Literature DB >> 26099446

Recipients' views on payment of sperm donors.

An Ravelingien1, Veerle Provoost2, Elia Wyverkens3, Ann Buysse3, Petra De Sutter4, Guido Pennings2.   

Abstract

The aim of this qualitative study was to explore how recipients viewed payment of sperm donors. The study was conducted in Belgium, where, as in many countries, sperm donors receive recompense for their time and expenses. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with 34 heterosexual and lesbian couples who, at the time of data collection, had at least one donor-conceived child aged 7-10 years or who were undergoing donor conception treatment. Although participants commonly described the issue of financial compensation as something that did not really concern them, all supported the idea that some level of payment was acceptable or even necessary. The participants also identified several ways in which donor payment offered advantages to their own position as (future) parents. Although the idea is commonly rehearsed that sperm donation is a gift and that monetary transaction for conception is demeaning, the participants of this study did not generally share this view. To them, a small financial return served as a symbolic acknowledgement of the donor's contribution and helped secure the type of relationship they expected from their donor. There was clearly concern, however, over high payments and the risk of attracting the wrong kind of donor.
Copyright © 2015 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial reproduction; donor conception; ethics; payment; qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26099446     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  4 in total

1.  Payment to gamete donors: equality, gender equity, or solidarity?

Authors:  C Samorinha; C De Freitas; I Baía; H Machado; E Vale-Fernandes; S Silva
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Good practice recommendations for information provision for those involved in reproductive donation.

Authors:  Jackson Kirkman-Brown; Carlos Calhaz-Jorge; Eline A F Dancet; Kersti Lundin; Mariana Martins; Kelly Tilleman; Petra Thorn; Nathalie Vermeulen; Lucy Frith
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-02-16

3.  Digital health interventions for healthy ageing: a qualitative user evaluation and ethical assessment.

Authors:  Marcello Ienca; Christophe Schneble; Reto W Kressig; Tenzin Wangmo
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Absence or presence? Complexities in the donor narratives of single mothers using sperm donation.

Authors:  S Zadeh; T Freeman; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.918

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.