Literature DB >> 26093266

Outcome of monochorionic twins conceived by assisted reproduction.

Teresinha Simões1, Alexandra Queirós1, Ana Teresa Marujo1, Sandra Valdoleiros1, Patricia Silva1, Isaac Blickstein2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate monochorionic twins conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART).
DESIGN: We compared perinatal outcomes of monochorionic twins conceived by ART with their dichorionic counterparts and with spontaneous monochorionic twins.
SETTING: Referral center. PATIENT(S): Mothers to monochorionic and dichorionic twins conceived by ART and spontaneous monochorionic twins. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Maternal characteristics, pregnancy complications, and perinatal outcomes. RESULT(S): Monochorionic twin pregnancies (n = 25) comprise 7.2% of all ART twins and 4.9% of all monochorionic twins in this data set. Monochorionic pairs have a significantly worse outcome compared with dichorionic sets in terms of lower gestational age and birth weight. ART appears to increase the already high risk of monochorionicity compared with spontaneous conception: odds ratio (OR), 2.9 (1.1-7.3) for preterm birth at <32 weeks and OR, 5.9 (2.5-1.49) for birth weight <1,500 g. CONCLUSION(S): Monochorionic twins after ART are at increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with spontaneous monochorionic twins and with dichorionic twins conceived by ART.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monochorionic twins; assisted reproduction; pregnancy complications

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26093266     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators.

Authors:  Tuangsit Wataganara; Arundhati Gosavi; Katika Nawapun; Pradip D Vijayakumar; Nisarat Phithakwatchara; Mahesh Choolani; Lin Lin Su; Arijit Biswas; Citra N Z Mattar
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Clinical outcomes after assisted reproductive technology in twin pregnancies: chorionicity-based comparison.

Authors:  Luming Sun; Gang Zou; Xing Wei; Yan Chen; Jun Zhang; Nanette Okun; Tao Duan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment: a comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Roy Homburg; Susanna Santagni; Giovanni Battista La Sala; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Perinatal outcome of monochorionic and dichorionic twins after spontaneous and assisted conception: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Karien E A Hack; Marijn E M S Vereycken; Helen L Torrance; Corine Koopman-Esseboom; Jan B Derks
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Factors associated with embryo splitting and clinical outcome of monozygotic twins in pregnancies after IVF and ICSI.

Authors:  A MacKenna; J E Schwarze; J Crosby; F Zegers-Hochschild
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-05-15

6.  The effect of early administration of rectal progesterone in IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies on the preterm birth rate: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Mona Mohamed Aboulghar; Yahia El-Faissal; Ahmed Kamel; Ragaa Mansour; Gamal Serour; Mohamed Aboulghar; Yomna Islam
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.