Literature DB >> 26098364

Ecological and Landscape Drivers of Neonicotinoid Insecticide Detections and Concentrations in Canada's Prairie Wetlands.

Anson R Main1, Nicole L Michel2, John V Headley3, Kerry M Peru3, Christy A Morrissey1,4.   

Abstract

Neonicotinoids are commonly used seed treatments on Canada's major prairie crops. Transported via surface and subsurface runoff into wetlands, their ultimate aquatic fate remains largely unknown. Biotic and abiotic wetland characteristics likely affect neonicotinoid presence and environmental persistence, but concentrations vary widely between wetlands that appear ecologically (e.g., plant composition) and physically (e.g., depth) similar for reasons that remain unclear. We conducted intensive surveys of 238 wetlands, and documented 59 wetland (e.g., dominant plant species) and landscape (e.g., surrounding crop) characteristics as part of a novel rapid wetland assessment system. We used boosted regression tree (BRT) analysis to predict both probability of neonicotinoid analytical detection and concentration. BRT models effectively predicted the deviance in neonicotinoid detection (62.4%) and concentration (74.7%) from 21 and 23 variables, respectively. Detection was best explained by shallow marsh plant species identity (34.8%) and surrounding crop (13.9%). Neonicotinoid concentration was best explained by shallow marsh plant species identity (14.9%) and wetland depth (14.2%). Our research revealed that plant composition is a key indicator and/or driver of neonicotinoid presence and concentration in Prairie wetlands. We recommend wetland buffers consisting of diverse native vegetation be retained or restored to minimize neonicotinoid transport and retention in wetlands, thereby limiting their potential effects on wetland-dependent organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26098364     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Comparative chronic toxicity of three neonicotinoids on New Zealand packaged honey bees.

Authors:  Sarah C Wood; Ivanna V Kozii; Roman V Koziy; Tasha Epp; Elemir Simko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Improving distribution models of riparian vegetation with mobile laser scanning and hydraulic modelling.

Authors:  Tua Nylén; Elina Kasvi; Jouni Salmela; Harri Kaartinen; Antero Kukko; Anttoni Jaakkola; Juha Hyyppä; Petteri Alho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Mass Balance Assessment for Six Neonicotinoid Insecticides During Conventional Wastewater and Wetland Treatment: Nationwide Reconnaissance in United States Wastewater.

Authors:  Akash M Sadaria; Samuel D Supowit; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Translocation of the neonicotinoid seed treatment clothianidin in maize.

Authors:  Adam Alford; Christian H Krupke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of imidacloprid ingestion on immune responses to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  J Hernandez; A Volland; B J Leyshon; M Juda; J M Ridlon; R W Johnson; A J Steelman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic insecticides. Part 1: new molecules, metabolism, fate, and transport.

Authors:  Chiara Giorio; Anton Safer; Francisco Sánchez-Bayo; Andrea Tapparo; Andrea Lentola; Vincenzo Girolami; Maarten Bijleveld van Lexmond; Jean-Marc Bonmatin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 4.223

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.