).
Fig. 4.Influence of maternal high-fat diet (mHFD; ) on offspring muscle gene and protein expression. Gene expression of sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca ATPase 1 (SERCA1) (a), SERCA2 (b) and cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36) (c), protein expression of CD36 relative to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (d), and gene expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS) (e) and carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1b (CPT1b) (f) in skeletal muscle of maternal low-fat diet (mLFD; □) and mHFD male offspring. Half of both groups had access to a running wheel (RW+) for 4 weeks; half were without access (RW–). Values are means (n 10–11 per group), with standard errors represented by vertical bars. Data were compared by two-way ANOVA. Main effects for maternal diet and/or exercise are stated. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the mLFD mice within the same exercise group (P < 0·05). † Mean value was marginally significantly different from that of the mLFD mice within the same exercise group (P = 0·05).
Effect of maternal high-fat diet (mHFD) on offspring muscle gene expression and physiology (week 12)
(Mean values with their standard errors)
| No exercise (–RW) | Exercise ( + RW) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mLFD | mHFD | mLFD | mHFD | ANOVA: | ||||||
| Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | Maternal diet | Exercise | |||||
| Mitochondrial biogenesis and activity | ||||||||||
| PGC1α mRNA | 0·999 | 0·10 | 1·258 | 0·22 | 1·19 | 0·22 | 1·154 | 0·15 | NS | NS |
| Citrate synthase activity | 20·77 | 0·65 | 20·64 | 1·17 | 22·84 | 0·61 | 22·01 | 1·44 | NS | NS |
| Esrrg mRNA | 1·00 | 0·15 | 1·64 | 0·14 | 1·24 | 0·13 | 1·69 | 0·18 | <0·001 | NS |
| Glucose uptake | ||||||||||
| GLUT1 mRNA | 1·00 | 0·21 | 0·58 | 0·04 | 0·74 | 0·10 | 0·61 | 0·07 | <0·05 | NS |
| GLUT4 mRNA | 1·00 | 0·13 | 1·10 | 0·10 | 1·34 | 0·18 | 1·28 | 0·12 | NS | NS |
RW, running wheel; mLFD, maternal low-fat diet; PGC1α, PPAR-γ, coactivator 1α; Essrg, oestrogen-related receptor-γ.