Kristel Schaap1, Yvette Christopher-De Vries1, Évelyne Cambron-Goulet2, Hans Kromhout1. 1. Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Division of Environmental Epidemiology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 2. Département des sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aims to identify work-related and personal factors associated with workers' exposure to static magnetic fields (SMF) and motion-induced time-varying magnetic fields (TVMF) from MRI scanners. METHODS: Measurements of personal exposure to SMF and TVMF were performed among MRI staff during 439 work shifts at 14 different workplaces using portable magnetic field dosimeters. These data were coupled with contextual workplace and worker information. After data cleanup, 324 remaining observations were used to develop linear mixed effects models for various measures of peak and time-weighted average (TWA) exposure. RESULTS: Exposure levels near whole-body closed-bore scanners increased by 30% to 76% for each additional tesla of scanner strength, depending on exposure metric. Small-bore animal scanners, on the other hand, showed a reversed association with scanner strength. Measures of peak and TWA exposure were differently associated with specific tasks and scan procedures. In addition, body height of the worker was negatively associated with measured exposure levels. CONCLUSION: The study revealed workplace characteristics, scan activities, and personal characteristics associated with SMF and TVMF exposure levels of MRI staff and was able to quantify the unique contribution of each of these factors while adjusting for the presence of others.
PURPOSE: This study aims to identify work-related and personal factors associated with workers' exposure to static magnetic fields (SMF) and motion-induced time-varying magnetic fields (TVMF) from MRI scanners. METHODS: Measurements of personal exposure to SMF and TVMF were performed among MRI staff during 439 work shifts at 14 different workplaces using portable magnetic field dosimeters. These data were coupled with contextual workplace and worker information. After data cleanup, 324 remaining observations were used to develop linear mixed effects models for various measures of peak and time-weighted average (TWA) exposure. RESULTS: Exposure levels near whole-body closed-bore scanners increased by 30% to 76% for each additional tesla of scanner strength, depending on exposure metric. Small-bore animal scanners, on the other hand, showed a reversed association with scanner strength. Measures of peak and TWA exposure were differently associated with specific tasks and scan procedures. In addition, body height of the worker was negatively associated with measured exposure levels. CONCLUSION: The study revealed workplace characteristics, scan activities, and personal characteristics associated with SMF and TVMF exposure levels of MRI staff and was able to quantify the unique contribution of each of these factors while adjusting for the presence of others.
Authors: Mahsa Fatahi; Jolanta Karpowicz; Krzysztof Gryz; Amirmohammad Fattahi; Georg Rose; Oliver Speck Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Valentina Hartwig; Giorgio Virgili; F Ederica Mattei; Cristiano Biagini; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Francesco Campanella; Luigi Landini; Fabriziomaria Gobba; Alberto Modenese; Giulio Giovannetti Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2021-09-29 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Anna Sannino; Stefania Romeo; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Raffaele d'Angelo; Antonella Petrillo; Vincenzo Cerciello; Roberta Fusco; Olga Zeni Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2017-12-18
Authors: Evridiki Batistatou; Anna Mölter; Hans Kromhout; Martie van Tongeren; Stuart Crozier; Kristel Schaap; Penny Gowland; Stephen F Keevil; Frank de Vocht Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 4.402