| Literature DB >> 26089953 |
Lorna Kwai-Ping Suen1, Chao Hsing Yeh2, Jojo Yee Mei Kwan3, Paul Hong Lee1, Grace Sau Ping Yeung4, Esther C Y Wong5, Billie C Lau5, Samuel Chi Hung Tsang6, Alice Siu Ping Cheung1, Vincent Tok Fai Yeung7.
Abstract
The reflexive property of the ear can cause various physical attributes to appear on the auricle in the presence of bodily disorders. The association of auricular signals (presence or absence of discoloration, marks after pressing, tenderness, and electrical resistance) and diabetes mellitus (DM) should be further investigated because auricular diagnosis is an objective, painless, and noninvasive method that provides rapid access to information. A matched case-control study on 282 subjects was conducted. Cases (n = 141) were defined as those diagnosed with type 2 DM (T2DM). Every subject in the case group was matched with the control by age and gender. Ear diagnosis was conducted in three aspects: inspection, electrical detection, and tenderness testing. Results suggest that the tenderness and electrical conductivity of some auricular points, including "pancreas and gallbladder," "endocrine," "kidney," "lower tragus," "heart," and "eyes," were associated with T2DM status in Chinese population. In the subgroup analyses, certain auricular signals were also associated with glycemic control, disease duration, and related complications. Auricular diagnosis could be considered as a screening method for vulnerable populations with T2DM risk. Thus, appropriate interventions can be implemented to prevent or delay the progression of T2DM.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26089953 PMCID: PMC4452325 DOI: 10.1155/2015/981563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Sociodemographic data and DM-related conditions of participants.
| DM +ve | DM −ve | Test statistics | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 64.21 (12.05) | 63.62 (13.35) |
|
| Gender | N/A | ||
| Male | 70 (49.6%) | 70 (49.6%) | |
| Female | 71 (50.4%) | 71 (50.4%) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.31 (4.29) | 23.06 (3.14) |
|
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.96 (0.11) | 0.86 (0.07) |
|
| Comorbid illness |
| ||
| Yes | 135 (95.7%) | 112 (79.4%) | |
| No | 6 (4.3%) | 29 (20.6%) | |
| Smoking status |
| ||
| Never | 97 (68.8%) | 114 (80.9%) | |
| Given up | 32 (22.7%) | 20 (14.2%) | |
| Occasionally | 4 (2.8%) | 1 (0.7%) | |
| Regularly | 8 (5.7%) | 6 (4.3%) | |
| Alcohol consumption |
| ||
| Never | 84 (59.6%) | 102 (72.3%) | |
| Given up | 16 (11.3%) | 11 (7.8%) | |
| Occasionally | 38 (27.0%) | 26 (18.4%) | |
| Regularly | 3 (2.1%) | 2 (1.4%) | |
| Mean arterial pressure (MABP): | 97.78 (12.74) | 94.67 (11.86) |
|
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 137.07 (22.60) | 135.19 (19.89) |
|
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 78.13 (10.61) | 74.42 (10.90) |
|
| Family history of DM | |||
| Yes | 67 (47.5%) | ||
| No | 74 (52.5%) | ||
| Duration of illness (years) | 13.31 (8.38) | ||
| Presence of CV problem, including coronary heart disease and stroke | |||
| Yes | 32 (22.7%) | 9 (6.40%) | |
| No | 109 (77.3%) | 132 (93.6%) | |
| Presence of diabetic retinopathy | |||
| Yes | 45 (36.6%) | ||
| No | 78 (63.4%) | ||
| (i) Mild nonproliferative | 38 (82.6%) | ||
| (ii) Moderate nonproliferative | 3 (6.5%) | ||
| (iii) Severe nonproliferative | 1 (0.7%) | ||
| (iv) Very severe nonproliferative | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| (v) Clinically significant macular edema | 1 (0.7%) | ||
| Presence of nephropathy | |||
| Yes | 32 (22.7%) | ||
| No | 109 (77.3%) |
∗Statistically significant.
Auricular signals between cases and controls.
| DM +ve | DM −ve | Test statistics | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discoloration around “P&G” region (Rt) | |||
| Yes | 1 (0.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | N/A |
| No | 140 (99.3%) | 141 (100.0%) | |
| Discoloration around “P&G” region (Lt) | |||
| Yes | 1 (0.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | N/A |
| No | 140 (99.3%) | 141 (100.0%) | |
| Marks appearing around “P&G” region after pressing (Rt) | |||
| Yes | 6 (4.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | N/A |
| No | 135 (95.7%) | 141 (100.0%) | |
| Marks appearing around “P&G” region after pressing (Lt) | |||
| Yes | 2 (1.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | N/A |
| No | 139 (98.6%) | 141 (100.0%) | |
| Tenderness (P&G) (Rt) |
| ||
| Positive | 103 (73.0%) | 42 (29.8%) | |
| Negative | 38 (27.0%) | 99 (70.2%) | |
| Tenderness (P&G) (Lt) |
| ||
| Positive | 78 (55.3%) | 45 (31.9%) | |
| Negative | 63 (44.7%) | 96 (68.1%) | |
| Conductivity (P&G) (Rt) |
| ||
| Positive | 93 (66.0%) | 37 (26.2%) | |
| Negative | 48 (34.0%) | 104 (73.8%) | |
| Conductivity (P&G) (Lt) |
| ||
| Positive | 86 (61.0%) | 35 (24.8%) | |
| Negative | 55 (39.0%) | 106 (75.2%) | |
| Conductivity (endocrine) (Rt) |
| ||
| Positive | 88 (62.4%) | 50 (35.5%) | |
| Negative | 53 (37.6%) | 91 (64.5%) | |
| Conductivity (endocrine) (Lt) |
| ||
| Positive | 73 (51.8%) | 37 (26.2%) | |
| Negative | 68 (48.2%) | 104 (73.8%) | |
| Conductivity (kidney) (Rt) |
| ||
| Positive | 83 (58.9%) | 41 (29.1%) | |
| Negative | 58 (41.1%) | 100 (70.9%) | |
| Conductivity (kidney) (Lt) |
| ||
| Positive | 67 (47.5%) | 41 (29.1%) | |
| Negative | 74 (52.5%) | 100 (70.9%) | |
| Conductivity (lower tragus) (Rt) |
| ||
| Positive | 61 (43.3%) | 41 (29.1%) | |
| Negative | 80 (56.7%) | 100 (70.9%) | |
| Conductivity (lower tragus) (Lt) |
| ||
| Positive | 54 (38.3%) | 37 (26.2%) | |
| Negative | 87 (61.7%) | 104 (73.8%) | |
| Conductivity (heart) (Rt) |
| ||
| Positive | 80 (56.7%) | 44 (31.2%) | |
| Negative | 61 (43.3%) | 97 (68.8%) | |
| Conductivity (heart) (Lt) |
| ||
| Positive | 74 (52.5%) | 36 (25.5%) | |
| Negative | 67 (47.5%) | 105 (74.5%) | |
| Conductivity (eyes) (Rt) |
| ||
| Positive | 78 (55.3%) | 54 (38.3%) | |
| Negative | 63 (44.7%) | 87 (61.7%) | |
| Conductivity (eyes) (Lt) |
| ||
| Positive | 64 (45.4%) | 43 (30.5%) | |
| Negative | 77 (54.6%) | 98 (69.5%) |
∗Statistically significant.
Predictive power of various ear acupoints on the risk of DM.
| Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Positive predictive value (%) | Negative predictive value (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marks appearing around “P&G” region after pressing, (Rt) | 0.7 | 100 | 100 | 50.2 |
| Marks appearing around “P&G” region after pressing, (Lt) | 0.7 | 100 | 100 | 50.2 |
| Tenderness, (Rt) (P&G) | 73.0 | 70.2 | 71.0 | 72.3 |
| Tenderness, (Lt) (P&G) | 55.3 | 68.1 | 63.4 | 60.4 |
| Electrical conductivity, (Rt) | ||||
| P&G | 66.0 | 73.8 | 71.5 | 68.4 |
| Endocrine | 62.4 | 64.5 | 63.8 | 63.2 |
| Kidney | 58.9 | 70.9 | 66.9 | 63.3 |
| Lower tragus | 43.3 | 70.9 | 59.8 | 55.6 |
| Heart | 56.7 | 68.8 | 64.5 | 61.4 |
| Liver | 27.7 | 80.9 | 59.1 | 52.8 |
| Eyes | 55.3 | 61.7 | 59.1 | 58.0 |
| Electrical conductivity, (Lt) | ||||
| P&G | 61.0 | 75.2 | 71.1 | 65.8 |
| Endocrine | 51.8 | 73.8 | 66.4 | 60.5 |
| Kidney | 47.5 | 70.9 | 62.0 | 57.5 |
| Lower tragus | 38.3 | 73.8 | 59.3 | 54.5 |
| Heart | 52.5 | 74.5 | 67.3 | 61.0 |
| Liver | 25.5 | 83.7 | 61.0 | 52.9 |
| Eyes | 45.4 | 69.5 | 59.8 | 56.0 |
Sensitivity (true positive) = number of true positives/number of true positives + number of false negatives.
Specificity (true negative) = number of true negatives/number of true negatives + number of false positives.
Positive predictive value = number of true positives/number of true positives + number of false positives.
Negative predictive value = number of true negatives/number of true negatives + number of false negatives.
Odds ratio of various ear acupoints on the risk of DM.
| Odds ratioa | 95% CI | Odds ratiob | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenderness, (Rt) (P&G) | 7.10∗∗∗ | (3.66, 13.77) | 6.74∗∗∗ | (2.38, 19.08) |
| Tenderness, (Lt) (P&G) | 2.57∗∗∗ | (1.55, 4.26) | 1.62 | (0.75, 3.47) |
| Electrical conductivity, (Rt) | ||||
| P&G | 6.09∗∗∗ | (3.22, 11.52) | 9.65∗∗∗ | (3.14, 29.60) |
| Endocrine | 3.71∗∗∗ | (2.06, 6.70) | 3.70∗ | (1.32, 10.25) |
| Kidney | 3.47∗∗∗ | (2.02, 5.95) | 3.06∗∗ | (1.31, 7.15) |
| Lower tragus | 1.91∗ | (1.14, 3.20) | 1.72 | (0.74, 4.00) |
| Heart | 3.77∗∗∗ | (2.05, 6.95) | 3.69∗ | (1.26, 10.77) |
| Liver | 1.67 | (0.93, 2.99) | 1.57 | (0.59, 4.13) |
| Eyes | 2.09∗∗ | (1.26, 3.48) | 1.94 | (0.81, 4.66) |
| Electrical conductivity, (Lt) | ||||
| P&G | 6.67∗∗∗ | (3.31, 13.43) | 2.82∗ | (1.12, 7.09) |
| Endocrine | 4.00∗∗∗ | (1.14, 3.10) | 2.74∗ | (1.01, 7.41) |
| Kidney | 2.24∗∗ | (1.34, 3.74) | 1.42 | (0.63, 3.19) |
| Lower tragus | 1.85∗ | (1.07, 3.19) | 1.48 | (0.62, 3.54) |
| Heart | 3.92∗∗∗ | (2.13, 7.21) | 3.34∗ | (1.23, 9.08) |
| Liver | 1.81 | (0.98, 3.34) | 2.25 | (0.74, 6.81) |
| Eyes | 2.11∗∗ | (1.21, 3.64) | 1.95 | (0.73, 5.20) |
aAdjusted for age and sex.
bFurther adjusted for smoking habit, alcohol consumption, MABP, BMI, and waist-to-hip ratio.
∗Statistically significant at 5% level.
∗∗Statistically significant at 1% level.
∗∗∗Statistically significant at 0.1% level.
Figure 1