Literature DB >> 26090145

Crystal structure of NH4[La(SO4)2(H2O)].

Meriem Benslimane1, Yasmine Kheira Redjel1, Hocine Merazig1, Jean-Claude Daran2.   

Abstract

The principal building units in the crystal structure of ammonium aqua-bis(sulfato)-lanthanate(III) are slightly distorted SO4 tetra-hedra, LaO9 polyhedra in the form of distorted tricapped trigonal prisms, and NH4 (+) ions. The La(3+) cation is coordinated by eight O atoms from six different sulfate tetra-hedra, two of which are bidentate coordinating and four monodentate, as well as one O atom from a water mol-ecule; each sulfate anion bridges three La(3+) cations. These bridging modes result in the formation of a three-dimensional anionic [La(SO4)2(H2O)](-) framework that is stabilized by O-H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter-actions. The disordered ammonium cations are situated in the cavities of this framework and are hydrogen-bonded to six surrounding O atoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; hydrogen bonding; hydrous ternary sulfates; hydro­thermal synthesis

Year:  2015        PMID: 26090145      PMCID: PMC4459347          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015009457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Three-dimensional framework materials are characterized by their structural diversity. They are of continuing inter­est as a result of their technologically important properties and potential applications in catalysis, ion-exchange, adsorption, inter­calation, and radioactive waste remediation (Szostak, 1989 ▸; Cheetham et al., 1999 ▸; Rosi et al., 2003 ▸; Ok et al., 2007 ▸). Many materials showing such functional features contain structurally versatile cations, in particular heavier metal cations with large coordination spheres. Among many other cations, lanthanide cations have been used widely, since they exhibit high coordination numbers and can show a large topological diversity in the resulting framework structures (Bataille & Louër, 2002 ▸; Wickleder, 2002 ▸; Yuan et al., 2005 ▸). One of the most promising synthetic methods for the preparation of compounds with framework structures is the hydro­thermal (or solvothermal) reaction technique (Feng et al., 1997 ▸; Natarajan et al., 2000 ▸) in which mineralizers such as acids or bases are introduced to increase the solubility and reactivity of the reagents (Laudise, 1959 ▸; Laudise & Ballman, 1958 ▸). Moreover, organic or inorganic templates are used to direct the topologies of the framework structures and the concomitant physical and chemical properties of the products (Szostak, 1989 ▸; Breck, 1974 ▸; Barrer, 1982 ▸). Thus, we have tried to utilize the hydro­thermal technique to react a lanthanide cation (La3+) with sulfuric acid in the presence of NH4OH and 3-amino­benzoic acid as a template to prepare higher dimensional framework materials. However, in the present case the organic template was not incorporated in the resultant crystal structure of the title compound, NH4[La(SO4)2(H2O)], which represents a new hydrate form. Other members in the system NH4 +/La3+/SO4 2−/(H2O) are two forms of anhydrous (NH4)[La(SO4)2] (Sarukhanyan et al., 1984a ▸; Bénard-Rocherullé et al., 2001 ▸), (NH4)5[La(SO4)4] (Niinisto et al., 1980 ▸) and (NH4)[La(SO4)2(H2O)4] (Keppert et al., 1999 ▸). Sulfates with an A +:Ln 3+ (A + = alkaline ions, Ln 3+ = lanthanide ions) ratio of 1:1 are one of the best investigated groups among hydrous ternary sulfates. They crystallize either as monohydrates (Blackburn & Gerkin, 1995 ▸; Barnes, 1995 ▸; Iskhakova et al., 1985a ▸) or tetra­hydrates (Eriksson et al., 1974 ▸), and in few cases also as dihydrates (Kaucic et al., 1985 ▸; Iskhakova & Trunov, 1985 ▸). The tetra­hydrates are mainly found for the bigger monovalent ions Cs+, NH4 +, and Rb+. For the smaller A + ions such as Na+, the monohydrate becomes dominant.

Structural commentary

The structure of the title compound comprises LaO9 polyhedra and SO4 tetra­hedra as the principal building units (Fig. 1 ▸), forming an anionic [La(SO4)2(H2O)]− framework by sharing common edges and vertices (Fig. 2 ▸). The NH4 + counter-cations are situated in the cavities of this framework.
Figure 1

The principal building units, LaO9 polyhedra and SO4 tetra­hedra, in the crystal structure of (NH4)[La(SO4)2(H2O)], showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) 1 − x, − + y,  − z; (ii) 1 − x,  + y,  − z; (iii) 1 − x, 2 − y, −z; (iv) 2 − x, 2 − y, 1 − z; (v) x,  − y,  + z.]

Figure 2

The connection of LaO9 polyhedra and SO4 tetra­hedra in the crystal structure of (NH4)[La(SO4)2(H2O)], viewed along the a axis.

The La3+ cation is coordinated by eight O atoms from six different sulfate tetra­hedra. Two tetra­hedra are in a bidentate coordination mode and four tetra­hedra are in a monodentate mode. The distorted tricapped trigonal–prismatic coordination sphere is completed by one O atom from a water mol­ecule. The La—O bond lengths, ranging from 2.472 (3) to 2.637 (3) Å with 2.496 (3) Å to the water mol­ecule, and the O—La—O angles, ranging from 53.55 (8) to 145.43 (9)°, are similar to the analogous distances found in NaLa(SO4)2·H2O (Blackburn & Gerkin, 1995 ▸). The ninefold coordination of La3+ in NH4[La(SO4)2(H2O)] is typical for the majority of monohydrated alkali rare earth sulfate complexes and of rare earth complexes in general. For early members of the rare earth sulfate series, the coordination number of nine is realized, e.g. for Ce, Pr, La and Nd (Blackburn & Gerkin, 1994 ▸, 1995 ▸; Iskhakova et al., 1985b ▸, 1988 ▸). For later members of the sulfate series, such as Gd (Sarukhanyan et al., 1984b ▸), the coordination number decreases to eight, presumably in association with the lanthanide contraction. There are two sulfur atoms (S1, S2) in the asymmetric unit of the title compound, both with very similar S—O bond lengths in the ranges 1.465 (3)–1.488 (3) and 1.468 (3)–1.490 (3) Å, respectively. The range of O—S—O bond angles, 106.04 (16)–110.89 (19)° for S1 and 104.70 (16)–111.52 (17)° for S2, reflect the distortion of the two sulfate tetra­hedra. Each SO4 anion bridges three La3+ cations (Fig. 2 ▸).

Supra­molecular features

The bridging modes of the O atoms result in the formation of a three-dimensional anionic framework, stabilized by O—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions between the aqua ligand and the two SO4 tetra­hedra (Table 1 ▸) whereby each sulfate tetra­hedron establishes one hydrogen bond with the water mol­ecule via the oxygen atom (O6 and O3) corres­ponding to the longest S—O bonds. The N atoms are situated in the cavities of this framework. Although the H atoms of the ammonium cation could not be located, the N⋯O distances between 2.865 (5) and 3.036 (5) Å strongly suggest N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds of medium strength (Table 1 ▸). It appears most likely that the number of O atoms (six) in the vicinity of the N atom is the reason for the disorder of the ammonium cation.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
O1WH11O3i 0.84(5)1.94(5)2.717(5)153(5)
O1WH21O6ii 0.85(3)1.95(3)2.778(4)168(5)
N1O1iii   2.942(5) 
N1O6ii   3.036(5) 
N1O3iv   2.914(5) 
N1O8v   2.943(5) 
N1O5vi   2.865(5) 
N1O4  2.866(5) 

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) .

Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was obtained during the attempted preparation of a complex resulting from the hydro­thermal reaction of La2O3 (0.1 g, 1 mmol) with 37%wt sulfuric acid and 3-amino­benzoic acid (0.048 g, 1 mmol) in the presence of NH4OH in 10 ml water. The mixture was kept in a 23 ml Teflon-lined steel autoclave at 433 K for 3 d. After this treatment, the autoclave was cooled slowly to room temperature. Slow evaporation of the solvent at room temperature led to the formation of prismatic colourless crystals of the title compound.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. The oxygen-bound hydrogen atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and were refined with restraints of the O—H bond length [0.85 (1) Å] and H⋯H distances (1.39 Å) and with U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(O). The ammonium hydrogen atoms could not be located reliably by difference Fourier methods. Several disorder models considering the hydrogen-bonding environment (see Table 1 ▸) failed, eventually leading to the exclusion of the ammonium hydrogen atoms from the refinement. The maximum and minimum peaks in the final difference Fourier map are 0.93 and 0.72 Å, respectively, from atom La1.
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaNH4[La(SO4)2(H2O)]
M r 367.07
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c ()8.4919(16), 9.978(2), 11.9268(19)
()128.511(10)
V (3)790.7(3)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo K
(mm1)5.96
Crystal size (mm)0.30 0.20 0.10
 
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD
Absorption correctionFor a sphere (Dwiggins, 1975)
T min, T max 0.419, 0.431
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections2414, 2414, 2362
(sin /)max (1)0.715
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.027, 0.081, 1.26
No. of reflections2414
No. of parameters124
No. of restraints3
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
max, min (e 3)1.81, 1.48

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998 ▸), DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski Minor, 1997 ▸), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993 ▸), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), ORTEP-3 for Windows and WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ▸) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg Berndt, 1999 ▸).

Diffraction data were collected some time ago, and merged in the corresponding crystal class. Unfortunately, the original measurement data got lost; experiments to repeat the crystal growth were unsuccessful. Therefore the crystal structure was finally solved and refined with the merged data set. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015009457/wm5148sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015009457/wm5148Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1401662 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
NH4[La(SO4)2(H2O)]F(000) = 680
Mr = 367.07Dx = 3.083 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2542 reflections
a = 8.4919 (16) Åθ = 3–30.5°
b = 9.978 (2) ŵ = 5.96 mm1
c = 11.9268 (19) ÅT = 100 K
β = 128.511 (10)°Prism, colourless
V = 790.7 (3) Å30.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 (radius) mm
Z = 4
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer2414 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2362 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.0000
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.5°, θmin = 3.0°
CCD scansh = −12→0
Absorption correction: for a sphere (Dwiggins, 1975)k = −14→0
Tmin = 0.419, Tmax = 0.431l = −12→17
2414 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.081H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.26w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0427P)2 + 2.7376P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2414 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
124 parametersΔρmax = 1.81 e Å3
3 restraintsΔρmin = −1.48 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
La10.71683 (3)0.839390 (18)0.248314 (19)0.01052 (8)
S10.74128 (12)1.09162 (8)0.42791 (8)0.01163 (15)
S20.70608 (12)0.91270 (8)−0.02026 (8)0.01129 (15)
O10.6085 (4)1.0290 (3)−0.1156 (3)0.0179 (5)
O20.8105 (5)0.8337 (3)−0.0602 (3)0.0189 (5)
O30.8535 (4)0.9585 (3)0.1310 (3)0.0156 (5)
O80.9057 (4)1.1402 (3)0.5727 (3)0.0182 (5)
O40.5597 (4)0.8301 (3)−0.0221 (3)0.0188 (5)
O70.5667 (4)1.1797 (3)0.3641 (3)0.0229 (6)
O60.6873 (4)0.9516 (3)0.4347 (3)0.0185 (5)
O50.8062 (4)1.0870 (3)0.3387 (3)0.0192 (5)
O1W0.8711 (5)0.6537 (3)0.2059 (3)0.0241 (6)
H110.982 (5)0.615 (6)0.266 (4)0.036*
H210.820 (8)0.632 (6)0.121 (2)0.036*
N10.2567 (6)0.6458 (4)−0.2302 (4)0.0244 (7)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
La10.01098 (11)0.00981 (11)0.01113 (11)−0.00037 (5)0.00706 (9)−0.00028 (5)
S10.0106 (3)0.0110 (3)0.0114 (3)0.0009 (3)0.0059 (3)−0.0005 (3)
S20.0118 (3)0.0111 (3)0.0101 (3)0.0008 (3)0.0064 (3)0.0000 (2)
O10.0212 (12)0.0144 (11)0.0173 (11)0.0055 (10)0.0116 (10)0.0056 (9)
O20.0214 (13)0.0207 (14)0.0180 (13)0.0035 (10)0.0140 (12)−0.0013 (9)
O30.0158 (11)0.0162 (11)0.0111 (10)−0.0037 (9)0.0066 (9)−0.0028 (9)
O80.0141 (12)0.0206 (12)0.0141 (12)−0.0009 (10)0.0059 (10)−0.0041 (10)
O40.0181 (13)0.0212 (13)0.0174 (12)−0.0061 (9)0.0111 (11)−0.0018 (9)
O70.0139 (12)0.0207 (13)0.0217 (13)0.0068 (10)0.0049 (11)−0.0025 (10)
O60.0240 (13)0.0145 (11)0.0174 (12)−0.0029 (10)0.0130 (11)−0.0002 (9)
O50.0246 (13)0.0181 (12)0.0211 (12)−0.0020 (10)0.0174 (11)−0.0016 (10)
O1W0.0289 (16)0.0220 (14)0.0177 (13)0.0126 (11)0.0127 (12)0.0010 (10)
N10.0248 (16)0.0252 (18)0.0296 (18)−0.0037 (13)0.0201 (15)−0.0006 (13)
La1—O7i2.472 (3)S1—O81.471 (3)
La1—O1W2.496 (3)S1—O51.472 (3)
La1—O8ii2.521 (3)S1—O61.488 (3)
La1—O1iii2.533 (3)S2—O11.468 (3)
La1—O2iv2.563 (3)S2—O21.470 (3)
La1—O32.596 (3)S2—O41.480 (3)
La1—O52.612 (3)S2—O31.490 (3)
La1—O42.614 (3)O1W—H110.845 (10)
La1—O62.637 (3)O1W—H210.844 (10)
S1—O71.465 (3)
O7i—La1—O1W82.44 (12)O7i—La1—O699.16 (10)
O7i—La1—O8ii143.78 (10)O1W—La1—O6145.43 (9)
O1W—La1—O8ii71.36 (10)O8ii—La1—O689.43 (9)
O7i—La1—O1iii71.36 (10)O1iii—La1—O670.57 (9)
O1W—La1—O1iii139.83 (10)O2iv—La1—O671.00 (9)
O8ii—La1—O1iii143.55 (9)O3—La1—O6124.69 (8)
O7i—La1—O2iv72.90 (10)O5—La1—O653.55 (8)
O1W—La1—O2iv76.67 (10)O4—La1—O6144.28 (9)
O8ii—La1—O2iv76.96 (10)O7—S1—O8109.04 (17)
O1iii—La1—O2iv121.24 (9)O7—S1—O5110.89 (19)
O7i—La1—O3127.89 (10)O8—S1—O5110.49 (17)
O1W—La1—O376.32 (10)O7—S1—O6110.19 (18)
O8ii—La1—O370.11 (9)O8—S1—O6110.17 (16)
O1iii—La1—O396.07 (9)O5—S1—O6106.04 (16)
O2iv—La1—O3142.55 (9)O7—S1—La1119.80 (13)
O7i—La1—O5140.16 (10)O8—S1—La1131.15 (12)
O1W—La1—O5137.02 (11)O5—S1—La152.71 (11)
O8ii—La1—O571.62 (9)O6—S1—La153.78 (11)
O1iii—La1—O572.00 (9)O1—S2—O2109.67 (16)
O2iv—La1—O5114.84 (9)O1—S2—O4111.40 (17)
O3—La1—O571.17 (8)O2—S2—O4111.52 (17)
O7i—La1—O474.43 (10)O1—S2—O3109.85 (16)
O1W—La1—O469.69 (10)O2—S2—O3109.59 (17)
O8ii—La1—O4116.81 (9)O4—S2—O3104.70 (16)
O1iii—La1—O474.17 (9)La1—O1W—H11128 (4)
O2iv—La1—O4135.44 (9)La1—O1W—H21119 (4)
O3—La1—O453.65 (8)H11—O1W—H21112 (3)
O5—La1—O4109.69 (9)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1W—H11···O3v0.84 (5)1.94 (5)2.717 (5)153 (5)
O1W—H21···O6vi0.85 (3)1.95 (3)2.778 (4)168 (5)
N1···O1vii2.942 (5)
N1···O6vi3.036 (5)
N1···O3viii2.914 (5)
N1···O8i2.943 (5)
N1···O5iii2.865 (5)
N1···O42.866 (5)
  7 in total

1.  Inorganic lanthanide compounds with complex anions.

Authors:  Mathias S Wickleder
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Open-Framework Inorganic Materials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  [(CH3)2NH(CH2)2NH(CH3)2][(UO2)2F2(HPO4)2]: a new organically templated layered uranium phosphate fluoride--synthesis, structure, characterization, and ion-exchange reactions.

Authors:  Kang Min Ok; Michael B Doran; Dermot O'Hare
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 4.390

5.  Redetermination of sodium cerium(III) sulfate monohydrate, NaCe(SO4)2.H2O.

Authors:  A C Blackburn; R E Gerkin
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  Hydrogen storage in microporous metal-organic frameworks.

Authors:  Nathaniel L Rosi; Juergen Eckert; Mohamed Eddaoudi; David T Vodak; Jaheon Kim; Michael O'Keeffe; Omar M Yaghi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Three-dimensional open-framework cobalt(II) phosphates by novel routes.

Authors:  S Natarajan; S Neeraj; A Choudhury; C N Rao
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2000-04-03       Impact factor: 5.165

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.