BACKGROUND: Hypoxic and necrotic regions that accrue within solid tumors in vivo are known to be associated with metastasis formation, radio- and chemotherapy resistance, and drug metabolism. Therefore, integration of these tumor characteristics into in vitro drug screening models is advantageous for any reliable investigation of the anticancer activity of novel drug candidates. In general, usage of cell culture models with in vivo like characteristics has become essential in preclinical drug studies and allows evaluation of complex problems such as tumor selectivity and anti-invasive properties of the drug candidates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we investigated the anticancer activity of clinically approved, investigational and experimental drugs based on platinum (cisplatin, oxaliplatin and KP1537), gallium (KP46), ruthenium (KP1339) and lanthanum (KP772) in different cell culture models such as monolayers, multicellular spheroids, as well as invasion and metastasis models. Results Application of the Alamar Blue assay to multicellular spheroids and a spheroid-based invasion assay resulted in an altered rating of compounds with regard to their cytotoxicity and ability to inhibit invasion when compared with monolayer-based cytotoxicity and transwell assays. For example, the gallium-based drug candidate KP46 showed in spheroid cultures significantly enhanced properties to inhibit protrusion formation and fibroblast mediated invasiveness, and improved cancer cell selectivity. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our results demonstrate the advantages of spheroid-based assays and underline the necessity of using different experimental models for reliable preclinical investigations assessing and better predicting the anticancer potential of new compounds.
BACKGROUND: Hypoxic and necrotic regions that accrue within solid tumors in vivo are known to be associated with metastasis formation, radio- and chemotherapy resistance, and drug metabolism. Therefore, integration of these tumor characteristics into in vitro drug screening models is advantageous for any reliable investigation of the anticancer activity of novel drug candidates. In general, usage of cell culture models with in vivo like characteristics has become essential in preclinical drug studies and allows evaluation of complex problems such as tumor selectivity and anti-invasive properties of the drug candidates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we investigated the anticancer activity of clinically approved, investigational and experimental drugs based on platinum (cisplatin, oxaliplatin and KP1537), gallium (KP46), ruthenium (KP1339) and lanthanum (KP772) in different cell culture models such as monolayers, multicellular spheroids, as well as invasion and metastasis models. Results Application of the Alamar Blue assay to multicellular spheroids and a spheroid-based invasion assay resulted in an altered rating of compounds with regard to their cytotoxicity and ability to inhibit invasion when compared with monolayer-based cytotoxicity and transwell assays. For example, the gallium-based drug candidate KP46 showed in spheroid cultures significantly enhanced properties to inhibit protrusion formation and fibroblast mediated invasiveness, and improved cancer cell selectivity. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our results demonstrate the advantages of spheroid-based assays and underline the necessity of using different experimental models for reliable preclinical investigations assessing and better predicting the anticancer potential of new compounds.
Authors: Christopher Korch; Monique A Spillman; Twila A Jackson; Britta M Jacobsen; Susan K Murphy; Bruce A Lessey; V Craig Jordan; Andrew P Bradford Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-06-16 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Seied Mojtaba Valiahdi; Petra Heffeter; Michael A Jakupec; Rodrig Marculescu; Walter Berger; Klemens Rappersberger; Bernhard K Keppler Journal: Melanoma Res Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Sergey A Abramkin; Ute Jungwirth; Seied M Valiahdi; Claudia Dworak; Ladislav Habala; Kristof Meelich; Walter Berger; Michael A Jakupec; Christian G Hartinger; Alexey A Nazarov; Mathea Sophia Galanski; Bernhard K Keppler Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Maria Vinci; Sharon Gowan; Frances Boxall; Lisa Patterson; Miriam Zimmermann; William Court; Cara Lomas; Marta Mendiola; David Hardisson; Suzanne A Eccles Journal: BMC Biol Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 7.431
Authors: Ignacio E León; Juan F Cadavid-Vargas; Agustina Resasco; Fabricio Maschi; Miguel A Ayala; Cecilia Carbone; Susana B Etcheverry Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Simone Göschl; Ekaterina Schreiber-Brynzak; Verena Pichler; Klaudia Cseh; Petra Heffeter; Ute Jungwirth; Michael A Jakupec; Walter Berger; Bernhard K Keppler Journal: Metallomics Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 4.526
Authors: Marie Millard; Ilya Yakavets; Vladimir Zorin; Aigul Kulmukhamedova; Sophie Marchal; Lina Bezdetnaya Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2017-10-31
Authors: Ekaterina Schreiber-Brynzak; Verena Pichler; Petra Heffeter; Buck Hanson; Sarah Theiner; Irene Lichtscheidl-Schultz; Christoph Kornauth; Luca Bamonti; Vineet Dhery; Diana Groza; David Berry; Walter Berger; Markus Galanski; Michael A Jakupec; Bernhard K Keppler Journal: Metallomics Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 4.526
Authors: Elizabeth J Anthony; Elizabeth M Bolitho; Hannah E Bridgewater; Oliver W L Carter; Jane M Donnelly; Cinzia Imberti; Edward C Lant; Frederik Lermyte; Russell J Needham; Marta Palau; Peter J Sadler; Huayun Shi; Fang-Xin Wang; Wen-Ying Zhang; Zijin Zhang Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Natasja Franceschini; Jan Oosting; Maud Tamsma; Bertine Niessen; Inge Briaire-de Bruijn; Brendy van den Akker; Alwine B Kruisselbrink; Ieva Palubeckaitė; Judith V M G Bovée; Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 5.923