Literature DB >> 26090760

Capsular Contracture in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Examining the Role of Acellular Dermal Matrix Fenestrations.

Donald S Mowlds1, Ara A Salibian, Thomas Scholz, Keyianoosh Z Paydar, Garrett A Wirth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrices have been proposed to decrease the incidence of capsular contracture in implant-based breast reconstructions. The authors have modified acellular dermal matrices with fenestrations to facilitate greater lower pole expansion and improve contour. The effect of fenestrations on the ability of matrices to suppress capsule formation, however, has not been examined.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all fenestrated acellular dermal matrix-assisted, implant-based breast reconstructions performed by the two senior authors, with a minimum of 1-year follow-up after permanent implant placement, was completed. Patient demographics, details of extirpative and reconstructive procedures, and complications were examined. Capsular contractures were scored according to the Baker grading scale and compared to those reported in the literature.
RESULTS: Thirty patients (50 breasts) underwent fenestrated acellular dermal matrix-assisted reconstruction, with mean follow-up times of 3.3 and 2.6 years after expander placement and implant exchange, respectively. Seven patients (23 percent) had a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m, three (10 percent) were active smokers, and six breasts (12 percent) were irradiated. Complications included one infection (2 percent), six cases (12 percent) of incisional superficial skin necrosis, and one (2 percent) tissue expander extrusion. Zero breasts had clinically significant Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture. The average Baker grade was 1.1.
CONCLUSIONS: Fenestrated acellular dermal matrices decrease capsular contracture to rates similar to what is seen with nonfenestrated matrices. Further research is necessary to determine whether this observation is a result of decreased need for inferolateral acellular dermal matrix coverage to achieve these effects or modified physical interaction of acellular dermal matrices with surrounding soft tissues. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26090760     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  11 in total

1.  Direct to implant breast reconstruction: visualized technique.

Authors:  Ilana G Margulies; Yasmina Zoghbi; Jordan Jacobs; Sarah P Cate; C Andrew Salzberg
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-10

2.  DermACELL Acellular Dermal Matrix in Oncologic Breast Reconstruction: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Austin R Swisher; Mark J Landau; Nikita Kadakia; Stephanie W Holzmer; Hahns Y Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Capsular Contracture of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Arm Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Jinfei Hou; Zhipeng Li; Bin Wang; Jiaming Sun
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Amifostine Prophylaxis in Irradiated Breast Reconstruction: A Study of Oncologic Safety In Vitro.

Authors:  Alexandra O Luby; Chitra Subramanian; Lauren K Buchman; Jeremy V Lynn; Kevin M Urlaub; Noah S Nelson; Alexis Donneys; Mark S Cohen; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  Incidence of Seromas and Infections Using Fenestrated versus Nonfenestrated Acellular Dermal Matrix in Breast Reconstructions.

Authors:  David A Palaia; Karen S Arthur; Anthony C Cahan; Michael H Rosenberg
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-12-09

6.  A Direct Comparison of Alloderm-Ready to Use (RTU) and DermACELL in Immediate Breast Implant Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael R Zenn; C Andrew Salzberg
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2016-08-11

Review 7.  One-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Concise Review.

Authors:  Nicolò Bertozzi; Marianna Pesce; Pierluigi Santi; Edoardo Raposio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Fenestrated Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Novel Design.

Authors:  Keyianoosh Z Paydar; Garrett A Wirth; Donald S Mowlds
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-04-04

Review 9.  Current Approaches Including Novel Nano/Microtechniques to Reduce Silicone Implant-Induced Contracture with Adverse Immune Responses.

Authors:  Shin Hyuk Kang; Chanutchamon Sutthiwanjampa; Chan Young Heo; Woo Seob Kim; Soo-Hong Lee; Hansoo Park
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Complications after Perforated versus Nonperforated Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  Kasey Leigh Wood; Ilana G Margulies; Paul L Shay; Andrew Y Ashikari; C Andrew Salzberg
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.