Literature DB >> 26099890

Application of a Laparoscopic, Single-port, Double-needle Technique for Pediatric Hydroceles With Multiple Peritoneal Folds: A Trial From a Single-center 5-Year Experience.

Yonghui Peng1, Canqiang Li2, Weibin Lin1, Le Xu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report our 5-year experience with a modified single-port, double-needle, minilaparoscopic technique for patent processus vaginalis with multiple peritoneal folds in the hydrocele sac orifice.
METHODS: A total of 125 consecutive cases of boys with unilateral pediatric hydrocele underwent minilaparoscopic repair between June 2008 and June 2013. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 65 patients who underwent a 2-port laparoscopic procedure, during which a 3-mm grasping forceps was used to grasp the folds around the internal inguinal ring. Group 2 included 60 patients who received a modified single-port, double-needle, minilaparoscopic surgery. An Endo Close needle was used to spread the peritoneal folds and facilitate circular extraperitoneal suturing in group 2. The principal outcome factors were assessed between the groups.
RESULTS: A total of 151 minilaparoscopic procedures were performed in 125 patients (age range, 12-68 months; median, 21.5 months). In total, 26 extra procedures were performed for simultaneous repair of a potential contralateral patent processus vaginalis. No significant difference in operation time was noted between group 1 and group 2 (25.9 ± 6.4 vs 27.1 ± 5.5 minutes). The procedures were performed successfully without serious preoperative complications. During a median follow-up period of 18 months (range, 6-36 months), no postoperative hydrocele recurrence was encountered.
CONCLUSION: Our limited experience suggests that the modified single-port, double-needle, minilaparoscopic technique could be safe, effective, and more cosmetically appealing for the management of complicated pediatric hydroceles.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26099890     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.01.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  A comparison between totally laparoscopic hydrocelectomy and scrotal incision hydrocelectomy with laparoscopic high ligation for pediatric cord hydrocele.

Authors:  Byung Seo Choi; Geon Young Byun; Seong Bae Hwang; Bum Hwan Koo; Sung Ryul Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis concerning single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele.

Authors:  Yi Chen; Furan Wang; Hongji Zhong; Junfeng Zhao; Yan Li; Zhan Shi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic vs. Open Repair Surgery for the Treatment of Communicating Hydrocele in Children: A Retrospective Study From a Single Center.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Rui Tang; Xiao Wang; Bangzhi Sui; Zhiyuan Jin; Xudong Xu; Qinghua Zhu; Jin Chen; Honglong Ma; Guangqi Duan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-05-12

4.  Laparoscopic management of infantile hydrocele in pediatric age group.

Authors:  Ahmed Elhaddad; Mohamed Awad; Sherif M Shehata; Mohamed A Shehata
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Umbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for patent processus vaginalis in boys: incision-hiding and solo-like surgery.

Authors:  Yuanhong Xiao; Zhou Shen
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Does the laparoscopic treatment of paediatric hydroceles represent a better alternative to the traditional open repair technique? A retrospective study of 1332 surgeries performed at two centres in China.

Authors:  Y Zhang; M Chao; X Zhang; Z Wang; D Fan; K Zhang; Y Cai; C Liang
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.739

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.