Literature DB >> 26099164

Adverse psychological outcomes following colposcopy and related procedures: a systematic review.

M O'Connor1, P Gallagher2, J Waller3, C M Martin4, J J O'Leary4, L Sharp5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although colposcopy is the leading follow-up option for women with abnormal cervical cytology, little is known about its psychological consequences.
OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review to examine: (1) what, if any, are the adverse psychological outcomes following colposcopy and related procedures; (2) what are the predictors of adverse psychological outcomes post-colposcopy; and (3) what happens to these outcomes over time. SEARCH STRATEGY: Five electronic databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched for studies published in English between January 1986 and February 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible studies assessed psychological wellbeing at one or more time-points post-colposcopy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. Full texts of potentially eligible papers were reviewed. Data were abstracted from, and a quality appraisal performed of, eligible papers. MAIN
RESULTS: Twenty-three papers reporting 16 studies were eligible. Colposcopy and related procedures can lead to adverse psychological outcomes, particularly anxiety. Ten studies investigated predictors of adverse psychological outcomes; management type and treatment had no impact on this. Seven studies investigated temporal trends in psychological outcomes post-colposcopy; findings were mixed, especially in relation to anxiety and distress. Studies were methodologically heterogeneous.
CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up investigations and procedures for abnormal cervical cytology can cause adverse psychological outcomes among women. However, little is known about the predictors of these outcomes or how long they persist. There is a need for a more standardised approach to the examination of the psychological impact of colposcopy, especially longer-term outcomes. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Follow-up investigations for abnormal cervical cytology can cause adverse psychological outcome among women.
© 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse psychological outcomes; anxiety; cervix; colposcopy; screening; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26099164     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  14 in total

Review 1.  Health-related quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D in the prevention, screening and management of cervical disease: A systematic review.

Authors:  A Ó Céilleachair; J F O'Mahony; M O'Connor; J O'Leary; C Normand; C Martin; L Sharp
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Role of cervical cytology in surveillance after radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Alaina J Brown; Jaimin S Shah; Nicole D Fleming; Alpa M Nick; Pamela T Soliman; Gary B Chisholm; Kathleen M Schmeler; Pedro T Ramirez; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Estimated Quality of Life and Economic Outcomes Associated With 12 Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  George F Sawaya; Erinn Sanstead; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Karen Smith-McCune; Steven E Gregorich; Michael J Silverberg; Wendy Leyden; Megan J Huchko; Miriam Kuppermann; Shalini Kulasingam
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Pre-Procedural Anxiety and Associated Factors Among Women Seeking for Cervical Cancer Screening Services in Shenzhen, China: Does Past Screening Experience Matter?

Authors:  Wei Lin; Weikang Huang; Chaofan Mei; Chuyan Zhong; Leilei Zhu; Peiyi Liu; Shixin Yuan; Zhihua Liu; Yueyun Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  'I Want the Whole Package'. Elderly Patients' Preferences for Follow-Up After Abnormal Cervical Test Results: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Pia Kirkegaard; Line Winther Gustafson; Lone Kjeld Petersen; Berit Andersen
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Estimating HPV DNA Deposition Between Sexual Partners Using HPV Concordance, Y Chromosome DNA Detection, and Self-reported Sexual Behaviors.

Authors:  Talía Malagón; Ann N Burchell; Mariam El-Zein; Julie Guénoun; Pierre-Paul Tellier; François Coutlée; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Do no harm: no psychological harm from colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Benedicte Kirkøen; Paula Berstad; Edoardo Botteri; Tone Lise Åvitsland; Alvilde Maria Ossum; Thomas de Lange; Geir Hoff; Tomm Bernklev
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Equal Management of Equal Risks: What Should be Used as the Standard for Cervical Cancer Prevention?

Authors:  Walter K Kinney; Rebecca B Perkins; George F Sawaya
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Role of Colposcopy after Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Authors:  Annu Heinonen; Maija Jakobsson; Mari Kiviharju; Seppo Virtanen; Karoliina Aro; Maria Kyrgiou; Pekka Nieminen; Ilkka Kalliala
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Psychological distress in cervical cancer screening: results from a German online survey.

Authors:  M Jentschke; R Lehmann; N Drews; A Hansel; M Schmitz; P Hillemanns
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.