| Literature DB >> 26096029 |
Elisabet Clua1, Rosa Tur2, Buenaventura Coroleu3, Ignacio Rodríguez4, Montserrat Boada3, M José Gómez3, Pedro Nolasc Barri3, Anna Veiga5.
Abstract
Multiple pregnancies involve high obstetric and perinatal risks. The aim of this study is to evaluate, in a pilot randomized control study, if the cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) are comparable to the ones obtained with elective double embryo transfer (eDET). A total of 65 patients with at least two good quality embryos was randomized, 34 (52.3%) assigned to the eSET group and 31 (47.7%) to the eDET group. The cumulative pregnancy rates (eSET: 73.5% and eDET: 77.4%. RR: 0.95 95% CI: 0.72-1.25) and live birth rates (eSET: 58.8% and eDET: 61.3%. RR: 0.96 95% CI: 0.64-1.42) were similar in the two groups. The twin pregnancy rate in the fresh transfers of eDET group was 47.7% and 0% in the eSET group. The medical team decided to interrupt the study for reasons related to risks associated with elevated twin pregnancy rate, leaving low numbers of patients within the study as a result. When considering cumulative success rates, eSET and eDET are similar in terms of efficacy. However, eDET involves an increased and unacceptable twin pregnancy rate. The only prevention strategy is single embryo transfer.Entities:
Keywords: cumulative pregnancy rate; elective double embryo transfer (eDET); elective single embryo transfer (eSET); multiple pregnancy; oocyte donation
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26096029 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.04.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biomed Online ISSN: 1472-6483 Impact factor: 3.828