Literature DB >> 26099234

Mixed Expectations: Effects of Goal Ambivalence during Pregnancy on Maternal Well-Being, Stress, and Coping.

Svenja H Koletzko1, Pearl La Marca-Ghaemmaghami1, Veronika Brandstätter1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesised that experiencing ambivalence toward the childbearing goal would be related to indicators of well-being, stress, and coping among women with planned pregnancies.
METHODS: Study 1 (N = 208) tested cross-sectional associations between goal ambivalence and measures of well-being, stress, and coping. It also included a postpartum measurement point (N = 71) to examine prospective effects of goal ambivalence. Study 2 (N = 109) extended the investigation to within-person effects in a three-week daily diary assessment.
RESULTS: In Study 1, goal ambivalence in pregnant women was positively associated with depressive symptoms, perceived stress, and pregnancy-specific avoidance-oriented coping, and negatively associated with coping self-efficacy. Goal ambivalence also predicted changes in life satisfaction, depressive symptoms, perceived stress, and coping self-efficacy postpartum. Study 2 revealed within-person effects of daily fluctuations in goal ambivalence on day-to-day changes in positive emotions, negative activation, and avoidance-oriented coping.
CONCLUSIONS: Ambivalence towards the childbearing goal is a source of significant distress to pregnant women with planned pregnancies and its effects seem to extend into the postpartum period. These findings may have important clinical implications for maternal and child well-being. Future studies should examine whether goal ambivalence during pregnancy affects the maternal-child relationship in the long term.
© 2015 The International Association of Applied Psychology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coping; daily diary; goal ambivalence; pregnancy; stress; well-being

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26099234     DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Health Well Being        ISSN: 1758-0854


  9 in total

1.  The benefits of personal strengths in mental health of stressed students: A longitudinal investigation.

Authors:  Wenjie Duan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The Latina Birth Weight Paradox: the Role of Subjective Social Status.

Authors:  Jill Fleuriet; Thankam Sunil
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-09-15

Review 3.  Conceptualization, measurement, and effects of pregnancy-specific stress: review of research using the original and revised Prenatal Distress Questionnaire.

Authors:  Sirena M Ibrahim; Marci Lobel
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-06-10

4.  Qualitative investigation of the factors that generate ambivalent feelings in women who give birth after receiving negative results from non-invasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Junko Yotsumoto; Akihiko Sekizawa; Satomi Inoue; Nobuhiro Suzumori; Osamu Samura; Takahiro Yamada; Kiyonori Miura; Hideaki Masuzaki; Hideaki Sawai; Jun Murotsuki; Haruka Hamanoue; Yoshimasa Kamei; Toshiaki Endo; Akimune Fukushima; Yukiko Katagiri; Naoki Takeshita; Masaki Ogawa; Haruki Nishizawa; Yoko Okamoto; Shinya Tairaku; Takashi Kaji; Kazuhisa Maeda; Keiichi Matsubara; Masanobu Ogawa; Hisao Osada; Takashi Ohba; Yukie Kawano; Aiko Sasaki; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Measurement instruments for parental stress in the postpartum period: A scoping review.

Authors:  Anne-Martha Utne Øygarden; Rigmor C Berg; Abdallah Abudayya; Kari Glavin; Benedicte Sørensen Strøm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Development and psychometric properties of the maternal ambivalence scale in spanish women.

Authors:  Magdalena Belén Martín-Sánchez; Verónica Martínez-Borba; Patricia Catalá; Jorge Osma; Cecilia Peñacoba-Puente; Carlos Suso-Ribera
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 3.105

7.  Motherhood in the Time of Coronavirus: The Impact of the Pandemic Emergency on Expectant and Postpartum Women's Psychological Well-Being.

Authors:  Sara Molgora; Monica Accordini
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-26

8.  Validation of the Italian version of the Revised Prenatal Coping Inventory (NuPCI) and its correlations with pregnancy-specific stress.

Authors:  Chiara Penengo; Chiara Colli; Marco Garzitto; Lorenza Driul; Maddalena Cesco; Matteo Balestrieri
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Protecting Breastfeeding during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review of Perinatal Care Recommendations in the Context of Maternal and Child Well-Being.

Authors:  Aleksandra Wesołowska; Magdalena Orczyk-Pawiłowicz; Agnieszka Bzikowska-Jura; Małgorzata Gawrońska; Bartłomiej Walczak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.