Literature DB >> 26095821

Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results Between Partial Meniscectomy and Refixation of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.

Kyu Sung Chung1, Jeong Ku Ha2, Cheol Hyun Yeom2, Ho Jong Ra3, Ho Su Jang2, Seung Hyuk Choi2, Jin Goo Kim4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and radiologic results of partial meniscectomy with those of refixation in patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) at a minimum 5-year follow-up.
METHODS: Between 2005 and 2009, patients with MMPRTs who had been followed up for at least 5 years after a partial meniscectomy (group M, n = 20) or pullout repair (group R, n = 37) were recruited. The mean follow-up duration was 67.5 months in group M and 72.0 months in group R. Clinical assessments, including the Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form score, and radiographic assessments, including the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade and medial joint space width, were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up. We compared the preoperative results with the final results in each group, and we compared the final results of groups M and R. Five-year survival rates were also evaluated.
RESULTS: The mean Lysholm score (P = .039) and IKDC score (P = .037) improved significantly. However, the width of the medial joint space (P < .001) and K-L grade (P < .001) worsened significantly in both groups. When we compared the final results, group R had significantly better Lysholm scores (P = .002) and IKDC scores (P < .001) than group M. Group R showed less K-L grade progression (P = .005) and less medial joint space narrowing (P < .001) than group M. The rate of conversion to total knee arthroplasty was 35% in group M, whereas there was no conversion to total knee arthroplasty in group R. The 5-year survival rates in groups M and R were 75% and 100%, respectively (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: For MMPRTs, refixation was more effective than partial meniscectomy in terms of the clinical and radiologic outcomes and survival for at least 5 years' follow-up. Refixation slowed the progression of arthritic changes compared with partial meniscectomy, although it did not prevent the progression of arthrosis completely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26095821     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  43 in total

1.  A simple cinch is superior to a locking loop for meniscus root repair: a human biomechanical comparison of suture constructs in a transtibial pull-out model.

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Nick R Johnson; Isabella T Wu; Patrick A Smith; Michael J Stuart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A Transosseous Bone Bridge Repair for Posterior Horn Meniscal Root Tears During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jonathan M Frank; Daniel J Liechti; Jack Anavian; Thomas R Hackett
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-02-27

3.  Safety, Feasibility, and Radiographic Outcomes of the Anterior Meniscal Takedown Technique to Approach Chondral Defects on the Tibia and Posterior Femoral Condyle: A Matched Control Study.

Authors:  Gergo Merkely; Tom Minas; Takahiro Ogura; Jakob Ackermann; Alexandre Barbieri Mestriner; Andreas H Gomoll
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Meniscal tear morphology independently affects pain relief following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in middle-aged patients.

Authors:  Masayuki Kamimura; Jutaro Umehara; Atsushi Takahashi; Yu Mori; Daisuke Chiba; Yoshiyuki Kuwahara; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Meniscal Root Tears: Current Concepts Review.

Authors:  Santiago Pache; Zachary S Aman; Mitchell Kennedy; Gilberto Y Nakama; Gilbert Moatshe; Connor Ziegler; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-07

6.  Partial meniscectomy provides no benefit for symptomatic degenerative medial meniscus posterior root tears.

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Nick R Johnson; Rohith Mohan; Diane L Dahm; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Transosseous Medial Meniscal Root Repair Using a Modified Mason-Allen Suture Configuration.

Authors:  Chad D Lavender; Shane R Hanzlik; Paul E Caldwell; Sara E Pearson
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-12-07

8.  Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair Using a Transtibial Technique.

Authors:  Jarret M Woodmass; Rohith Mohan; Michael J Stuart; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-05-01

Review 9.  [Meniscal root lesions: clinical relevance and treatment].

Authors:  S Kopf; C Stärke; R Becker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Pullout fixation for medial meniscus posterior root tears: clinical results were not age-dependent, but osteoarthritis progressed.

Authors:  Kyu Sung Chung; Jeong Ku Ha; Ho Jong Ra; Han Sung Lee; Dhong Won Lee; Jung Ho Park; Du Han Kim; Jin Goo Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.