Literature DB >> 26100724

Comparing catchment sediment fingerprinting procedures using an auto-evaluation approach with virtual sample mixtures.

Leticia Palazón1, Borja Latorre2, Leticia Gaspar3, William H Blake4, Hugh G Smith5, Ana Navas2.   

Abstract

Information on sediment sources in river catchments is required for effective sediment control strategies, to understand sediment, nutrient and pollutant transport, and for developing soil erosion management plans. Sediment fingerprinting procedures are employed to quantify sediment source contributions and have become a widely used tool. As fingerprinting procedures are naturally variable and locally dependant, there are different applications of the procedure. Here, the auto-evaluation of different fingerprinting procedures using virtual sample mixtures is proposed to support the selection of the fingerprinting procedure with the best capacity for source discrimination and apportionment. Surface samples from four land uses from a Central Spanish Pyrenean catchment were used i) as sources to generate the virtual sample mixtures and ii) to characterise the sources for the fingerprinting procedures. The auto-evaluation approach involved comparing fingerprinting procedures based on four optimum composite fingerprints selected by three statistical tests, three source characterisations (mean, median and corrected mean) and two types of objective functions for the mixing model. A total of 24 fingerprinting procedures were assessed by this new approach which were solved by Monte Carlo simulations and compared using the root mean squared error (RMSE) between known and assessed source ascriptions for the virtual sample mixtures. It was found that the source ascriptions with the highest accuracy were achieved using the corrected mean source characterisations for the composite fingerprints selected by the Kruskal Wallis H-test and principal components analysis. Based on the RMSE results, high goodness of fit (GOF) values were not always indicative of accurate source apportionment results, and care should be taken when using GOF to assess mixing model performance. The proposed approach to test different fingerprinting procedures using virtual sample mixtures provides an enhanced basis for selecting procedures that can deliver optimum source discrimination and apportionment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mixing model; River catchments; Sediment contribution; Sediment fingerprinting; Sediment source ascription

Year:  2015        PMID: 26100724     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  8 in total

1.  Tracing sediment sources in a mountainous forest catchment under road construction in northern Iran: comparison of Bayesian and frequentist approaches.

Authors:  Kazem Nosrati; Arman Haddadchi; Adrian L Collins; Saeedeh Jalali; Mohammad Reza Zare
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Exploring innovative techniques for identifying geochemical elements as fingerprints of sediment sources in an agricultural catchment of Argentina affected by soil erosion.

Authors:  Romina Torres Astorga; Sergio de Los Santos Villalobos; Hugo Velasco; Olgioly Domínguez-Quintero; Renan Pereira Cardoso; Roberto Meigikos Dos Anjos; Yacouba Diawara; Gerd Dercon; Lionel Mabit
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The representation of sediment source group tracer distributions in Monte Carlo uncertainty routines for fingerprinting: An analysis of accuracy and precision using data for four contrasting catchments.

Authors:  Simon Pulley; Adrian L Collins; J Patrick Laceby
Journal:  Hydrol Process       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.565

4.  Investigating the importance of recreational roads as a sediment source in a mountainous catchment using a fingerprinting procedure with different multivariate statistical techniques and a Bayesian un-mixing model.

Authors:  Kazem Nosrati; Adrian L Collins
Journal:  J Hydrol (Amst)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.722

5.  Fingerprinting sub-basin spatial sediment sources in a large Iranian catchment under dry-land cultivation and rangeland farming: Combining geochemical tracers and weathering indices.

Authors:  Zeinab Mohammadi Raigani; Kazem Nosrati; Adrian L Collins
Journal:  J Hydrol Reg Stud       Date:  2019-08

6.  Sediment source fingerprinting: benchmarking recent outputs, remaining challenges and emerging themes.

Authors:  Adrian L Collins; Martin Blackwell; Pascal Boeckx; Charlotte-Anne Chivers; Monica Emelko; Olivier Evrard; Ian Foster; Allen Gellis; Hamid Gholami; Steve Granger; Paul Harris; Arthur J Horowitz; J Patrick Laceby; Nuria Martinez-Carreras; Jean Minella; Lisa Mol; Kazem Nosrati; Simon Pulley; Uldis Silins; Yuri Jacques da Silva; Micheal Stone; Tales Tiecher; Hari Ram Upadhayay; Yusheng Zhang
Journal:  J Soils Sediments       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.308

7.  Tracing catchment fine sediment sources using the new SIFT (SedIment Fingerprinting Tool) open source software.

Authors:  S Pulley; A L Collins
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Fingerprinting the spatial sources of fine-grained sediment deposited in the bed of the Mehran River, southern Iran.

Authors:  Atefe Fatahi; Hamid Gholami; Yahya Esmaeilpour; Aboalhasan Fathabadi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.