Literature DB >> 26096296

Capecitabine combined with docetaxel versus vinorelbine followed by capecitabine maintenance medication for first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer: Phase 3 randomized trial.

Jiayu Wang1, Binghe Xu1, Peng Yuan1, Fei Ma1, Qing Li1, Pin Zhang1, Ruigang Cai1, Ying Fan1, Yang Luo1, Qiao Li1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this prospective study, progression-free survival (PFS) and the safety profiles of docetaxel/capecitabine (TX) and vinorelbine/capecitabine (NX) followed by capecitabine maintenance therapy were compared in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
METHODS: Patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to a TX group (n = 104) and an NX group (n = 102), both of which included capecitabine maintenance medication. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: The trial met its primary endpoint and was closed to accrual subsequent to interim analysis. Forty-eight patients in the TX group (46.2%) and 42 patients in the NX group (41.2%) received maintenance medication. The median PFS (8.4 vs 7.1 months; P = .0026; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.3; hazard ratio, 1.65), the response duration (7.8 vs 6.6 months; P = .0451), and the median overall survival (OS) (35.3 vs 19.8 months; P = .1349; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.47; hazard ratio, 1.48) in the TX group appeared to be longer compared with those in the NX group, although the difference did reach not statistical significance. Patients aged ≥40 years who were postmenopausal and presented with visceral metastases were more likely to benefit from the TX regimen in terms of PFS and OS, whereas positive hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status or a history of taxane treatments did not affect differences in PFS and OS between the TX and NX groups. Hand-foot syndrome occurred more frequently in the TX group than in the NX group (47% vs 16.7%; P < .0001), but the frequencies of other minor adverse effects were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: A TX regimen for advanced breast cancer followed by capecitabine maintenance medication led to longer PFS and response duration than an NX regimen, even for patients who had previously received taxane in (neo)adjuvant settings. Cancer 2015.
© 2015 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2015;121:3435-43. © 2015 American Cancer Society. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advanced breast cancer; capecitabine; docetaxel; maintenance therapy; vinorelbine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26096296     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  5 in total

1.  Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Siao-Nge Hoon; Peter Kh Lau; Alison M White; Max K Bulsara; Patricia D Banks; Andrew D Redfern
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 2.  Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing palbociclib with chemotherapy agents for the treatment of postmenopausal women with HR-positive and HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Florence R Wilson; Abhishek Varu; Debanjali Mitra; Chris Cameron; Shrividya Iyer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Case Series Study.

Authors:  Reyad Dada; Mohamed El Sayed; Jamal Zekri
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2016-11-16

4.  Comparison of capecitabine-based regimens with platinum-based regimens in Chinese triple-negative breast cancer patients with liver metastasis.

Authors:  Yimeng Chen; Yin Guan; Jiayu Wang; Fei Ma; Yang Luo; Shanshan Chen; Pin Zhang; Qing Li; Ruigang Cai; Qiao Li; Hongnan Mo; Ying Fan; Weihong Zhao; Binghe Xu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

5.  The prognosis and risk factors for capecitabine maintenance treatment in metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Can Tian; Jianbo Yang; Ning Xie; Yu Tang; Haoyu Zhou; Zhe-Yu Hu; Quchang Ouyang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.