| Literature DB >> 26099446 |
An Ravelingien1, Veerle Provoost2, Elia Wyverkens3, Ann Buysse3, Petra De Sutter4, Guido Pennings2.
Abstract
The aim of this qualitative study was to explore how recipients viewed payment of sperm donors. The study was conducted in Belgium, where, as in many countries, sperm donors receive recompense for their time and expenses. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with 34 heterosexual and lesbian couples who, at the time of data collection, had at least one donor-conceived child aged 7-10 years or who were undergoing donor conception treatment. Although participants commonly described the issue of financial compensation as something that did not really concern them, all supported the idea that some level of payment was acceptable or even necessary. The participants also identified several ways in which donor payment offered advantages to their own position as (future) parents. Although the idea is commonly rehearsed that sperm donation is a gift and that monetary transaction for conception is demeaning, the participants of this study did not generally share this view. To them, a small financial return served as a symbolic acknowledgement of the donor's contribution and helped secure the type of relationship they expected from their donor. There was clearly concern, however, over high payments and the risk of attracting the wrong kind of donor.Entities:
Keywords: artificial reproduction; donor conception; ethics; payment; qualitative research
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26099446 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.04.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biomed Online ISSN: 1472-6483 Impact factor: 3.828