Literature DB >> 26093190

Choice of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, etonogestrel implant or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception after aspiration abortion.

Jody E Steinauer1, Ushma D Upadhyay1, Abby Sokoloff2, Cynthia C Harper1, Justin T Diedrich3, Eleanor A Drey1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Women who have abortions are at high risk of contraception discontinuation and subsequent unintended pregnancy. The objective of this analysis was to identify factors associated with choice of highly effective, long-acting, progestin-only contraceptive methods after abortion. STUDY
DESIGN: Women presenting for surgical abortion who selected the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD), the progestin implant or the progestin injection (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or DMPA) as their postabortion contraceptives were recruited to participate in a 1-year prospective cohort study. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regression to identify factors associated with choosing long-acting reversible contraceptives (IUD or implant) compared to DMPA.
RESULTS: A total of 260 women, aged 18-45 years, enrolled in the study, 100 of whom chose the IUD, 63 the implant and 97 the DMPA. The women were 24.9 years old on average; 36% were black, and 29% were Latina. Fifty-nine percent had had a previous abortion, 66% a prior birth, and 55% were undergoing a second-trimester abortion. In multivariable analyses, compared with DMPA users, women who chose the IUD or the implant were less likely to be currently experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV); reported higher stress levels; weighed more; and were more likely to have finished high school, to have used the pill before and to report that counselors or doctors were helpful in making the decision (all significant at p<.05, see text for relative risk ratios and confidence intervals.) In addition, women who chose the IUD were less likely to be black (p<.01), and women who chose the implant were more likely to report that they would be unhappy to become pregnant within 6 months (p<.05) than DMPA users.
CONCLUSION: A variety of factors including race/ethnicity, past contraceptive use, feelings towards pregnancy, stress and weight were different between LARC and DMPA users. Notably, current IPV was associated with choice of DMPA over the IUD or implant, implying that a desire to choose a hidden method may be important to some women and should be included in counseling. IMPLICATIONS: In contraceptive counseling, after screening for IPV, assessing patient's stress and taking a history about past contraceptive use, clinicians should discuss whether these factors might affect a patient's choice of method.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Intimate partner violence; Long-acting reversible contraceptive; Postabortion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26093190     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  5 in total

1.  The effects of preabortion depressive symptoms on postabortion contraceptive effectiveness level chosen among women seeking abortions.

Authors:  Yassaman Vafai; Julia R Steinberg
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Experiences of Reproductive Coercion Among Latina Women and Strategies for Minimizing Harm: "The Path Makes Us Strong".

Authors:  Karen Trister Grace; Kamila A Alexander; Noelene K Jeffers; Elizabeth Miller; Michele R Decker; Jacquelyn Campbell; Nancy Glass
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Intimate Partner Violence and Effectiveness Level of Contraceptive Selection Post-Abortion.

Authors:  Laura B Drew; Mona Mittal; Marie E Thoma; Cynthia C Harper; Julia R Steinberg
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Menstrual Pattern and Characteristics of One-Rod and Two-Rod Levonorgestrel Implant Users.

Authors:  Eka Rusdianto Gunardi; Sulaeman Andrianto Susilo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2021-03-10

Review 5.  Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Morena Luigia Rocca; Anna Rita Palumbo; Federica Visconti; Costantino Di Carlo
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.