Literature DB >> 26092577

Use of Remote Monitoring Is Associated With Lower Risk of Adverse Outcomes Among Patients With Implanted Cardiac Defibrillators.

Joseph G Akar1, Haikun Bao1, Paul W Jones1, Yongfei Wang1, Paul D Varosy1, Frederick A Masoudi1, Kenneth M Stein1, Leslie A Saxon1, Sharon-Lise T Normand1, Jeptha P Curtis2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined the association between the use of remote patient monitoring (RPM) of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and all-cause mortality and rehospitalization among patients undergoing initial ICD implant. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A limited data set was constructed from Boston Scientific ALTITUDE Registry and National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry between January 2006 and March 2010. Vital status was determined using the Social Security Death Master File. All-cause mortality up to 3 years was compared in patients who used RPM with those who did not use RPM. Time-dependent frailty Cox models quantified the association between RPM use and all-cause mortality. Analyses were repeated in subgroups based on age, sex, race, ICD type, indication, and cardiomyopathy pathogenesis. Similar methodology examined the association between RPM use and all-cause rehospitalization in patients enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service patients ≥65 years. The study cohort (n=37,742, age 67±13, 72% male) had a 3-year mortality of 20.9% (median follow-up 832 days). In multivariable analyses, patients using RPM (n=22,023, 58%) had lower risk of mortality compared with those not using RPM (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.71, P<0.0001). The 3-year all-cause rehospitalization rate in the Medicare population (n=15,254) was 69.3% (median follow-up 922 days). Risk of rehospitalization of patients using RPM (n=9150, 60%) was lower than those not using RPM (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.80-0.84, P<0.0001). Findings were consistent across subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing initial ICD implant, RPM use is associated with significantly lower risk of adverse outcomes.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiomyopathy; defibrillation; fee-for-service plans; registry; sudden death

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26092577     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.003030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  16 in total

Review 1.  The Future of Arrhythmias and Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Christine M Albert; William G Stevenson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Treatment of heart failure in adult congenital heart disease: a position paper of the Working Group of Grown-Up Congenital Heart Disease and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Werner Budts; Jolien Roos-Hesselink; Tanja Rädle-Hurst; Andreas Eicken; Theresa A McDonagh; Ekaterini Lambrinou; Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Fiona Walker; Alexandra A Frogoudaki
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Recommendations on the utilization of telemedicine in cardiology.

Authors:  Michael Gruska; Gerhard Aigner; Johann Altenberger; Dagmar Burkart-Küttner; Lukas Fiedler; Marianne Gwechenberger; Peter Lercher; Martin Martinek; Michael Nürnberg; Gerhard Pölzl; Gerold Porenta; Stefan Sauermann; Christoph Schukro; Daniel Scherr; Clemens Steinwender; Markus Stühlinger; Alexander Teubl
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Does remote patient monitoring reduce acute care use? A systematic review.

Authors:  Monica L Taylor; Emma E Thomas; Centaine L Snoswell; Anthony C Smith; Liam J Caffery
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Home delivery of the communicator for remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices: A multicenter experience during the covid-19 lockdown.

Authors:  Michele Magnocavallo; Alessia Bernardini; Marco Valerio Mariani; Agostino Piro; Massimiliano Marini; Antonino Nicosia; Carmen Adduci; Antonio Rapacciuolo; Davide Saporito; Stefano Grossi; Giuseppe Santarpia; Paola Vaccaro; Roberto Rordorf; Francesco Pentimalli; Giuseppe Giunta; Monica Campari; Sergio Valsecchi; Carlo Lavalle
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Improved survival in patients enrolled promptly into remote monitoring following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation.

Authors:  Suneet Mittal; Jonathan P Piccini; Jeff Snell; Julie B Prillinger; Nirav Dalal; Niraj Varma
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Telemedicine in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Nicolino Ambrosino; Guido Vagheggini; Stefano Mazzoleni; Michele Vitacca
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2016-12

8.  INvestigation on Routine Follow-up in CONgestive HearT FAilure Patients with Remotely Monitored Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators SysTems (InContact).

Authors:  Claudius Hansen; Christian Loges; Karlheinz Seidl; Frank Eberhardt; Herbert Tröster; Krum Petrov; Gerian Grönefeld; Peter Bramlage; Frank Birkenhauer; Christian Weiss
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and resynchronization devices to improve patient outcomes: dead end or way ahead?

Authors:  Frieder Braunschweig; Stefan D Anker; Jochen Proff; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Outcomes and costs of remote patient monitoring among patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators: An economic model based on the PREDICT RM database.

Authors:  James P Hummel; Robert J Leipold; Stacey L Amorosi; Haikun Bao; Kristen A Deger; Paul W Jones; Anuraag R Kansal; Lesli S Ott; Sean Stern; Kenneth Stein; Jeptha P Curtis; Joseph G Akar
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.