Literature DB >> 26093048

Distinct effects of ventral tegmental area NMDA and acetylcholine receptor blockade on conditioned reinforcement produced by food-associated cues.

R J Wickham1, W B Solecki1, E J Nunes1, N A Addy2.   

Abstract

Stimuli paired with rewards acquire reinforcing properties to promote reward-seeking behavior. Previous work supports the role of ventral tegmental area (VTA) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in mediating conditioned reinforcement elicited by drug-associated cues. However, it is not known whether these cholinergic mechanisms are specific to drug-associated cues or whether VTA cholinergic mechanisms also underlie the ability of cues paired with natural rewards to act as conditioned reinforcers. Burst firing of VTA dopamine (DA) neurons and the subsequent phasic DA release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) plays an important role in cue-mediated behavior and in the ability of cues to acquire reinforcing properties. In the VTA, both AChRs and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) regulate DA burst firing and phasic DA release. Here, we tested the role of VTA nAChRs, muscarinic AChRs (mAChRs), and NMDARs in the conditioned reinforcement elicited by a food-associated, natural reward cue. Subjects received 10 consecutive days of Pavlovian conditioning training where lever extension served as a predictive cue for food availability. On day 11, rats received bilateral VTA infusion of saline, AP-5 (0.1 or 1μg), mecamylamine (MEC: 3 or 30μg) or scopolamine (SCOP: 3 or 66.7μg) immediately prior to the conditioned reinforcement test. During the test, nosepoking into the active (conditioned reinforced, CR) noseport produced a lever cue while nosepoking on the inactive (non-conditioned reinforced, NCR) noseport had no consequence. AP-5 robustly attenuated conditioned reinforcement and blocked discrimination between CR and NCR noseports at the 1-μg dose. MEC infusion decreased responding for both CR and NCR while 66.7-μg SCOP disrupted the subject's ability to discriminate between CR and NCR. Together, our data suggest that VTA NMDARs and mAChRs, but not nAChRs, play a role in the ability of natural reward-associated cues to act as conditioned reinforcers.
Copyright © 2015 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NMDA receptor; conditioned reinforcement; incentive salience; muscarinic receptor; nicotinic receptor; ventral tegmental area

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26093048      PMCID: PMC4510872          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  56 in total

Review 1.  Cue dependency of nicotine self-administration and smoking.

Authors:  A R Caggiula; E C Donny; A R White; N Chaudhri; S Booth; M A Gharib; A Hoffman; K A Perkins; A F Sved
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Drugs of abuse and stress trigger a common synaptic adaptation in dopamine neurons.

Authors:  Daniel Saal; Yan Dong; Antonello Bonci; Robert C Malenka
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Subsecond dopamine release promotes cocaine seeking.

Authors:  Paul E M Phillips; Garret D Stuber; Michael L A V Heien; R Mark Wightman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Glutamate-like immunoreactivity is present within cholinergic neurons of the laterodorsal tegmental and pedunculopontine nuclei.

Authors:  J R Clements; D D Toth; D A Highfield; S J Grant
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 5.  The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction.

Authors:  T E Robinson; K C Berridge
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1993 Sep-Dec

6.  Relative roles of ventral striatal D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in responding with conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  G Wolterink; G Phillips; M Cador; I Donselaar-Wolterink; T W Robbins; B J Everitt
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Rewarding effects of the cholinergic agents carbachol and neostigmine in the posterior ventral tegmental area.

Authors:  Satoshi Ikemoto; Roy A Wise
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Pedunculopontine tegmental stimulation evokes striatal dopamine efflux by activation of acetylcholine and glutamate receptors in the midbrain and pons of the rat.

Authors:  Gina L Forster; Charles D Blaha
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Rewarding brain stimulation: role of tegmental cholinergic neurons that activate dopamine neurons.

Authors:  J S Yeomans; A Mathur; M Tampakeras
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Distribution of pontomesencephalic cholinergic neurons projecting to substantia nigra differs significantly from those projecting to ventral tegmental area.

Authors:  S A Oakman; P L Faris; P E Kerr; C Cozzari; B K Hartman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Opioid-induced rewards, locomotion, and dopamine activation: A proposed model for control by mesopontine and rostromedial tegmental neurons.

Authors:  Stephan Steidl; David I Wasserman; Charles D Blaha; John S Yeomans
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Ventral tegmental area muscarinic receptors modulate depression and anxiety-related behaviors in rats.

Authors:  Keri M Small; Eric Nunes; Shannon Hughley; Nii A Addy
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  Neurobiology of reward-related learning.

Authors:  Ewa Galaj; Robert Ranaldi
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Subanesthetic ketamine decreases the incentive-motivational value of reward-related cues.

Authors:  Christopher J Fitzpatrick; Jonathan D Morrow
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Cocaine, nicotine, and their conditioned contexts enhance consolidation of object memory in rats.

Authors:  Michael Wolter; Ethan Huff; Talia Speigel; Boyer D Winters; Francesco Leri
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Alpha1-adrenergic receptor blockade in the ventral tegmental area attenuates acquisition of cocaine-induced pavlovian associative learning.

Authors:  Wojciech B Solecki; Michał Kielbinski; Joanna Bernacka; Katarzyna Gralec; Adam Klasa; Kamil Pradel; Karolina Rojek-Sito; Ryszard Przewłocki
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.617

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.