Literature DB >> 26101291

Science in the court: pitfalls, challenges and solutions.

Éadaoin O'Brien1, Niamh Nic Daeid2, Sue Black2.   

Abstract

We are at a critical juncture for the forensic sciences. A number of high-profile reports and a growing body of literature question and critically reflect on core issues pertaining to the methodologies informing forensic science and their effective use within the criminal justice system. We argue for the need for an improved association and outline key areas that require attention from practitioners operating within the fields of both forensic science and law.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  expert evidence; forensic science; judicial confidence

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26101291      PMCID: PMC4581010          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  5 in total

1.  More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions.

Authors:  I W Evett; G Jackson; J A Lambert
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 2.  The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements.

Authors:  I W Evett; G Jackson; J A Lambert; S McCrossan
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  2000 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  Can bad science be good evidence? Neuroscience, lie detection, and beyond.

Authors:  Frederick Schauer
Journal:  Cornell Law Rev       Date:  2010-09

4.  Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  A model for case assessment and interpretation.

Authors:  R Cook; I W Evett; G Jackson; P J Jones; J A Lambert
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.124

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.