Literature DB >> 26093251

Performances of anaerobic and aerobic membrane bioreactors for the treatment of synthetic textile wastewater.

Adem Yurtsever1, Erkan Sahinkaya2, Özgür Aktaş3, Deniz Uçar4, Özer Çınar1, Zhiwei Wang5.   

Abstract

This study aims at comparatively evaluating anaerobic and aerobic MBRs for the treatment of azo-dye containing synthetic wastewater. Also, the filtration performances of AnMBR and AeMBR were compared under similar operating conditions. In both MBRs, high COD removal efficiencies were observed. Although almost complete color removal was observed in AnMBR, only partial (30-50%) color removal was achieved in AeMBR. AnMBR was successfully operated up to 9 L/(m(2)h) (LMH) and no chemical cleaning was required at 4.5 LMH for around 50 days. AeMBR was operated successfully up to 20 LMH. The filtration resistance of AnMBR was generally higher compared to AeMBR although reversible fouling rates were comparable. In both MBRs, offline chemical cleaning with NaOCl and sulfuric acid almost completely removed irreversible fouling and the resistances of chemically cleaned membranes were close to those of new membranes.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaerobic membrane bioreactor; Color removal; Fouling; Membrane bioreactor; Textile industry wastewater

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26093251     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  7 in total

1.  Rapid establishment of phenol- and quinoline-degrading consortia driven by the scoured cake layer in an anaerobic baffled ceramic membrane bioreactor.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Shun Wang; Xuesong Ren; Zhenhu Hu; Shoujun Yuan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Energy and greenhouse gas life cycle assessment and cost analysis of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactor systems: Influence of scale, population density, climate, and methane recovery.

Authors:  Sarah Cashman; Xin Ma; Janet Mosley; Jay Garland; Brian Crone; Xiaobo Xue
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  Treatment of synthetic wastewater and cheese whey by the anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor.

Authors:  Müge Paçal; Neslihan Semerci; Barış Çallı
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Simultaneous photocatalytic and microbial degradation of dye-containing wastewater by a novel g-C3N4-P25/photosynthetic bacteria composite.

Authors:  Xinying Zhang; Yan Wu; Gao Xiao; Zhenping Tang; Meiyin Wang; Fuchang Liu; Xuefeng Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Newly Designed Hydrolysis Acidification Flat-Sheet Ceramic Membrane Bioreactor for Treating High-Strength Dyeing Wastewater.

Authors:  Yue Jin; Dunqiu Wang; Wenjie Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Inhibiting effect of textile wastewater on the activity of sludge from the biological treatment process of the activated sludge plant.

Authors:  L Gebrati; M El Achaby; H Chatoui; M Laqbaqbi; J El Kharraz; F Aziz
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 7.  Membrane bioreactors for hospital wastewater treatment: recent advancements in membranes and processes.

Authors:  Yan Zhao; Yangbo Qiu; Natalie Mamrol; Longfei Ren; Xin Li; Jiahui Shao; Xing Yang; Bart van der Bruggen
Journal:  Front Chem Sci Eng       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.803

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.