Literature DB >> 26089254

Prevalence of the "double-line" sign when performing focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) examinations.

Amy Shah Patwa1, Steven Cipot, Alvin Lomibao, Mathew Nelson, Robert Bramante, Veena Modayil, Christine Haines, Adam Ash, Christopher Raio.   

Abstract

The double-line sign (DLS) is a wedge-shaped hypoechoic area in Morison's pouch bounded on both sides by echogenic lines. It represents a false-positive finding for free intraperitoneal fluid when performing focused assessment with sonography in trauma examinations. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of DLS. Secondarily, the study will further investigate the relationship between the presence of a DLS and body mass index (BMI). This was a prospective study that enrolled patients over a 7-month period. Inclusion criteria were patients ≥ 18 years of age presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) requiring a FAST examination as part of the patient's standard medical care. Each examination was performed by one of six experienced ultrasonographers. Presence or absence of the DLS was established in real time and gender, height, weight, and BMI were recorded for each patient. The overall prevalence rate of DLS and the corresponding 95 % confidence interval were calculated, as well as the prevalence rates broken down by BMI characterized as underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese; and age category (18-29, 30-64, and 65+). The Chi-square test and a Fisher's exact test for BMI category were used to compare the prevalence rates of positive DLS among the different demographic groups. 100 patients were enrolled in the study; the overall prevalence was 27 %. There was no statistical significance among the different demographic groups or BMI. The DLS is a prevalent finding. We believe this sign has become more apparent due to improved imaging technology and resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26089254     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-015-1264-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  5 in total

1.  Fluid-filled bowel mimicking hemoperitoneum: a false-positive finding during sonographic evaluation for trauma.

Authors:  John L Kendall; Joseph P Ramos
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.484

2.  The "gastric fluid" sign: an unrecognized false-positive finding during focused assessment for trauma examinations.

Authors:  Arun Nagdev; Justin Racht
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Residents should not independently perform focused abdominal sonography for trauma after 10 training examinations.

Authors:  Timothy Jang; Sanford Sineff; Rosanne Naunheim; Chandra Aubin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Is the FAST exam reliable in severely injured patients?

Authors:  Alexander Becker; Guy Lin; Mark G McKenney; Antonio Marttos; Carl I Schulman
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  The double-line sign: a false positive finding on the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examination.

Authors:  Paul R Sierzenski; Joel M Schofer; Michael J Bauman; Jason T Nomura
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 1.484

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition.

Authors:  Donat R Spahn; Bertil Bouillon; Vladimir Cerny; Jacques Duranteau; Daniela Filipescu; Beverley J Hunt; Radko Komadina; Marc Maegele; Giuseppe Nardi; Louis Riddez; Charles-Marc Samama; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rolf Rossaint
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 2.  Focused assessment with sonography for trauma: current perspectives.

Authors:  Sorravit Savatmongkorngul; Sirote Wongwaisayawan; Rathachai Kaewlai
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.