Eva Sahlin1, Gunnar Ahlborg2, Artur Tenenbaum3, Patrik Grahn4. 1. Department of Work Science, Business Economics and Environmental Psychology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 88, Alnarp S-230 53, Sweden. eva.sahlin@slu.se. 2. Institute of Stress Medicine, Sweden and Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Carl Skottbergs Gata 22B, Göteborg SE-413 19, Sweden. gunnar.ahlborg@vgregion.se. 3. Arbetslivet, Region Västra Götaland, Skaraborgs Sjukhus Skövde, Skövde SE- 541 85, Sweden. artur.tenenbaum@vgregion.se. 4. Department of Work Science, Business Economics and Environmental Psychology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 88, Alnarp S-230 53, Sweden. patrik.grahn@slu.se.
The authors wish to make the following corrections to their paper published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [1]:Page 1939, 4 lines from the bottom of the page, the sentence: “The number of participants scoring “moderate” or “severe” depression decreased from 52% (divided into: moderate 29% and severe 33%) at start of NBR to 26% (divided into: moderate 22% and severe 4%) at six-month follow-up, and had decreased further to 21% at twelve-month follow-up (divided into: moderate 17% and severe 4%) (Figure 5)” should read: “The number of participants scoring “moderate” or “severe” depression decreased from 62% (divided into: moderate 33% and severe 29%) at start of NBR to 26% (divided into: moderate 22% and severe 4%) at six-month follow-up, and had decreased further to 21% at twelve-month follow-up (divided into: moderate 17% and severe 4%) (Figure 5)”.The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to readers by these changes.