Literature DB >> 26092049

Integrating Agricultural and Ecological Goals into the Management of Species-Rich Grasslands: Learning from the Flowering Meadows Competition in France.

Danièle Magda1, Christine de Sainte Marie2, Sylvain Plantureux3,4, Cyril Agreil5, Bernard Amiaud4,6,7, Philippe Mestelan5, Sarah Mihout5.   

Abstract

Current agri-environmental schemes for reconciling agricultural production with biodiversity conservation are proving ineffective Europe-wide, increasing interest in results-based schemes (RBSs). We describe here the French "Flowering Meadows" competition, rewarding the "best agroecological balance" in semi-natural grasslands managed by livestock farmers. This competition, which was entered by about a thousand farmers in 50 regional nature parks between 2007 and 2014, explicitly promotes a new style of agri-environmental scheme focusing on an ability to reach the desired outcome rather than adherence to prescriptive management rules. Building on our experience in the design and monitoring of the competition, we argue that the cornerstone of successful RBSs is a collective learning process in which the reconciliation of agriculture and environment is reconsidered in terms of synergistic relationships between agricultural and ecological functioning. We present the interactive, iterative process by which we defined an original method for assessing species-rich grasslands in agroecological terms. This approach was based on the integration of new criteria, such as flexibility, feeding value, and consistency of use, into the assessment of forage production performance and the consideration of biodiversity conservation through its functional role within the grassland ecosystem, rather than simply noting the presence or abundance of species. We describe the adaptation of this methodology on the basis of competition feedback, to bring about a significant shift in the conventional working methods of agronomists and conservationists (including researchers).The potential and efficacy of RBSs for promoting ecologically sound livestock systems are discussed in the concluding remarks, and they relate to the ecological intensification debate.

Keywords:  Agroecological value; Collective learning; Livestock production; Result-based schemes; Species-rich grasslands

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26092049     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0553-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  5 in total

1.  Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties.

Authors:  P A Matson; W J Parton; A G Power; M J Swift
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.

Authors:  D Kleijn; R A Baquero; Y Clough; M Díaz; J De Esteban; F Fernández; D Gabriel; F Herzog; A Holzschuh; R Jöhl; E Knop; A Kruess; E J P Marshall; I Steffan-Dewenter; T Tscharntke; J Verhulst; T M West; J L Yela
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  France lays plans for green future.

Authors:  Declan Butler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture.

Authors:  K G Cassman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Action versus result-oriented schemes in a grassland agroecosystem: a dynamic modelling approach.

Authors:  Rodolphe Sabatier; Luc Doyen; Muriel Tichit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Reconciling Environment and Production in Managed Ecosystems: Is Ecological Intensification a Solution?

Authors:  Thomas Cordonnier; Jean-Luc Peyron
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination.

Authors:  Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki; Anahí Espíndola; Adam J Vanbergen; Josef Settele; Claire Kremen; Lynn V Dicks
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 9.492

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.