| Literature DB >> 26090441 |
Neena Verma1, Sanjiv Bimal1, Vidya Nand Rabi Das1, Krishna Pandey1, Dharmendra Singh1, Chandra Shekhar Lal1, Ashish Kumar Singh1, Prabhat Kumar Sinha1, Pradeep Das1.
Abstract
Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is an important factor in kala-azar transmission; hence its early detection and assessment of effective treatment is very important for disease control. In present study on 60 PKDL cases presented with macular, mixed papulonodular, or erythematous lesions, Leishmania parasites were demonstrated microscopically in 91% of papulonodular and 40% of macular lesions. Cellular infiltrates in skin biopsy imprint smears from lesions were mononuclear cells, 25-300/OIF (oil immersion field), predominantly histiocytes with vacuolation, many lymphocytes, some plasma cells, and Leishmania amastigotes 0-20/OIF. Cases with no demonstrable parasites were diagnosed on the basis of past history of VL, lesion's distribution, cytopathological changes, and positive DAT (86.83%). Following antileishmanial treatment with SAG, papulonodular forms of PKDL lesions disappeared clinically but microscopically the mononuclear cells (20-200/OIF) persisted in the dermal lesions. Response observed in macular PKDL lesions was poor which persisted both clinically and cytopathologically. Follow-up of PKDL will assess the effectivity of treatment as either disappearance of lesions or any relapse. Studies on involvement of immunological factors, that is, certain cytokines (IL-10, TGF-β, etc.) and chemokines (macrophage inflammatory protein, MIP 1-α, etc.) in PKDL, may provide insight for any role in the treatment response.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26090441 PMCID: PMC4450270 DOI: 10.1155/2015/745062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Showing age, sex, duration of past history of Kala-azar and leishmania positivity in various types of PKDL cases.
| Type of lesion | Hypopigmented macular | Papuloerythematous | Mixed macular Papulonodular lesion | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of PKDL Cases | 25 | 15 | 20 | 60 |
| With past history of Kala-azar | 21 | 14 | 19 | 54 |
| No past history of Kala-azar | 04 | 01 | 01 | 06 |
| Mean age range (years) | 14.15 (7–30) | 21.78 (10–36) | 26.86 (17–57) | 20.45 (7–57) |
| Sex (male/female) | 15/8 | 6/9 | 18/4 | 39/21 |
| Duration of past History of Kala-azar in mean (range) | 5 years | 8.95 years | 8.75 years | 7.5 years |
| Leishmania parasite positivity number (%) | 10 (40%) | 13 (86.67%) | 19 (95%) | 40 (66.67%) |
| DAT positivity (%) cases titre | 83.4% | 83.33% | 93.75% | 86.83% |
Clinicopathological changes in PKDL lesions in relation to treatment and immune response.
| Parameters | Before treatment | After treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical changes | Nodulo-papular | Absent or low papular lesion |
| Erythematous over whole face | Over chin only | |
| Macular over all body | Present but slightly fainter | |
|
| ||
| Microscopic findings | ||
|
| ||
| Leishmania parasite | Positive in 91% of papulonodular cases and 40% of macular cases. | Negative in all except one. |
|
| ||
| Cytological changes | Mononuclear cells (+++) | Number decreased (++) |
| 25–300/OIF, mostly clustered | 20–200/OIF, Scattered. | |
| Histiocytes predominant (15–250/OIF) | Many Histiocytes (10–140/OIF) | |
| Lymphocytes: 10–40/OIF | Lymphocytes: 10–60/OIF | |
| Plasma cells, epitheloid cells occasional | Plasma cells scarce | |
| Many activated macrophages with vacuolated appearance | Some activated macrophages with vacuolation present | |
|
| ||
| Immunological response | DAT—75% positive | DAT—66% positive |
| MIF +ve 70%, value 17–38% | MIF +ve all, value 33–65% | |