Literature DB >> 26101083

Comparison of disinfectant efficacy when using high-volume directed mist application of accelerated hydrogen peroxide and peroxymonosulfate disinfectants in a large animal hospital.

N T Saklou1, B A Burgess1,2, D C Van Metre1, K J Hornig1, P S Morley1, S R Byers1.   

Abstract

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: Effective decontamination of animal holding environments is critical for providing high quality patient care and maintaining a safe working environment. Disinfection of animal holding environments is a significant challenge during times of epidemic disease.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the disinfectant efficacy of 3 strategies for high-volume directed mist application of accelerated hydrogen peroxide and peroxymonosulfate disinfectants; 4.25% accelerated hydrogen peroxide (Accel(®) ; AHP) at a 1:16 dilution and single and double applications of 2% peroxymonosulfate solution (Virkon-S(®) ; VIR-1 and VIR-2) for decontamination of a large animal hospital environment. STUDY
DESIGN: Experiment.
METHODS: After cleaning and disinfection of the hospital environment, transparencies experimentally contaminated with known concentrations of Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were placed on vertical surfaces. Disinfectant solution was applied by directed mist application and, after 30 min of contact time, transparencies were collected and individually placed into tubes containing 10 ml Dey-Engley broth. The process was repeated for each disinfectant. Tenfold dilutions of each sample were plated onto tryptic soy blood agar with 5% sheep blood. Bacterial counts from transparencies exposed to disinfectants were compared with counts from control transparencies (unexposed to disinfectants) to evaluate reduction in colony forming units.
RESULTS: The least squares mean reduction (log10 ) in colony forming units (CFUs) for S. aureus and P. aeruginosa was 1.5-2.5 logs and approximately 0.8-1.0 logs for S. enterica. Reductions were generally largest for VIR-2 and smallest for AHP, although these differences were not all statistically significant and the magnitude of differences may not be clinically relevant.
CONCLUSIONS: For the organisms evaluated, all 3 disinfectants applied as a directed mist were effective at reducing CFUs in a veterinary hospital environment. Effective disinfection using this method of application is dependent on adequate cleaning prior to application, and use of adequate volumes of disinfectant.
© 2015 EVJ Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biosecurity; cleaning; disinfection; horse; infection control

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26101083     DOI: 10.1111/evj.12476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Equine Vet J        ISSN: 0425-1644            Impact factor:   2.888


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Efficacy of Disinfectant Footmats for the Reduction of Bacterial Contamination on Footwear in a Large Animal Veterinary Hospital.

Authors:  K J Hornig; B A Burgess; N T Saklou; V Johnson; A Malmlov; D C Van Metre; P S Morley; S R Byers
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  Salmonella in Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Chelsea L Holschbach; Simon F Peek
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.357

3.  Environmental Recovery of Nosocomial Bacteria in a Companion Animal Shelter Before and After Infection Control Procedures.

Authors:  Sara Horsman; Hester Rynhoud; Xiaoyan Zhou; Ricardo J Soares Magalhães; Justine S Gibson; Erika Meler
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-20

4.  Evaluation of a Biocide Used in the Biological Isolation and Containment Unit of a Veterinary Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Catarina Geraldes; Cláudia Verdial; Eva Cunha; Virgílio Almeida; Luís Tavares; Manuela Oliveira; Solange Gil
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27

5.  Controlling bacteriological contamination of environmental surfaces at the biological isolation and containment unit of a veterinary teaching hospital.

Authors:  C Verdial; C Carneiro; I Machado; L Tavares; V Almeida; M Oliveira; S Gil
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.146

6.  Effect of Different Disinfectants on Bacterial Aerosol Diversity in Poultry Houses.

Authors:  Linlin Jiang; Meng Li; Jinxiu Tang; Xiaoyu Zhao; Jianlong Zhang; Hongwei Zhu; Xin Yu; Youzhi Li; Tao Feng; Xingxiao Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.