Literature DB >> 26097153

The influence of mesh topology in the abdominal wall repair process.

Carmelo De Maria1,2, Silvia Burchielli3, Claudia Salvadori4, Vito Santoro1, Francesca Montemurro1, Gianni Orsi1, Giovanni Vozzi1,2.   

Abstract

The tissue integration and the formation of adhesions in the repair of abdominal wall defects are principally led to the topology and the mechanical properties of implanted prosthesis. In this study we analyzed the influence of the topology of the meshes for abdominal wall repair, made of polypropylene (PP), evaluating its ability to prevent and to minimize the formation of adhesions, and to promote tissue ingrowth. Two series of in vivo studies were performed. In the first, two types of PP meshes, a lightweight macroporous mesh (LWM) and a heavyweight microporous mesh (HWM) were compared with determine the optimal porosity for tissue integration. In the second, a composite mesh, Clear Mesh Composite (CMC), made of a LWM sewn on a PP planar smooth film, was compared with a PP planar film, to demonstrate how two different topologies of same material are able to induce different tissue integration with the abdominal wall and different adhesion with internal organs. In both studies, the prostheses were implanted in Wistar rats and histological analysis and mechanical characterization of tissue coupled with the implants were performed. LWM showed better host tissue ingrowth in comparison to HWM. CMC prosthesis showed no adhesions to the viscera and no strong foreign body reaction, moreover its elasticity and anisotropy index were more similar to that of natural tissue. These results demonstrated that the surface morphology of PP surgical meshes allowed to modulate their repair ability.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 104B: 1220-1228, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  histological analysis; in vivo study; mechanical properties; polypropylene mesh; surface morphology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26097153     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  4 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical, Topological and Chemical Features That Influence the Implant Success of an Urogynecological Mesh: A Review.

Authors:  Carmelo De Maria; Vito Santoro; Giovanni Vozzi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Repair of primary and incisional hernias using composite mesh fixed with absorbable tackers: preliminary experience of a laparoscopic approach with a newly designed mesh in 29 cases.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Alice Marzetti; Silvia Vigna; Daniela Prando; Raffaele Porfidia; Salomone Di Saverio
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-04-13

3.  A new technique for tension-free reconstruction in large incisional hernia.

Authors:  Gabriele Munegato; Landino Fei; Michele Schiano di Visconte; Danilo Da Ros; Luana Moras; Gabriele Bellio
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-10-13

Review 4.  The 4 Principles of Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ibrahim Khansa; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-12-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.