Literature DB >> 26098252

Comparison of Cine-MRI and Transthoracic Echocardiography for the Assessment of Aortic Root Diameters in Patients with Suspected Marfan Syndrome.

P Bannas1, M Rybczynski2, S Sheikhzadeh2, Y von Kodolitsch2, T Derlin1, J Yamamura1, G Lund1, G Adam1, M Groth3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with Marfan syndrome require repeated imaging for monitoring of aortic root aneurysms. Therefore, we evaluated the agreement and reproducibility of cine-MRI and echocardiography measurements of the sinuses of Valsalva in patients with suspected Marfan syndrome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 51 consecutive patients with suspected Marfan syndrome were prospectively examined using cine-MRI and echocardiography. Two readers independently measured aortic root diameters at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva in both cine-MRI and echocardiography. Statistics included intraclass correlation coefficient, Pearson correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, and two-sided t-test.
RESULTS: In 38 of the 51 individuals (74.5 %), the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome was established according to the criteria of the Ghent-2 nosology. Cine-MRI measurements of the sinuses of Valsalva revealed a strong correlation with echocardiography (r = 0.929), but a statistically significant bias of -1.0  mm (p < 0.001). The mean absolute diameter for sinuses of Valsalva obtained by cine-MRI was 32.3  ±  5.8 mm as compared to 33.4  ±  5.4 mm obtained by echocardiography. Interobserver agreement of measurements of the sinuses of Valsalva was higher for cine-MRI than for echocardiography (p = 0.029).
CONCLUSION: Despite small, but statistically significant differences in terms of agreement and reproducibility, cine-MRI and echocardiographic measurements of aortic root diameters provide comparable results without a significant clinical difference. Therefore both techniques may be used for monitoring of the aortic root in patients with Marfan syndrome. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26098252     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1553224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  4 in total

1.  Non-contrast MR angiography at 1.5 Tesla for aortic monitoring in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery.

Authors:  Simon Veldhoen; Cyrus Behzadi; Alexander Lenz; Frank Oliver Henes; Meike Rybczynski; Yskert von Kodolitsch; Thorsten Alexander Bley; Gerhard Adam; Peter Bannas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 5.364

2.  Application of Whole Exome Sequencing and Functional Annotations to Identify Genetic Variants Associated with Marfan Syndrome.

Authors:  Min-Rou Lin; Che-Mai Chang; Jafit Ting; Jan-Gowth Chang; Wan-Hsuan Chou; Kuei-Jung Huang; Gloria Cheng; Hsiao-Huang Chang; Wei-Chiao Chang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-01

3.  Comparison of cine cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography derived diameters of the aortic root in a large population-based cohort.

Authors:  Jan-Per Wenzel; Julius Nikorowitsch; Ramona Bei der Kellen; Luisa Dohm; Evaldas Girdauskas; Gunnar Lund; Peter Bannas; Stefan Blankenberg; Tilo Kölbel; Ersin Cavus; Kai Müllerleile; Michael Gerhard Kaul; Gerhard Adam; Julius Matthias Weinrich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  The Progress of Advanced Ultrasonography in Assessing Aortic Stiffness and the Application Discrepancy between Humans and Rodents.

Authors:  Wenqian Wu; Mingxing Xie; Hongyu Qiu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.