| Literature DB >> 26092798 |
S Kilaru1, M Schuster2, M Latz2, S Das Gupta2, N Steinberg3, H Fones2, S J Gurr2, N J Talbot2, G Steinberg4.
Abstract
Understanding the cellular organization and biology of fungal pathogens requires accurate methods for genomic integration of mutant alleles or fluorescent fusion-protein constructs. In Zymoseptoria tritici, this can be achieved by integrating of plasmid DNA randomly into the genome of this wheat pathogen. However, untargeted ectopic integration carries the risk of unwanted side effects, such as altered gene expression, due to targeting regulatory elements, or gene disruption following integration into protein-coding regions of the genome. Here, we establish the succinate dehydrogenase (sdi1) locus as a single "soft-landing" site for targeted ectopic integration of genetic constructs by using a carboxin-resistant sdi1(R) allele, carrying the point-mutation H267L. We use various green and red fluorescent fusion constructs and show that 97% of all transformants integrate correctly into the sdi1 locus as single copies. We also demonstrate that such integration does not affect the pathogenicity of Z. tritici, and thus the sdi1 locus is a useful tool for virulence analysis in genetically modified Z. tritici strains. Furthermore, we have developed a vector which facilitates yeast recombination cloning and thus allows assembly of multiple overlapping DNA fragments in a single cloning step for high throughput vector and strain generation.Entities:
Keywords: Dominant selectable marker; Mycosphaerella graminicola; Septoria tritici blotch; Succinate dehydrogenase; Wheat pathogenic fungi
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26092798 PMCID: PMC4502457 DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.03.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fungal Genet Biol ISSN: 1087-1845 Impact factor: 3.495
Primers used in this study.
| Primer name | Direction | Sequence (5′–3′) |
|---|---|---|
| SK-Sep-10 | Sense | |
| SK-Sep-11 | Antisense | |
| SK-Sep-12 | Sense | |
| SK-Sep-13 | Antisense | CTTCCGTCGATTTCGAGACAGC |
| SK-Sep-14 | Sense | |
| SK-Sep-15 | Antisense | |
| SK-Sep-16 | Sense | ATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGAG |
| SK-Sep-19 | Antisense | GAGGAGTCGACAGCCAAGCTC |
| SK-Sep-25 | Sense | |
| SK-Sep-26 | Antisense | |
| SK-Sep-78 | Antisense | |
| SK-Sep-162 | Sense | GCGACGACGGACGAGGACAG |
Italics indicate part of the primer that is complementary with another DNA fragment, to be ligated by homologous recombination in S. cerevisiae.
Fig. 1Establishing the sdi locus as a “soft-landing” site for targeted integration of vectors in to the genome of Z. tritici. (A) Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of succinate dehydrogenase subunit Sdi1 of Z. tritici and U. maydis. Identical amino acids are highlighted by blue background. Note that that the critical histidine at position 267 in Z. tritici is conserved (indicated in red). A mutation of this amino acid to leucine confers resistance to carboxin (Scalliet et al., 2012). (B) Schematic drawing showing the organization of vector pCeGFP. The fluorescent protein eGFP is expressed under the Z. tritici α-tubulin (tub2) promoter. After integration into the sdi1 locus, the vector confers carboxin resistance due to a point mutation in the succinate dehydrogenase gene sdi1, which changes a histidine to leucine (H267L). Left and right border enable Agrobacterium tumefaciens-based transformation of Z. tritici. Note that fragments are not drawn to scale. For more accurate information on fragment sizes see main text. (C) Image illustrates the integration event of vector pCeGFP into the native sdi1 locus of Z. tritici. This co-integrates a carboxin-resistant sdi1H267L allele and cytoplasmic eGFP, expressed under the tub2 promoter. (D) Southern blot showing integration of pCeGFP into numerous strains. Note that single integration into the desired locus was found in all carboxin-resistant transformants. The size markers in the corresponding agarose gel are shown to the left. (E) Image showing cytoplasmic eGFP expression in yeast-like cells of Z. tritici after integration of pCeGFP in to the sdi1 locus. Bar represents 15 μm.
Fig. 2Pathogenicity of wild-type and carboxin-resistant Z. tritici strains, carrying various fluorescent proteins in their sdi1 locus. (A) Bar chart showing the degree of necrosis on infected wheat leaves infected, at 16 dpi, with Z. tritici strains carrying green-fluorescent proteins in their sdi1 locus. One-way ANOVA testing indicates no difference between wild-type IPO323 (Control) and strains expressing A. coerulescens GFP (AcGFP), enhanced GFP (eGFP) and codon-optimized GFP for usage in Z. tritici (ZtGFP; error probability P = 0.7991; for more information on the strains and ZtGFP see Kilaru et al., 2015b). Mean ± SEM is shown, sample size n is indicated. (B) Bar chart showing the degree of necrosis on infected wheat leaves infected, at 16 dpi, with Z. tritici strains carrying red-fluorescent proteins in their sdi1 locus. One-way ANOVA testing indicates no difference between wild-type IPO323 (Control) and strains expressing the red-fluorescent Discosoma-derived proteins monomeric RFP (mRFP), mCherry and tdTomato, as well as TagRFP from the sea anemone E. quadricolor (error probability P = 0.9957; for more information on the strains see Schuster et al., 2015a), Mean ± SEM is shown, sample size n is indicated. (C) Bar chart showing average pycnidia count per μm2 of infected leave area at 21 dpi. One-way ANOVA testing indicates no difference between wild-type IPO323 (Control) and strains expressing various GFPs (GFP from A. coerulescens: AcGFP, enhanced GFP from A. victoria: eGFP, enhanced GFP from A. victoria, codon-optimized for usage in Z. tritici: ZtGFP; error probability P = 0.7936). Mean ± SEM is shown, sample size n is indicated. (D) Bar chart showing average pycnidia count per μm2 of infected leave area at 21 dpi. One-way ANOVA testing indicates no difference between wild-type IPO323 (Control) and strains expressing various RFPs (monomeric red fluorescent protein, including TagRFP, generated from the wild-type RFP from sea anemone E. quadricolor), and various derivatives of the red fluorescent protein from Discosoma corals (mRFP, tdTomato and mCherry; error probability P = 0.9954). Mean ± SEM is shown, sample size n is indicated. (E) Wheat leaves at 21 days after infection with Z. tritici strains carrying various green fluorescent proteins in their sdi1 locus. Brown dots represent fungal pycnidia. No obvious difference was found between wild-type IPO323 (Control) and strains expressing various GFPs (GFP from A. coerulescens: AcGFP, enhanced GFP from A. victoria: eGFP, enhanced GFP from A. victoria, codon-optimized for usage in Z. tritici: ZtGFP). More detail on the AcGFP and ZtGFP expressing strains can be found in Kilaru et al. (2015b). (F) Wheat leaves at 21 days after infection with Z. tritici strains carrying various red fluorescent proteins in their sdi1 locus. Brown dots represent fungal pycnidia. No obvious difference was found between wild-type IPO323 (Control) and strains expressing various RFPs (monomeric red fluorescent protein, including TagRFP, generated from the wild-type RFP from sea anemone E. quadricolor), and various derivatives of the red fluorescent protein from Discosoma corals (mRFP, tdTomato and mCherry; for more detail on RFP-expressing strains see Schuster, et al., 2015a).