Literature DB >> 26099624

Management of recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer in Germany: results of the nationwide AGO pattern of care studies from the years 2013, 2009 and 2006.

Marco Johannes Battista1, Marcus Schmidt2, Michael Eichbaum3,4, Katrin Almstedt2, Anne-Sophie Heimes2, Peter Mallmann5,4, Gerald Hoffmann2, Eric Steiner6,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The available literature on the treatment options for recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer (EC) is full of controversies. Therefore, we explore the results of the AGO pattern of care studies from the years 2013, 2009 and 2006.
METHODS: A questionnaire was developed and sent to all 682 German gynecological departments in 2013 (775 in 2009, 500 in 2006, respectively). The results of the questionnaires were compared with each other using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: Responses were available in 40.0 % in 2013, 33.3 % in 2009 and 35.8 % in 2006. In 2013 the most preferred endocrine drug was progestin (79.8 %), followed by tamoxifen (42.8 %), aromatase inhibitor (19.8 %), fulvestrant (16.3 %) and a combination (3.9 %) (p < 0.001). 65.3, 59.8, 51.7 and 38.2 % of the participants used platinum, taxane, a combination of cytostatic drugs, anthracycline in metastatic EC, respectively (p = 0.215). 96.2, 92.7, 49.8 and 60.9 % of the participants performed an operation, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy and chemotherapy in 2013 because of a local recurrence, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared to 2009 and 2006 these rates remained stable (no p value <0.05). Because of a distant metastasis 50.4, 64.2, 78.5 and 90.8 % of the participants performed an operation, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy and chemotherapy in 2013, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared to 2009 and 2006 more participants performed an operation or radiotherapy and less an endocrine treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Whereas progestin was the favorite drug, the participants of this study did not prefer a specific cytostatic drug for metastatic EC in 2013. This might have reflected the available literature, which did not provide a real standard of care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Endocrine treatment; Endometrial cancer; Pattern of care; Radiotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26099624     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3786-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  2 in total

1.  Management of Metastatic Endometrial Cancer: Physicians' Choices Beyond the First Line. A MITO Survey.

Authors:  Gaia Giannone; Daniele Castaldo; Valentina Tuninetti; Giulia Scotto; Margherita Turinetto; Anna Amela Valsecchi; Michele Bartoletti; Serafina Mammoliti; Grazia Artioli; Giorgia Mangili; Vanda Salutari; Domenica Lorusso; Gennaro Cormio; Claudio Zamagni; Antonella Savarese; Massimo Di Maio; Graziana Ronzino; Carmela Pisano; Sandro Pignata; Giorgio Valabrega
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  Estrogen Signaling in Endometrial Cancer: a Key Oncogenic Pathway with Several Open Questions.

Authors:  Adriana C Rodriguez; Zannel Blanchard; Kathryn A Maurer; Jason Gertz
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.869

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.