Stefan L S Kwa1, Abrahim Al-Mamgani2, Sarah O S Osman2, Anne Gangsaas2, Peter C Levendag2, Ben J M Heijmen2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: s.kwa@erasmusmc.nl. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to verify clinical target volume--planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins in single vocal cord irradiation (SVCI) of T1a larynx tumors and characterize inter- and intrafraction target motion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 42 patients, a single vocal cord was irradiated using intensity modulated radiation therapy at a total dose of 58.1 Gy (16 fractions × 3.63 Gy). A daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was performed to online correct the setup of the thyroid cartilage after patient positioning with in-room lasers (interfraction motion correction). To monitor intrafraction motion, CBCT scans were also acquired just after patient repositioning and after dose delivery. A mixed online-offline setup correction protocol ("O2 protocol") was designed to compensate for both inter- and intrafraction motion. RESULTS: Observed interfraction, systematic (Σ), and random (σ) setup errors in left-right (LR), craniocaudal (CC), and anteroposterior (AP) directions were 0.9, 2.0, and 1.1 mm and 1.0, 1.6, and 1.0 mm, respectively. After correction of these errors, the following intrafraction movements derived from the CBCT acquired after dose delivery were: Σ = 0.4, 1.3, and 0.7 mm, and σ = 0.8, 1.4, and 0.8 mm. More than half of the patients showed a systematic non-zero intrafraction shift in target position, (ie, the mean intrafraction displacement over the treatment fractions was statistically significantly different from zero; P<.05). With the applied CTV-PTV margins (for most patients 3, 5, and 3 mm in LR, CC, and AP directions, respectively), the minimum CTV dose, estimated from the target displacements observed in the last CBCT, was at least 94% of the prescribed dose for all patients and more than 98% for most patients (37 of 42). The proposed O2 protocol could effectively reduce the systematic intrafraction errors observed after dose delivery to almost zero (Σ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: With adequate image guidance and CTV-PTV margins in LR, CC, and AP directions of 3, 5, and 3 mm, respectively, excellent target coverage in SVCI could be ensured.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to verify clinical target volume--planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins in single vocal cord irradiation (SVCI) of T1a larynx tumors and characterize inter- and intrafraction target motion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 42 patients, a single vocal cord was irradiated using intensity modulated radiation therapy at a total dose of 58.1 Gy (16 fractions × 3.63 Gy). A daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was performed to online correct the setup of the thyroid cartilage after patient positioning with in-room lasers (interfraction motion correction). To monitor intrafraction motion, CBCT scans were also acquired just after patient repositioning and after dose delivery. A mixed online-offline setup correction protocol ("O2 protocol") was designed to compensate for both inter- and intrafraction motion. RESULTS: Observed interfraction, systematic (Σ), and random (σ) setup errors in left-right (LR), craniocaudal (CC), and anteroposterior (AP) directions were 0.9, 2.0, and 1.1 mm and 1.0, 1.6, and 1.0 mm, respectively. After correction of these errors, the following intrafraction movements derived from the CBCT acquired after dose delivery were: Σ = 0.4, 1.3, and 0.7 mm, and σ = 0.8, 1.4, and 0.8 mm. More than half of the patients showed a systematic non-zero intrafraction shift in target position, (ie, the mean intrafraction displacement over the treatment fractions was statistically significantly different from zero; P<.05). With the applied CTV-PTV margins (for most patients 3, 5, and 3 mm in LR, CC, and AP directions, respectively), the minimum CTV dose, estimated from the target displacements observed in the last CBCT, was at least 94% of the prescribed dose for all patients and more than 98% for most patients (37 of 42). The proposed O2 protocol could effectively reduce the systematic intrafraction errors observed after dose delivery to almost zero (Σ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: With adequate image guidance and CTV-PTV margins in LR, CC, and AP directions of 3, 5, and 3 mm, respectively, excellent target coverage in SVCI could be ensured.
Authors: Mohamed Shelan; Lukas Anschuetz; Adrian D Schubert; Beat Bojaxhiu; Alan Dal Pra; Frank Behrensmeier; Daniel M Aebersold; Roland Giger; Olgun Elicin Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Hoon Sik Choi; Bae Kwon Jeong; Hojin Jeong; Jin Ho Song; Jin Pyeong Kim; Jung Je Park; Seung Hoon Woo; Ki Mun Kang Journal: Radiat Oncol J Date: 2016-03-30
Authors: Ariel E Marciscano; Vivek Charu; Heather M Starmer; Simon R Best; Harry Quon; Alexander T Hillel; Lee M Akst; Ana P Kiess Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Olgun Elicin; Ekin Ermiş; Christoph Oehler; Daniel M Aebersold; Francesca Caparrotti; Frank Zimmermann; Gabriela Studer; Guido Henke; Lukas Adam; Lukas Anschuetz; Mahmut Ozsahin; Matthias Guckenberger; Mohamed Shelan; Nuri Kaydıhan; Oliver Riesterer; Robin J D Prestwich; Thierry Spielmann; Roland Giger; Mehmet Şen Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 6.244