Literature DB >> 26098460

The Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging for Detection of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Measuring Up to 2 cm: A Meta-Analysis.

Andrea S Kierans1, Stella K Kang1, Andrew B Rosenkrantz1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the performance of dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of small (≤2-cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to identify factors that influence this performance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline and Embase databases were searched for studies performed from January 2000 to March 2014 in which the performance of MR imaging was reported for the detection of HCC up to 2 cm on either a lesion- or patient-based level, with sufficient data to construct 2 × 2 contingency tables. Diagnostic performance was quantitatively pooled for all studies by using a bivariate random-effects model with exploration involving subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and determination of study heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies with 1387 small HCC lesions in 1908 patients met inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity was higher for sensitivity (range, 30%-99%) than specificity (range, 61%-100%). Overall sensitivity was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68%, 85%; I(2) = 89%), and overall specificity was 92% (95% CI: 88%, 95%; I(2) = 69%). The primary potential source of bias was use of explant as the reference standard in only 13% of studies, although lower sensitivity in such studies was not significant (59% vs 80%, P = .165). Sensitivities were significantly higher for studies that originated from Asia compared with those that originated elsewhere (89% vs 71%, P = .028), those performed with hepatobiliary phase imaging compared with those without (87% vs 65%, respectively; P = .004), and those in which gadoxetate disodium was used versus an extracellular agent (92% vs 67%, P ≤ .001). Specificity was not significantly different between subgroups (P ≥ .122). At pairwise meta-regression analysis with either study origin from Asia or performance of hepatobiliary phase imaging, only gadoxetate disodium contrast agent showed significant independent association with higher sensitivity (P = .002-.007).
CONCLUSION: Results of this meta-analysis suggest that dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging has moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity in the detection of HCC up to 2 cm. Gadoxetate disodium contrast agent showed the strongest association with increased sensitivity. © RSNA, 2015

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26098460     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  31 in total

Review 1.  Lessons learnt from pathologic imaging correlation in the liver: an historical perspective.

Authors:  Yvonne Purcell; Pauline Copin; Valérie Paradis; Valérie Vilgrain; Maxime Ronot
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.519

4.  Performance of adding hepatobiliary phase image in magnetic resonance imaging for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jielin Pan; Wenjuan Li; Lingjing Gu; Chaoran Liu; Ke Zhang; Guobin Hong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  LR-3 and LR-4 Lesions Are More Likely to Be Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Transplant Patients with LR-5 or LR-TR Lesions.

Authors:  Tzu-Hao Lee; Nathan Hirshman; Diana M Cardona; Carl L Berg; Kathryn J Fowler; Mustafa R Bashir; James Ronald
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Hepatocellular carcinoma detection in liver cirrhosis: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT vs. MRI with extracellular contrast vs. gadoxetic acid.

Authors:  Sahar Semaan; Naik Vietti Violi; Sara Lewis; Manjil Chatterji; Christopher Song; Cecilia Besa; James S Babb; M Isabel Fiel; Myron Schwartz; Swan Thung; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Caudate Lobe Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sequential Transarterial Chemoembolization and Iodine 125 Seeds Implantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Liangliang Yan; Lei Chen; Kun Qian; Xuefeng Kan; Hongsen Zhang; Bin Liang; Chuansheng Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Non-contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus the Multiphase Computed Tomography with Respect to the Asia-Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Diagnostic Performance Study for Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Yang Wei; Liu Haifen; Li Xiang; Zhang Shutong; Chen Yanhao; Wang Xiang
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Highly sensitive Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of α-fetoprotein is a predictive marker for hepatocarcinogenesis in long-term observation of patients with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Kazuaki Tabu; Seiichi Mawatari; Kohei Oda; Ohki Taniyama; Ai Toyodome; Sho Ijuin; Haruka Sakae; Kotaro Kumagai; Shuji Kanmura; Akio Ido
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29

Review 10.  Overall diagnostic accuracy of different MR imaging sequences for detection of dysplastic nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jingtong Xiong; Jiawen Luo; Jie Bian; Jianlin Wu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.