Literature DB >> 26095679

Does Experience Rating Improve Obstetric Practices? Evidence from Italy.

Sofia Amaral-Garcia1, Paola Bertoli2, Veronica Grembi3.   

Abstract

Using inpatient discharge records from the Italian region of Piedmont, we estimate the impact of an increase in malpractice pressure brought about by experience-rated liability insurance on obstetric practices. Our identification strategy exploits the exogenous location of public hospitals in court districts with and without schedules for noneconomic damages. We perform difference-in-differences analysis on the entire sample and on a subsample which only considers the nearest hospitals in the neighborhood of court district boundaries. We find that the increase in medical malpractice pressure is associated with a decrease in the probability of performing a C-section from 2.3 to 3.7 percentage points (7-11.6%) with no consequences for medical complications or neonatal outcomes. The impact can be explained by a reduction in the discretion of obstetric decision-making rather than by patient cream skimming.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-sections JEL K13; I13; K32; experience rating; medical liability insurance; scheduled damages

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26095679     DOI: 10.1002/hec.3210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  2 in total

1.  Perspectives of Italian pregnant women on pregnancy examinations and pregnancy care: is the caregiver more important than the care?

Authors:  Ugo Indraccolo; Simona Cona; Alexandra Nistor; Salvatore Renato Indraccolo; Romolo Di Iorio; Piergiorgio Fedeli; Carlo De Angelis
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-03-31

2.  Public and social environment changes and caesarean section delivery choice in Japan.

Authors:  Michio Yuda
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-09-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.