Literature DB >> 26092131

Evolution of psychology and counseling in infertility.

Jacky Boivin1, Sofia Gameiro2.   

Abstract

Five key paradigm shifts are described to illustrate the evolution of psychology and counseling in infertility. The first paradigm shift was in the 1930s when psychosomatic concepts were introduced in obstetrics and gynecology as causal factors to explain why some couples could not conceive despite the absence of organic pathology. In the second shift, the nurse advocacy movement of the 1970s stimulated the investigation of the psychosocial consequences of infertility and promoted counseling to help couples grieve childlessness when medical treatments often could not help them conceive. The third shift occurred with the advent of IVF, which created a demand for mental health professionals in fertility clinics. Mental health professionals assessed the ability of couples to withstand the demands of this new high technology treatment as well as their suitability as potential parents. The fourth shift, in the 1990s, saw reproductive medicine embrace the principles of evidence-based medicine, which introduced a much more rigorous approach to medical practice (effectiveness and safety) that extended to psychosocial interventions. The most recent paradigm shift, in the new millennium, occurred with the realization that compliance with protracted fertility treatment depended on the adoption of an integrated approach to fertility care. An integrated approach could reduce treatment burden arising from multiple sources (i.e., patient, clinic, and treatment). This review describes these paradigm shifts and reflects on future clinical and research directions for mental health professionals.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Psychology; assisted reproductive techniques; counseling; history

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26092131     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

1.  Quality of life among female childhood cancer survivors with and without premature ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Hjelmér Ida; Gustafsson Kylberg Alicia; Fridenborg Anna; Leijonhufvud Irene; Nyström Anna; Mörse Helena; Elfving Maria; Henic Emir; Nenonen Hannah
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 2.  Global Research Trends on Infertility and Psychology From the Past Two Decades: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study.

Authors:  Hongkun Zhu; Lingli Shi; Rong Wang; Lijuan Cui; Jiahui Wang; Mengyu Tang; Haiqing Qian; Minggang Wei; Lihong Wang; Huifang Zhou; Wenting Xu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 6.055

3.  The Risk of Psychiatric Morbidity and Course of Distress in Males Undergoing Infertility Evaluation Is Affected by Their Factor of Infertility.

Authors:  Katarzyna Warchol-Biedermann
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb

4.  The relationship of the psychological coping and adjustment strategies of infertile women with the success of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Nahid Golmakani; Samira Ebrahimzadeh Zagami; Habibollah Esmaily; Atiyeh Vatanchi; Maryam Kabirian
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2019-03-19

5.  The effectiveness of a collaborative infertility counseling (CIC) on pregnancy outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Mahboobeh Rasoulzadeh Bidgoli; Robab Latifnejad Roudsari; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sofia Burgio; Concetta Polizzi; Giovanni Buzzaccarini; Antonio Simone Laganà; Giuseppe Gullo; Giovanna Perricone; Antonino Perino; Gaspare Cucinella; Marianna Alesi
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2022-03-09

7.  Improving IUI success by performing modified slow-release insemination and a patient-centred approach in an insemination programme with partner semen: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  W Ombelet; I Van der Auwera; H Bijnens; J Onofre; C Kremer; L Bruckers; G Mestdagh; R Campo; N Dhont
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-12

Review 8.  Enhancing interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education in women's health.

Authors:  Laura Baecher-Lind; Angela C Fleming; Rashmi Bhargava; Susan M Cox; Elise N Everett; David A Forstein; Shireen Madani Sims; Helen K Morgan; Christopher M Morosky; Celeste S Royce; Tammy S Sonn; Jill M Sutton; Scott C Graziano
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2022-12

9.  Effects of immediate versus delayed frozen embryo transfer in high responder patients undergoing freeze-all cycles.

Authors:  Na Zuo; Yingzhuo Gao; Ningning Zhang; Da Li; Xiuxia Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Fertility Adjustment Scale.

Authors:  Joana Romeiro; Paulo Nogueira; Sílvia Caldeira
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.