Literature DB >> 26091028

Healing the NIH-Funded Biomedical Research Enterprise.

Ronald N Germain1.   

Abstract

Many feel that the R01 grant system supporting biomedical research in the U.S. is broken, discouraging entry of young investigators into the system and inadequately supporting more established investigators. Here, I argue for a "person-not-project"-based scheme that would permit creative, unfettered research by new investigators, better tie ongoing research contributions to continued funding, and help match the number of investigators seeking support with available funds.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26091028      PMCID: PMC4495897          DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  6 in total

1.  Reforming science: methodological and cultural reforms.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  A generation at risk: young investigators and the future of the biomedical workforce.

Authors:  Ronald J Daniels
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Opinion: Addressing systemic problems in the biomedical research enterprise.

Authors:  Bruce Alberts; Marc W Kirschner; Shirley Tilghman; Harold Varmus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Funding. NIH institute considers broad shift to 'people' awards.

Authors:  Jocelyn Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws.

Authors:  Bruce Alberts; Marc W Kirschner; Shirley Tilghman; Harold Varmus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Maximizing the return on taxpayers' investments in fundamental biomedical research.

Authors:  Jon R Lorsch
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.138

  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  Epidemiology at a time for unity.

Authors:  Bryan Lau; Priya Duggal; Stephan Ehrhardt
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  The Last 50 Years: Mismeasurement and Mismanagement Are Impeding Scientific Research.

Authors:  Peter A Lawrence
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity.

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; Anthony Bowen; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  What's Fair Is Fair: Leveling the Playing Field for Young Scientists.

Authors:  Jonathan W Yewdell
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-31

5.  Supporting novel biomedical research via multilayer collaboration networks.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Lu; Partha Sarathi Mukherjee; Juntao Zhuang; Konstantin Kuzmin; Chris Gaiteri; Boleslaw K Szymanski
Journal:  Appl Netw Sci       Date:  2016-11-17

6.  How to get and keep your lab funded.

Authors:  Jonathan Chernoff
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Why can't we make research grant allocation systems more consistent? A personal opinion.

Authors:  Roger Cousens
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers?

Authors:  Krist Vaesen; Joel Katzav
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Patricia A Haggerty; Matthew J Fenton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.