Literature DB >> 26090888

Screening Mutations of MYBPC3 in 114 Unrelated Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy by Targeted Capture and Next-generation Sequencing.

Xuxia Liu1, Tengyong Jiang2, Chunmei Piao1, Xiaoyan Li1, Jun Guo1, Shuai Zheng1, Xiaoping Zhang1, Tao Cai2, Jie Du1.   

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a major cause of sudden cardiac death. Mutations in the MYBPC3 gene represent the cause of HCM in ~35% of patients with HCM. However, genetic testing in clinic setting has been limited due to the cost and relatively time-consuming by Sanger sequencing. Here, we developed a HCM Molecular Diagnostic Kit enabling ultra-low-cost targeted gene resequencing in a large cohort and investigated the mutation spectrum of MYBPC3. In a cohort of 114 patients with HCM, a total of 20 different mutations (8 novel and 12 known mutations) of MYBPC3 were identified from 25 patients (21.9%). We demonstrated that the power of targeted resequencing in a cohort of HCM patients, and found that MYBPC3 is a common HCM-causing gene in Chinese patients. Phenotype-genotype analyses showed that the patients with double mutations (n = 2) or premature termination codon mutations (n = 12) showed more severe manifestations, compared with patients with missense mutations (n = 11). Particularly, we identified a recurrent truncation mutation (p.Y842X) in four unrelated cases (4/25, 16%), who showed severe phenotypes, and suggest that the p.Y842X is a frequent mutation in Chinese HCM patients with severe phenotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26090888      PMCID: PMC4473690          DOI: 10.1038/srep11411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM, MIM# 192600) is defined by an increased left ventricular wall thickness in the absence of other loading conditions1. HCM is a common inherited cardiac disorder with an estimated prevalence of 1:500 and often follows an autosomal-dominant inheritance pattern with incomplete penetrance123. The clinical course of HCM varies considerably, from asymptomatic over limited symptoms to severe heart failure and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Also, HCM is the most common cause of SCD in young and competitive athletes145. Therefore, early diagnosis is crucial for prevention of such catastrophic events. Over 1,400 mutations in at least 11 genes encoding sarcomere proteins have been reported to cause HCM6. Among them, mutations in the MYBPC3 gene encoding the myosin binding protein C represent one of the most common genetic causes of HCM789. It was estimated that ~35% of all cases of HCM are due to MYBPC3 mutations in Western countries46. Genetic testing is routinely recommended in patients with HCM according to current clinical guidelines37, but its use at clinic has been limited by the cost and time-consuming conventional sequencing technologies. In this study, we developed targeted exome capture for rapid sequencing and detection of MYBPC3 mutations. This technology can analyze large genomic regions at lower cost and faster time than conventional Sanger sequencing. It is also regarded as the most advantageous technology in finding almost all types of mutations including small indel mutations101112. Here we report the mutation spectrum of MYBPC3 in a large cohort of unrelated Chinese patients with HCM using this approach, and explore the clinical characteristics and their correlation with different MYBPC3 genotypes.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

A total of 114 unrelated patients with HCM were recruited from 2012 to 2013. Detailed demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. Particularly, 29 patients (25.4%) had familial history of HCM, and 12 patients (10.5%) had a family history of unexplained SCD. None of these patients had history of genetic counseling or gene diagnosis.
Table 1

Clinical findings of 114 patients with HCM.

ExaminationsResults
Age at diagnosis or screening (years)42.9 ± 15.5
Male/Female72/42
Family history of HCM (%) 
HCM (%)25.4%
SCD (%)10.5%
Echocardiography 
Maximal LVWT (mm)20.8 ± 5.0
Left atrial diameter (mm)40.6 ± 8.6
LVEDD (mm)43.7 ± 6.1
LVESD (mm)27.0 ± 6.2
LVEF(67.5 ± 9.2)%
Patients with LVOTO (%)57.9%

Data are presented as the number (%) of subjects or mean value ± SD. HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; SCD, sudden cardiac death; LVWT, left ventricular wall thickness; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVOTO, left ventricular outflow track obstruction.

Sequence analysis

Overall, the mean read depth for the exome sequence of MYBPC3 was >300×. For each subject, more than 78% of the targeted bases were sequenced at least 20 times. The filtering process of targeted capture and sequencing data from 114 HCM patients were shown in Fig. 1. A total of 145 potential mutations (e.g., nonsynonymous, nonsense, and splice-site mutations) and 7 InDels were identified in the 114 patients. By filtering multiple databases (dbSNP137, HapMap, 1000 Genome, ESP6500, and 300 Chinese Han exome in-house database), we identified 8 novel mutations (2 missense, 1 nonsense, and 5 InDel-induced frameshift mutations) as well as 12 known causative mutations (as shown in the HGMD database). All of these 20 mutations were predicted to be probably pathogenic by SIFT and Polyphen-2, and further confirmed by Sanger sequencing analyses (the forward sequencing data are shown in Fig. 2b; the reverse sequencing results are included in Supplementary Fig. S2 online).
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the filtering process of targeted capture and sequencing data from 114 HCM patients.

After known SNVs/InDels were screened, a total of 145 SNVs/ 7 InDels are identified for pathogenic and functional analysis. A total of 20 mutations have been confirmed for phenotype-genotype analysis. SNV, single nucleotide variant; OMIM, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man; HGMD, human gene mutation database.

Figure 2

Location and Sanger sequencing of selected mutations in MYBPC3.

(a) MYBPC3 encodes seven immunoglobulin (IG) domains, three fibronectin type 3 (FN3) domains, and an immunoglobulin C-2 (IGc2) domain. Mutations shown in green indicate seven novel nonsense and frame shift mutations identified in this study. Two novel missense mutations are denoted in blue. The recurrent p.Y842X mutation is presented in red. (b) Sanger sequencing has confirmed all 8 novel mutations (2 missense, 1 nonsense and 5 frame shifts) and the p.Y842X mutation. All other 12 known pathogenic mutations also have been confirmed (figure not shown).

MYBPC3 genotype analysis

Mutations in the 25 patients (6 with familiar history, 19 sporadic cases) were identified with 20 different mutations in MYBPC3 (Table 2), including 3 nonsense, 6 InDels, and 11 missense mutations. Here we show the 8 novel mutations and one recurrent mutation on the schematic protein structure (Fig. 2a) and the confirmation of the mutations by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 2b). Four mutations (i.e., p.G37X, p.I49S, p.I603V and p.A741fs) were located in the immunoglobulin (Ig) domains, two mutations (p.P1208fs and p.P1245fs) located in the Ig C2 domain, and only one mutation (p.Y842X) located in the FN3 domain. All of the amino acid residues that are mutated are highly conserved across multiple species from zebrafish to human (Supplementary Fig. S1).
Table 2

Summary of detected mutations in MYBPC3by deeper sequencing.

PatientExonDNA SeqAmino acidMutation typeDomainReference
R02482c.G109Tp.G37XnonsenseIG-1novel
R05794c.C416Ap.S139Xnonsensebetween IG-1 & 2Kassem (2013)21
R051312c.989delCp.P330fsframeshiftmotifnovel
R023515c.1377delCp.P459fsframeshiftIG-4Lin (2010)22; Zou (2013)23
R022622c.2222_2223insGp.A741fsframeshiftIG-6novel
R0104, R0105, R0126, R025724c.C2526Gp.Y842XnonsenseFN3-1Andersen (2004)14
R016526c.2864_2865delCTp.P955fsframeshiftmotifnovel
R0519, R058031c.3624delCp.P1208fsframeshiftIGc2novel
R058532c.3735delCp.P1245fsframeshiftIGc2novel
R00882c.T146Gp.I49SmissenseIG-1novel
R02484c.C478Tp.R160WmissensemotifAnan (2007)16
R059812c.G1000Ap.E334KmissensemotifAnan (2007)16
R016814c.G1321Ap.E441KmissenseIG-3Olivotto (2008)24
R009416c.C1504Gp.R502GmissenseIG-4Richard (2003)25
R010316c.G1505Ap.R502QmissenseIG-4Niimura (1998)18
R0166, R0123, R0227, R051716c.G1519Ap.G507RmissenseIG-4Erdmann (2003)15
R016418c.A1807Gp.I603VmissenseIG-5novel
R008422c.G2308Ap.D770NmissensemotifVan Driest (2004)26
R016424c.G2429Ap.R810HmissenseFN3-1Nanni (2003)27
R016927c.C2992Gp.Q998EmissenseIG-7Van Driest (2004)26

A list of 2 missense, 1 nonsense and 5 indel-induced frameshift variants were not present in dbSNP135, HapMap, 1000 Genome Project, ESP6500, and in-house normal Chinese exome database. Harmful alleles were predicted by both SIFT and PPH2 programs. Amino acid alterations due to splice site mutations have not been determined.

HCM phenotype associated with MYBPC3 genotype

Clinical characteristics and corresponding MYBPC3 mutations of the 25 HCM patients were summarized (Table 3). In the 25 patients, 10 (40%) showed symptoms before 35 years old. Syncope was present in 7 (28%) patients. Six (24%) patients had familial HCM or SCD history. Over half of the patients (64%) developed left ventricular outflow track obstruction (LVOTO).
Table 3

Analyses of HCM phenotype and MYBPC3 genotype.

PatientMutationSexAge at onset (years)DurationSyncopeNYHA classFHCM or FSCDLVWT max (mm)SiteLA (mm)LVEDD (mm)LVEF (%)LVOTOInvasive therapyECG
Frameshift and/or nonsense
R0513p.P330fs*M2020 4FSCD28.4S314073YSMVT, LVH, ST-T abn.
R0235p.P459fsM613 1 32S424763Y LVH, ST-T abn.
R0226p.A741fs*M215 2 24S464069Y LVH, ST-T abn.
R0165p.P955fs*F471 1 16S284160Y VT
R0519p.P1208fs*M515 1 16.5S414470  ST-T abn.
R0580p.P1208fs*FUKUK UK 15.8S394569 UKUK
R0585p.P1245fs*M251Y1FHCM FSCD14S385265  PVC, ST-T abn.
R0579p.S139XM4516 4 28.5A5041.578YICDST-T abn., LVH
R0104p.Y842XM4710Y4 28A444475YASAST-T abn., LVH, LAH
R0105p.Y842XM4711Y4 27S354061YASA, PM1-AV block
R0126p.Y842XM4034 4FHCM19S465745 PMAF
R0257p.Y842XF2437Y4FHCM13.9S465169  UK
Mean ± SD  38.9 ± 14.013.0 ± 12.7   21.9 ± 6.7 40.5 ± 6.645.2 ± 5.566.4 ± 8.7   
Double mutations               
R0248p.G37X*; p.R160WM2510 3 26S434180 SMRBBB, LVH, QTP, ST-T abn.
R0164p.I603V*; p.R810HM2020 4 28S424782Y LVH, ST-T abn.
Mean ± SD  22.5 ± 3.515 ± 7.1   27 ± 1.4 42.5 ± 0.744 ± 4.281 ± 1.4   
Missense               
R0088p.I49S*F3910 4 18S454575  MI
R0598p.E334KF3710 2FHCM20S434765Y LVH, ST-T abn.
R0168p.E441KM4515Y3FHCM26S39ND61Y IVCB, MI, LVH, ST-T abn.
R0094p.R502GF2914 3 21S323866Y QTP
R0103p.R502QM384 4 16.4S324359  RBBB, LVH, ST-T abn.
R0123p.G507RF522 2 18S314754Y LAH
R0166p.G507RM3026Y1 20S465255Y AF, LVH, ST-T abn.
R0227p.G507RF241 1 24.5S373865Y UK
R0517p.G507RM431 2 21S364469  WPW
R0084p.D770NM481Y1 17S434078Y ST-T abn.
R0169p.Q998EM291 1 13.5S364567Y LVH, ST-T abn.
Mean ± SD  37.6 ± 8.97.7 ± 8.1   19.6 ± 3.6 38.2 ± 5.443.9 ± 4.464.9 ± 7.5   

*novel mutation found in this study. Blank: negative result. Y, yes; UK, unknown; S, septum; A, apex; FHCM, family history of HCM; FSCD, family history of sudden cardiac death; max, maximum; LA, left atrial internal diameter; SM, septum myectomy; RBBB, Right Bundle Branch Block; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; QTP, QT duration prolongation; abn. abnormalities; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; VT, ventricular tachycardia; LAH, left atrial hypertrophy; ASA, alcohol septal ablation; MI, myocardial infarction; PM, pacemaker; 1-AV, first-degree atrioventricular; AF, atrial fibrillation; IVCB, intraventricular conduction block; LVOTD, left ventricular outflow track dredging; WPW, Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome. ND, not determined. The other abbreviations were seen in the Table 1.

We further analyzed the correlation of the phenotype-genotype in the patients. Among the 12 patients carrying premature stop codon (PTC) mutations, two patients (R0513 and R0585) carrying novel frame shift mutations (p.P330fs and p.P1245fs) had familial SCD history, severe ventricular arrhythmias or history of receiving septum myectomy due to severe hypertrophy (Table 3). Of note, the p.Y842X, producing a PTC in exon 24, was identified in four unrelated patients showing severe manifestations of hypertrophy requiring surgery or symptomatic arrhythmia. In addition, one patient with the p.S139X mutation was hospitalized for receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Two patients with severe manifestations of the disease were detected carrying double mutations (p.G37X and p.R160W; p.I603V and p.R810H). Notably, the p.G37X mutation is the closest premature stop mutation to the starting codon identified thus far, which is predicted to produce a full-truncated protein. And yet, its combination with p.R160W in the patient R0248 may have led to the onset of the disease at younger age, severe clinical symptoms as well as severe hypertrophy for receiving septum myectomy. It was not determined whether these double mutations were compound mutations or simply occurred in the same allele (cis). PCR and Sanger sequencing were performed on the available DNA samples from patient (R0164)’s mother and child. The fact that no mutations (p.I603V and p.R810H) were detected in the family members (Supplementary Fig. S3) suggests that the double mutations were derived, as single allele, from the deceased father. However, the possibility of a de novo mutation that may occur in either allele in germline cells of fertilized egg or somatic cells of embryonic tissues could not be excluded. Together, our results have shown that the patients with double mutations (n = 2) or PTC mutations (n = 12) are correlated with more severe manifestations requiring invasive therapies, compared with patients with missense mutations (n = 11) (p = 0.01). However, no correlation was found between other clinical indications and missense mutation group, PTC group and double mutations group.

Discussion

This study for the first time provided exome sequence analysis of MYBPC3 in Chinese patients by targeted capture and next-generation sequencing. Mutational screening yielded a genetic diagnosis of 25 patients (21.9%) in 114 unrelated HCM patients, suggesting MYBPC3 is the predominant HCM-causing gene in Chinese cases. The prevalence is similar to the Finnish patients13, but higher than that of 12.3% in Denmark14 or 15% in European15 HCM cases with MYBPC3 mutations. Although the spectrum of clinical phenotypes was broad, severe manifestations that required invasive therapies were more frequently found in our patients with disruptive mutations or double mutations, compared to the missense mutations. This finding is consistent with that in 110 consecutive, unrelated patients of European descent15. However, Nonsense mutations of MYBPC3 were also found to be associated with relatively benign clinical course in Japanese and French families161718, suggesting the existing of genetic modifiers for HCM. It is worth mentioning that among all mutations, the p.Y842X mutation was identified in 4 patients, indicating it is a frequent mutation in Chinese cases. Remarkably, all the patients with p.Y842X showed severe phenotype and ventricular arrhythmias, and mostly requiring invasive therapies. The p.Y842X was also observed in another Chinese pedigree, leading to severe hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction19. In Caucasian, however, only one HCM case was previously reported with p.Y842X14. Nevertheless, our data for the first time showed strong association between p.Y842X mutation and severe phenotype in this cohort, indicating this nonsense mutation may be used as a predictor for earlier clinical intervention. In summary, we have successfully applied the targeted capture and next-generation sequencing technique as a diagnostic tool and identified multiple novel mutations in MYBPC3, including the recurrent Y842X mutations, in Chinese patients with HCM. The detection of MYBPC3 mutation, especially the PTC mutation and double-mutation, may serve as a molecular marker for clinical risk stratification of HCM.

Methods

Patient selection

114 unrelated Han Chinese patients, diagnosed as HCM, were consecutively recruited at Anzhen hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing. Clinically, typical HCM was determined by maximal left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) ≥15 mm in echocardiography, while atypical HCM was considered by the wall thickness of 13 to 14 mm in the presence of other compelling information (e.g., family history of HCM)1. Other loading conditions such as hypertension or aortic valve stenosis were excluded during the screening. Experimental protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Anzhen hospital, and was carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. Informed consent for genetic analysis was obtained from each of the patients.

DNA library preparation

Genomic DNAs (gDNAs) were extracted from blood samples using QIAampBlood Midi Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). Each DNA sample was quantified by agarose gel electrophoresis and Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). DNA libraries were prepared according to Illumina’s protocol. Briefly, 3 μg of gDNAs were fragmented by nebulization; an “A” was then ligated to the 3′-end of the fragmented DNA. The sample was size-selected aiming for a 350 ~ 400 base pair for PCR amplification with a unique index. The final product was validated using the Agilent Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA).

Targeted genes enrichment and sequencing

The amplified DNAs were captured using MYBPC3 Gene Panel with biotinylated oligo-probes (MyGenostics GenCap Enrichment technologies, Beijing, China). The enrichment libraries were sequenced by Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA).

Bioinformatics analysis

High-quality reads were retrieved by filtering low quality reads and adaptor sequences using the Solexa QA package and the cut adapt program (http://code.google.com/p/cutadapt/), respectively. SOAP aligner program was used to align the clean read sequences to the human reference genome (hg19). After PCR duplicates were removed by the Picard software, SNPs was firstly identified using the SOAPsnp program (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/soapsnp.html). Subsequently, the selected reads were realigned to the reference genome using BWA. Insertions and deletions (InDels) were identified using the GATK program (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsa/wiki/index.php/Home_Page). Identified SNPs and InDels were annotated using the Exome-assistant program (http://122.228.158.106/exomeassistant) according to the reference sequence of MYBPC3 (NM_000256). MagicViewer was used to view short read alignment and validate candidate SNPs and InDels. SNPs and InDels presented in dbSNP137 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/), HapMap samples, 1000 Genome (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Ftp), and ESP6500 (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/) were removed. Nonsynonymous variants were evaluated by SIFT (http://sift.bii.a-star.edu.sg/) and Ployphen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) programs to predict their pathogenicity. Sanger sequencing with specific primers (Supplementary Table S1) was applied to confirm the identified mutations20.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Liu, X. et al. Screening Mutations of MYBPC3 in 114 Unrelated Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy by Targeted Capture and Next-generation Sequencing. Sci. Rep. 5, 11411; doi: 10.1038/srep11411 (2015).
  27 in total

1.  2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Bernard J Gersh; Barry J Maron; Robert O Bonow; Joseph A Dearani; Michael A Fifer; Mark S Link; Srihari S Naidu; Rick A Nishimura; Steve R Ommen; Harry Rakowski; Christine E Seidman; Jeffrey A Towbin; James E Udelson; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Contemporary insights and strategies for risk stratification and prevention of sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Barry J Maron
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  A paradigm shift in our understanding of the development of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy phenotype?: not so fast!

Authors:  Martin S Maron
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Two novel mutations of the MYBPC3 gene identified in Chinese families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Jia Lin; Dong-Dong Zheng; Qin Tao; Jun-Hua Yang; Wen-Ping Jiang; Xiang-Jun Yang; Jian-Ping Song; Ting-Bo Jiang; Xun Li
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 5.  Genetics and clinical destiny: improving care in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Carolyn Y Ho
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Semi-automated library preparation for high-throughput DNA sequencing platforms.

Authors:  Eveline Farias-Hesson; Jonathan Erikson; Alexander Atkins; Peidong Shen; Ronald W Davis; Curt Scharfe; Nader Pourmand
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-08

7.  Myofilament protein gene mutation screening and outcome of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Iacopo Olivotto; Francesca Girolami; Michael J Ackerman; Stefano Nistri; J Martijn Bos; Elisabetta Zachara; Steve R Ommen; Jeanne L Theis; Rachael A Vaubel; Federica Re; Corinna Armentano; Corrado Poggesi; Francesca Torricelli; Franco Cecchi
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after 20 years: clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Barry J Maron; Martin S Maron; Christopher Semsarian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes.

Authors:  Sarah B Ng; Emily H Turner; Peggy D Robertson; Steven D Flygare; Abigail W Bigham; Choli Lee; Tristan Shaffer; Michelle Wong; Arindam Bhattacharjee; Evan E Eichler; Michael Bamshad; Deborah A Nickerson; Jay Shendure
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Exome sequencing identifies the cause of a mendelian disorder.

Authors:  Sarah B Ng; Kati J Buckingham; Choli Lee; Abigail W Bigham; Holly K Tabor; Karin M Dent; Chad D Huff; Paul T Shannon; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Deborah A Nickerson; Jay Shendure; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  11 in total

1.  Transcriptome Profile Identifies Actin as an Essential Regulator of Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein C3 Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in a Zebrafish Model.

Authors:  Sahar Isa Da'as; Waseem Hasan; Rola Salem; Nadine Younes; Doua Abdelrahman; Iman A Mohamed; Arwa Aldaalis; Ramzi Temanni; Lisa Sara Mathew; Stephan Lorenz; Magdi Yacoub; Michail Nomikos; Gheyath K Nasrallah; Khalid A Fakhro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  Post-mortem genetic investigation in sudden cardiac death victims: complete exon sequencing of forty genes using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Jennifer Fadoni; Agostinho Santos; Laura Cainé
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.791

3.  MYBPC3 Haplotype Linked to Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Robert F Oldt; Kimberly J Bussey; Matthew L Settles; Joseph N Fass; Jeffrey A Roberts; J Rachel Reader; Srivathsan Komandoor; Victor A Abrich; Sreetharan Kanthaswamy
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 0.982

4.  Additional value of screening for minor genes and copy number variants in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Irene Mademont-Soler; Jesus Mates; Raquel Yotti; Maria Angeles Espinosa; Alexandra Pérez-Serra; Ana Isabel Fernandez-Avila; Monica Coll; Irene Méndez; Anna Iglesias; Bernat Del Olmo; Helena Riuró; Sofía Cuenca; Catarina Allegue; Oscar Campuzano; Ferran Picó; Carles Ferrer-Costa; Patricia Álvarez; Sergio Castillo; Pablo Garcia-Pavia; Esther Gonzalez-Lopez; Laura Padron-Barthe; Aranzazu Díaz de Bustamante; María Teresa Darnaude; José Ignacio González-Hevia; Josep Brugada; Francisco Fernandez-Aviles; Ramon Brugada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Identification of a novel hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-associated mutation using targeted next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Yue Zhao; Yue Feng; Xiaoxue Ding; Shuwei Dong; Hong Zhang; Jiahuan Ding; Xueshan Xia
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.101

6.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy clinical phenotype is independent of gene mutation and mutation dosage.

Authors:  Shiv Kumar Viswanathan; Heather K Sanders; James W McNamara; Aravindakshan Jagadeesan; Arshad Jahangir; A Jamil Tajik; Sakthivel Sadayappan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genetic determinants of clinical phenotype in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Lazar Velicki; Djordje G Jakovljevic; Andrej Preveden; Miodrag Golubovic; Marija Bjelobrk; Aleksandra Ilic; Snezana Stojsic; Fausto Barlocco; Maria Tafelmeier; Nduka Okwose; Milorad Tesic; Paul Brennan; Dejana Popovic; Arsen Ristic; Guy A MacGowan; Nenad Filipovic; Lars S Maier; Iacopo Olivotto
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Clinical characteristics and prognosis analysis of idiopathic and hereditary pulmonary hypertension patients with ACVRL1 gene mutations.

Authors:  Xinyu Zhang; Chen Zhang; Qiangqiang Li; Chunmei Piao; Hongsheng Zhang; Hong Gu
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.017

9.  Gender Related Differences in the Clinical Presentation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy-An Analysis from the SILICOFCM Database.

Authors:  Andrej Preveden; Miodrag Golubovic; Marija Bjelobrk; Tatjana Miljkovic; Aleksandra Ilic; Snezana Stojsic; Dragan Gajic; Mila Glavaski; Lars S Maier; Nduka Okwose; Dejana Popovic; Fausto Barlocco; Arsen Ristic; Guy A MacGowan; Iacopo Olivotto; Nenad Filipovic; Djordje G Jakovljevic; Lazar Velicki
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 10.  Drug Development and the Use of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Disease Modeling and Drug Toxicity Screening.

Authors:  Paz Ovics; Danielle Regev; Polina Baskin; Mor Davidor; Yuval Shemer; Shunit Neeman; Yael Ben-Haim; Ofer Binah
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.