| Literature DB >> 26090102 |
Patrice L Capers1, Hyacinth I Hyacinth2, Shayla Cue3, Prasanthi Chappa4, Tatyana Vikulina5, Susanne Roser-Page6, M Neale Weitzmann7, David R Archer4, Gale W Newman3, Alexander Quarshie3, Jonathan K Stiles3, Jacqueline M Hibbert3.
Abstract
Key pathophysiology of sickle cell anaemia includes compensatory erythropoiesis, vascular injury and chronic inflammation, which divert amino acids from tissue deposition for growth/weight gain and muscle formation. We hypothesised that sickle mice maintained on an isoenergetic diet with a high percentage of energy derived from protein (35 %), as opposed to a standard diet with 20 % of energy derived from protein, would improve body composition, bone mass and grip strength. Male Berkeley transgenic sickle mice (S; n 8-12) were fed either 20 % (S20) or 35 % (S35) diets for 3 months. Grip strength (BIOSEB meter) and body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan) were measured. After 3 months, control mice had the highest bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) (P < 0·005). S35 mice had the largest increase in grip strength. A two-way ANOVA of change in grip strength (P = 0·043) attributed this difference to genotype (P = 0·025) and a trend in type of diet (P = 0·067). l-Arginine (l-Arg) supplementation of the 20 % diet was explored, as a possible mechanism for improvement obtained with the 35 % diet. Townes transgenic sickle mice (TS; n 6-9) received 0·8, 1·6, 3·2 or 6·4 % l-Arg based on the same protocol and outcome measures used for the S mice. TS mice fed 1·6 % l-Arg for 3 months (TS1.6) had the highest weight gain, BMD, BMC and lean body mass compared with other groups. TS3.2 mice showed significantly more improvement in grip strength than TS0·8 and TS1.6 mice (P < 0·05). In conclusion, the high-protein diet improved body composition and grip strength. Outcomes observed with TS1.6 and TS3.2 mice, respectively, confirm the hypothesis and reveal l-Arg as part of the mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density; Body composition; C, C57BL/6 (control) mice; C20, control mice fed diet supplying 20 % energy from protein; C35, control mice fed diet supplying 35 % energy from protein; DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Grip strength; High-protein diet; LBM, lean body mass; S, Berkeley transgenic sickle mice; S20, Berkeley sickle mice fed diet supplying 20 % energy from protein; S35, Berkeley sickle mice fed diet supplying 35 % energy from protein; SCA, sickle cell anaemia; Sickle cell disease; TS, Townes sickle mice; TS0.8, Townes sickle mice fed 0·8 % l-Arg diet; TS1.6, Townes sickle mice fed 1·6 % l-Arg diet; TS3.2, Townes sickle mice fed 3·2 % l-Arg diet; TS6.4, Townes sickle mice fed 6·4 % l-Arg diet; l-Arg, l-arginine
Year: 2015 PMID: 26090102 PMCID: PMC4463939 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2014.63
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Sci ISSN: 2048-6790
Fig. 1.Effect of diet on body composition of sickle and control mice fed either 20 or 35 % of energy from protein for 3 months. Weight values represent the mean weekly weight per group (a). Bone mineral density (b) and bone mineral content (c) of control mice were significantly higher than for sickle mice regardless of diet. Lean body mass (d) was not different across the groups. Sickle mice had a significantly lower percentage of fat than control mice (e). Body composition was plotted individually and the mean value for all mice represented by the horizontal line. C20, control mice fed a diet supplying 20 % energy from protein (○); C35, control mice fed a diet supplying 35 % energy from protein (■); S20, Berkeley sickle mice fed a diet supplying 20 % energy from protein (△); S35, Berkeley sickle mice fed a diet supplying 35 % energy from protein (◆). * P < 0·05.
Body composition of mice fed either the standard or high-protein diet
(Mean values and standard deviations)
| C20* | C20 3 months | C35* | C35 3 months | S20* | S20 3 months | S35* | S35 3 months | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| Mean |
| |
| BMD (g/cm3) | 0·033 | 0·001 | 0·048 | 0·003 | 0·032 | 0·001 | 0·049 | 0·002 | 0·036 | 0·004 | 0·043 | 0·002 | 0·032 | 0·004 | 0·042 | 0·002 |
| BMC (g) | 0·216 | 0·014 | 0·407 | 0·035 | 0·197 | 0·023 | 0·425 | 0·043 | 0·243 | 0·067 | 0·367 | 0·032 | 0·186 | 0·039 | 0·369 | 0·014 |
| LBM (g) | 14·23 | 0·93 | 21·78 | 1·49 | 12·35 | 0·60 | 21·78 | 3·41 | 14·10 | 2·04 | 22·01 | 2·15 | 12·00 | 1·84 | 22·64 | 1·07 |
| Percentage fat | 16·14 | 1·04 | 24·42 | 4·57 | 16·13 | 1·59 | 25·13 | 3·68 | 19·96 | 2·86 | 16·98 | 1·73 | 18·60 | 2·00 | 16·84 | 2·95 |
C20, control mice fed a diet supplying 20 % energy from protein; C35, control mice fed a diet supplying 35 % energy from protein; S20, Berkeley sickle mice fed a diet supplying 20 % energy from protein; S35, Berkeley sickle mice fed diet supplying 35 % energy from protein; BMD, bone mineral density; BMC, bone mineral content; LBM, lean body mass; DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
* Values represent a separate set of mice fed the respective diet for 7 d after which the DXA scan was performed. Values at 3 months represent mean DXA measurements recorded after 3 months of feeding. Comparison of the two values will provide a sense of expected increases in body composition with feeding over 3 months.
Fig. 2.Grip strength after 3 months of feeding either 20 or 35 % of energy from protein or l-arginine (l-Arg) supplement. Grip strength improved after 3 months of feeding for all groups. The values are means illustrating baseline and final grip strength for each group. The S35 mice had the largest increase in grip strength over time in the standard v. high-protein diet (a). The TS3.2 mice had the largest increase in grip strength over time from l-Arg supplementation (b). ●, C20, control mice fed a diet supplying 20 % energy from protein; □, C35, control mice fed a diet supplying 35 % energy from protein; ▲, S20, Berkeley sickle mice fed a diet supplying 20 % energy from protein; ◊, S35, Berkeley sickle mice fed a diet supplying 35 % energy from protein; ○, TS0.8, Townes sickle mice fed 0·8 % l-Arg diet; ■, TS1.6, Townes sickle mice fed 1·6 % l-Arg diet; △, TS3.2, Townes sickle mice fed 3·2 % l-Arg diet; ◆, TS6.4, Townes sickle mice fed 6·4 % l-Arg diet.
Effect of mouse type (sickle or control), diet (protein level) and their interaction on change in grip strength*
| Partial SS | df | MS |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 7882·812 | 3 | 2627·604 | 2·995 | 0·043 |
| Genotype | 4773·366 | 1 | 4773·366 | 5·440 | 0·025 |
| Protein level | 3134·118 | 1 | 3134·118 | 3·572 | 0·067 |
| Genotype × protein level | 18·206 | 1 | 18·206 | 0·021 | 0·886 |
SS, sum of squares; MS, mean square.
Results of two-way ANOVA.
Fig. 3.Effect of l-arginine (l-Arg) supplementation on weight and haematological parameters. Weight adjusted for food intake increased each week (a). For the majority of the 12 weeks the TS1.6 mice had the highest values followed by TS0.8 mice. The TS3.2 group (three of which died) had the lowest weight gain values. TS6.4 mice had significantly higher Hb levels than all other groups (b). No differences were observed for leucocyte count across groups (c). TS3.2 and TS6.4 mice had significantly higher reticulocyte percentages than TS0.8 and TS1.6 mice (d). ○, TS0.8, Townes sickle mice fed 0·8% l-Arg diet; ■, TS1.6, Townes sickle mice fed 1·6 % l-Arg diet; △, TS3.2, Townes sickle mice fed 3·2 % l-Arg diet; ◆, TS6.4, Townes sickle mice fed 6·4 % l-Arg diet. * P < 0·05.
Fig. 4.Effect of l-arginine (l-Arg) diets on body composition. Weight increased over 3 months of feeding. TS1.6 mice had highest mean weight at 3 months and showed the greatest improvement in weight compared with 0 weeks (baseline). Body composition improved with prolonged feeding. TS1.6 mice had the highest bone mineral density (a), bone mineral content (b) and lean body mass (c), while TS6.4 mice had the lowest percentage fat (d). For body composition individual values are plotted and the mean value is represented by the horizontal line. TS0·8, Townes sickle mice fed 0·8 % l-Arg diet; TS1.6, Townes sickle mice fed 1·6 % l-Arg diet; TS3.2, Townes sickle mice fed 3·2 % l-Arg diet; TS6.4, Townes sickle mice fed 6·4 % l-Arg diet.