INTRODUCTION: Drugs inhibiting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) are approved in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but resistance inevitably emerges. Proposed escape pathways include increased phosphorylation of Akt, which can be down regulated by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. We hypothesized that co-treatment with the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus and the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat may abrogate resistance in RCC. METHODS: This phase 1 study evaluated the co-administration of ridaforolimus and vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in RCC patients. Although all solid tumors were allowed, prior cytotoxic chemotherapy was limited to 1 regimen. Using a modified 3 + 3 dose escalation design, various dose combinations were tested concurrently in separate cohorts. Efficacy was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were treated at one of three dose levels, thirteen with RCC (10 clear cell, 3 papillary). Dosing was limited by thrombocytopenia. The MTD was determined to be ridaforolimus 20 mg daily days 1-5 with vorinostat 100 mg BID days 1-3 weekly, however late onset thrombocytopenia led to a lower recommended phase II dose: ridaforolimus 20 mg daily days 1-5 with vorinostat 100 mg daily days 1-3 weekly. Two patients, both with papillary RCC, maintained disease control for 54 and 80 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ridaforolimus and vorinostat was tolerable at the recommended phase II dose. Two patients with papillary RCC experienced prolonged disease stabilization, thus further study of combined HDAC and mTOR inhibition in this population is warranted.
INTRODUCTION: Drugs inhibiting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) are approved in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but resistance inevitably emerges. Proposed escape pathways include increased phosphorylation of Akt, which can be down regulated by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. We hypothesized that co-treatment with the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus and the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat may abrogate resistance in RCC. METHODS: This phase 1 study evaluated the co-administration of ridaforolimus and vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in RCCpatients. Although all solid tumors were allowed, prior cytotoxic chemotherapy was limited to 1 regimen. Using a modified 3 + 3 dose escalation design, various dose combinations were tested concurrently in separate cohorts. Efficacy was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were treated at one of three dose levels, thirteen with RCC (10 clear cell, 3 papillary). Dosing was limited by thrombocytopenia. The MTD was determined to be ridaforolimus 20 mg daily days 1-5 with vorinostat 100 mg BID days 1-3 weekly, however late onset thrombocytopenia led to a lower recommended phase II dose: ridaforolimus 20 mg daily days 1-5 with vorinostat 100 mg daily days 1-3 weekly. Two patients, both with papillary RCC, maintained disease control for 54 and 80 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ridaforolimus and vorinostat was tolerable at the recommended phase II dose. Two patients with papillary RCC experienced prolonged disease stabilization, thus further study of combined HDAC and mTOR inhibition in this population is warranted.
Authors: Raju R Raval; Kah Weng Lau; Maxine G B Tran; Heidi M Sowter; Stefano J Mandriota; Ji-Liang Li; Christopher W Pugh; Patrick H Maxwell; Adrian L Harris; Peter J Ratcliffe Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: George V Thomas; Chris Tran; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Derek S Welsbie; Emily Chan; Barbara Fueger; Johannes Czernin; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Nat Med Date: 2005-12-11 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: William Kevin Kelly; Owen A O'Connor; Lee M Krug; Judy H Chiao; Mark Heaney; Tracy Curley; Barbara MacGregore-Cortelli; William Tong; J Paul Secrist; Lawrence Schwartz; Stacy Richardson; Elaina Chu; Semra Olgac; Paul A Marks; Howard Scher; Victoria M Richon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-05-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gary Hudes; Michael Carducci; Piotr Tomczak; Janice Dutcher; Robert Figlin; Anil Kapoor; Elzbieta Staroslawska; Jeffrey Sosman; David McDermott; István Bodrogi; Zoran Kovacevic; Vladimir Lesovoy; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Olga Barbarash; Erhan Gokmen; Timothy O'Toole; Stephanie Lustgarten; Laurence Moore; Robert J Motzer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kathryn E O'Reilly; Fredi Rojo; Qing-Bai She; David Solit; Gordon B Mills; Debra Smith; Heidi Lane; Francesco Hofmann; Daniel J Hicklin; Dale L Ludwig; Jose Baselga; Neal Rosen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Javier C Angulo; Claudia Manini; Jose I López; Angel Pueyo; Begoña Colás; Santiago Ropero Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-04-25 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Eva Juengel; Ramin Najafi; Jochen Rutz; Sebastian Maxeiner; Jasmina Makarevic; Frederik Roos; Igor Tsaur; Axel Haferkamp; Roman A Blaheta Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-11-06
Authors: Philip Earwaker; Caroline Anderson; Frances Willenbrock; Adrian L Harris; Andrew S Protheroe; Valentine M Macaulay Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jasmina Makarević; Jochen Rutz; Eva Juengel; Sebastian Maxeiner; Jens Mani; Stefan Vallo; Igor Tsaur; Frederik Roos; Felix K-H Chun; Roman A Blaheta Journal: Cells Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 6.600