Literature DB >> 26100073

Asymmetrical frontal cortical activity associated with differential risk for mood and anxiety disorder symptoms: An RDoC perspective.

Robin Nusslock1, Keegan Walden2, Eddie Harmon-Jones3.   

Abstract

The recently launched NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative aims to examine the relationship between core biobehavioral dimensions and symptom profiles that either cut across traditional disorder categories or that are unique to specific clinical phenomenon. A biobehavioral construct that has received considerable attention and that is directly relevant to the Positive Valence Systems domain of the RDoC initiative is approach motivation. One way approach motivation is frequently operationalized is left versus right frontal electroencephalographic (EEG) activity, with greater relative left frontal EEG activity reflecting increased approach motivation and decreased relative left frontal EEG activity reflecting decreased approach motivation or increased withdrawal tendencies. The objective of the present review paper is to examine the relationship between relative left frontal EEG activity and mood and anxiety related symptoms from an RDoC perspective. We first provide an overview of the approach-withdrawal motivational model of frontal EEG asymmetry. Second, we review evidence that relative left frontal EEG activity is associated with a differential risk for unipolar depression versus bipolar disorder. Third, and in line with the mission statement of the RDoC, we move beyond considering mood and anxiety disorders as unitary constructs or homogenous disorders and instead propose that individual differences in relative left frontal EEG activity may be uniquely associated with specific symptom clusters of depression (i.e., anhedonia), hypomania/mania (i.e., symptoms characterized by excessive approach motivation), and anxiety (i.e., anxious apprehension versus anxious arousal). Identifying the relationship between relative left frontal EEG activity and specific mood and anxiety-related symptom clusters has important implications for clinical science, assessment, and treatment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Approach-motivation; Frontal EEG asymmetry; Mood/anxiety symptoms; RDoC

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26100073     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  30 in total

1.  Abnormal approach-related motivation but spared reinforcement learning in MDD: Evidence from fronto-midline Theta oscillations and frontal Alpha asymmetry.

Authors:  Davide Gheza; Jasmina Bakic; Chris Baeken; Rudi De Raedt; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Comorbid anxiety moderates the relationship between depression history and prefrontal EEG asymmetry.

Authors:  Robin Nusslock; Alexander J Shackman; Brenton W McMenamin; Lawrence L Greischar; Richard J Davidson; Maria Kovacs
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Frontal brain asymmetry, childhood maltreatment, and low-grade inflammation at midlife.

Authors:  Camelia E Hostinar; Richard J Davidson; Eileen K Graham; Daniel K Mroczek; Margie E Lachman; Teresa E Seeman; Carien M van Reekum; Gregory E Miller
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 4.905

4.  Women with Major Depressive Disorder, Irrespective of Comorbid Anxiety Disorders, Show Blunted Bilateral Frontal Responses during Win and Loss Anticipation.

Authors:  Jennifer L Stewart; Evan J White; Rayus Kuplicki; Elisabeth Akeman; Jerzy Bodurka; Yoon-Hee Cha; Justin S Feinstein; Sahib S Khalsa; Jonathan B Savitz; Teresa A Victor; Martin P Paulus; Robin L Aupperle
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Intergenerational Transmission of Frontal Alpha Asymmetry Among Mother-Infant Dyads.

Authors:  Kaylin E Hill; Wei Siong Neo; Alexis Hernandez; Lisa R Hamrick; Bridgette L Kelleher; Dan Foti
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-12-17

6.  Research Domain Criteria: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Potential Alternatives for Future Psychiatric Research.

Authors:  Christopher A Ross; Russell L Margolis
Journal:  Mol Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2019-08-13

Review 7.  Advancing the study of sluggish cognitive tempo via DSM, RDoC, and hierarchical models of psychopathology.

Authors:  Stephen P Becker; Erik G Willcutt
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  Laboratory-induced learned helplessness attenuates approach motivation as indexed by posterior versus frontal theta activity.

Authors:  Samantha J Reznik; Robin Nusslock; Narun Pornpattananangkul; Lyn Y Abramson; James A Coan; Eddie Harmon-Jones
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Depression symptom dimensions and asymmetrical frontal cortical activity while anticipating reward.

Authors:  Brady D Nelson; Ellen M Kessel; Daniel N Klein; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 10.  [Twelve years of research domain criteria in psychiatric research and practice: claim and reality].

Authors:  Dusan Hirjak; Emanuel Schwarz; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 1.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.