Literature DB >> 26089012

Progression of Low-Gradient, Low-Flow, Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Christophe Tribouilloy1, Dan Rusinaru2, Vincent Charles3, Jamila Boulif4, Frédéric Maes4, Franck Lévy3, Agnès Pasquet4, Sylvestre Maréchaux5, Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde4.   

Abstract

Low-gradient (LG), low-flow (LF), severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved ejection fraction (PEF) is considered by some authors as an advanced form of AS associated with very poor outcome. The aim of this Doppler echocardiographic study was to investigate changes over time in the hemodynamic severity of LG/LF AS with PEF. We retrospectively identified in 2 academic centers 59 patients who had 2 Doppler echocardiographic examinations without an intervening event. After a median follow-up of 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.3 to 3.5) years, progression was observed with increase in mean Doppler gradient (MDG; from 27 [23 to 32] to 37 [28 to 44] mm Hg; p <0.001), peak aortic jet velocity (from 330 [314 to 366] to 373 [344 to 423] cm/s; p <0.001), and decrease in aortic valve area (AVA; from 0.73 [0.63 to 0.92] to 0.64 [0.56 to 0.75] cm(2); p = 0.001). Annual rates were, respectively, 8 mm Hg/year, 36 cm/s/year, and -0.04 cm(2)/year. EF decreased from 62% (55% to 69%) to 58% (51% to 65%), p = 0.001. At follow-up, MDG increase was observed in 51 patients (86%), and 24 patients (41%) acquired the features of classical high-gradient (HG) severe AS (MDG ≥40 mm Hg and peak aortic jet velocity ≥400 cm/s). There were no differences as regard to baseline hemodynamic parameters between patients who displayed ≥5 mm Hg MDG increase and those in whom such increase was not observed. In conclusion, most patients with LG/LF AS with PEF exhibit over time increase in MDG and decrease in AVA with slight EF impairment. This result suggests that LG/LF AS with PEF is an intermediate stage between moderate AS and HG AS rather than an advanced form of the disease.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26089012     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

Review 1.  Workup and Management of Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Marine Clisson; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-05-02

Review 2.  [Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis].

Authors:  H Ten Freyhaus; S Baldus
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Impact of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity on the grading of aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction.

Authors:  Frédéric Maes; Sophie Pierard; Christophe de Meester; Jamila Boulif; Mihaela Amzulescu; David Vancraeynest; Anne-Catherine Pouleur; Agnès Pasquet; Bernhard Gerber; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Jamila Boulif; Alisson Slimani; Siham Lazam; Christophe de Meester; Sophie Piérard; Agnès Pasquet; Anne-Catherine Pouleur; David Vancraeynest; Gébrine El Khoury; Laurent de Kerchove; Bernhard L Gerber; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.