A Williams Andrews1, Dongmei Li2, Janet K Freburger3. 1. A.W. Andrews, PT, EdD, NCS, Department of Physical Therapy Education, Elon University, Campus Box 2085, Elon, NC 27244 (USA). andrewsb@elon.edu. 2. D. Li, MS, The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. J.K. Freburger, PT, PhD, The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the use of rehabilitation in the acute care setting and its impact on hospital readmissions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the association between the intensity of rehabilitation services received during the acute care stay for stroke and the risk of 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort analysis of all acute care hospitals in Arkansas and Florida was conducted. METHODS: Patients (N=64,065) who were admitted for an incident stroke in 2009 or 2010 were included. Rehabilitation intensity was categorized as none, low, medium-low, medium-high, or high based on the sum and distribution of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy charges within each hospital. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios, controlling for demographic characteristics, illness severity, comorbidities, hospital variables, and state. RESULTS: Relative to participants who received the lowest intensity therapy, those who received higher-intensity therapy had a decreased risk of 30-day readmission. The risk was lowest for the highest-intensity group (hazard ratio=0.86; 95% confidence interval=0.79, 0.93). Individuals who received no therapy were at an increased risk of hospital readmission relative to those who received low-intensity therapy (hazard ratio=1.30; 95% confidence interval=1.22, 1.40). The findings were similar, but with smaller effects, for 90-day readmission. Furthermore, patients who received higher-intensity therapy had more comorbidities and greater illness severity relative to those who received lower-intensity therapy. LIMITATIONS: The results of the study are limited in scope and generalizability. Also, the study may not have adequately accounted for all potentially important covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of and intensity of rehabilitation therapy in the acute care of stroke is associated with a decreased risk of hospital readmission.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the use of rehabilitation in the acute care setting and its impact on hospital readmissions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the association between the intensity of rehabilitation services received during the acute care stay for stroke and the risk of 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort analysis of all acute care hospitals in Arkansas and Florida was conducted. METHODS:Patients (N=64,065) who were admitted for an incident stroke in 2009 or 2010 were included. Rehabilitation intensity was categorized as none, low, medium-low, medium-high, or high based on the sum and distribution of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy charges within each hospital. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios, controlling for demographic characteristics, illness severity, comorbidities, hospital variables, and state. RESULTS: Relative to participants who received the lowest intensity therapy, those who received higher-intensity therapy had a decreased risk of 30-day readmission. The risk was lowest for the highest-intensity group (hazard ratio=0.86; 95% confidence interval=0.79, 0.93). Individuals who received no therapy were at an increased risk of hospital readmission relative to those who received low-intensity therapy (hazard ratio=1.30; 95% confidence interval=1.22, 1.40). The findings were similar, but with smaller effects, for 90-day readmission. Furthermore, patients who received higher-intensity therapy had more comorbidities and greater illness severity relative to those who received lower-intensity therapy. LIMITATIONS: The results of the study are limited in scope and generalizability. Also, the study may not have adequately accounted for all potentially important covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of and intensity of rehabilitation therapy in the acute care of stroke is associated with a decreased risk of hospital readmission.
Authors: Klayne Cunha Matos; Vanessa Fernandes de Oliveira; Paula Luanna Carvalho de Oliveira; Fabíola Aureliano Carvalho; Maria Renata Matos de Mesquita; Camila Gabriella da Silva Queiroz; Levi Mota Marques; Débora Lilian Nascimento Lima; Fernanda Martins Maia Carvalho; Pedro Braga-Neto Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 2.903
Authors: Corina Schuster-Amft; Jan Kool; J Carsten Möller; Raoul Schweinfurther; Markus J Ernst; Leah Reicherzer; Carina Ziller; Martin E Schwab; Simon Wieser; Markus Wirz Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2022-07-05
Authors: Joshua K Johnson; Michael B Rothberg; Kellie Adams; Brittany Lapin; Tamra Keeney; Mary Stilphen; Francois Bethoux; Janet K Freburger Journal: Med Care Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Amit Kumar; Linda Resnik; Amol Karmarkar; Janet Freburger; Deepak Adhikari; Vincent Mor; Pedro Gozalo Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Addie Middleton; Yong-Fang Kuo; James E Graham; Amol Karmarkar; Yu-Li Lin; James S Goodwin; Allen Haas; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Ickpyo Hong; Sara Knox; Loree Pryor; Tracy M Mroz; James E Graham; Meredith F Shields; Timothy A Reistetter Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 3.412